Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Guidance on Public Reporting of Healthcare-Associated Infections: Recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee

  • Linda McKibben (a1), Teresa C. Horan (a2), Jerome I. Tokars (a2), Gabrielle Fowler (a2), Denise M. Cardo (a1), Michele L. Pearson (a3), Patrick J. Brennan (a4) and Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee*...

Extract

Consumer demand for healthcare information, including data about the performance of healthcare providers, has increased steadily during the past decade. Many state and national initiatives are under way to mandate or induce healthcare organizations to publicly disclose information regarding institutional and physician performance. Mandatory public reporting of healthcare performance is intended to enable stakeholders, including consumers, to make more informed choices on healthcare issues.

Public reporting of healthcare performance information has taken several forms. Healthcare performance reports (report cards and honor rolls) typically describe the outcomes of medical care in terms of mortality, selected complications, or medical errors and, to a lesser extent, economic outcomes. Increasingly, process measures (ie, measurement of adherence to recommended healthcare practices, such as hand hygiene) are being used as an indicator of how well an organization adheres to established standards of practice with the implicit assumption that good processes lead to good healthcare outcomes. National healthcare quality improvement initiatives, notably those of the Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO), the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), and the Hospital Quality Alliance, use process measures in their public reporting initiatives.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Mailstop E-68, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, NE, Atlanta, GA 30333.mpearson@cdc.gov

References

Hide All
1.Weinstein, RA. Nosocomial infection update. Emerg Infect Dis 1998;4: 416420.
2.Garner, JS. The CDC Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect Control 1993;21:160162.
3.Kizer, KW. Establishing health care performance standards in an era of consumerism. JAMA 2001;286:12131217.
4.The National Quality Forum. National Voluntary Consensus Standards for Hospital Care: An Initial Performance Measure Set. Washington, DC: The National Quality Forum; 2003.
5.The National Quality Forum. Safe Practices for Better Healthcare: A Consensus Report. Washington, DC: The National Quality Forum; 2003.
6.The National Quality Forum. Policy on Endorsement of Proprietary Performance Measures. Washington, DC: The National Quality Forum; 2004. Available at QualityForum.org.
7.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Updated guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems. MMWR 2001;50:135.
8.Mangram, AJ, Horan, TC, Pearson, ML, Silver, LC, Jarvis, WR, the Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999;20:247278.
9.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. MMWR 2002;51:129. Erratum to p. 29, Appendix B, published in MMWR 2002;51:711.
10.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Nosocomial infection rates for interhospital comparison: limitations and possible solutions. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1991;12:609621.
11.Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology. Release of nosocomial infection data. APIC News 1998;17:15.
12.Piatt, R, Yokoe, DS, Sands, KE. Automated methods for surveillance of surgical site infections. Emerg Infect Dis 2001;7:212216.
13.Yokoe, D, Noskin, G, Cunningham, S, et al.Enhanced identification of postoperative infections among inpatients. Emerg Infect Dis 2004;10:19241930.
14.Weigelt, JA, Dryer, D, Haley, RW. The necessity and efficiency of wound surveillance after discharge. Arch Surg 1992;127:777782.
15.Emori, TG, Edwards, JR, Culver, DH, et al.Accuracy of reporting nosocomial infections in intensive-care-unit patients to the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System: a pilot study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1998;19:308316. Erratum published in Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1998;19:479.
16.Jarvis, WR, Edwards, JR, Culver, DH, et al.Nosocomial infection rates in adult and pediatric intensive care units in the United States. Am J Med 1991;91(suppl 3B):185S191S.
17.Gaynes, RP, Martone, WJ, Culver, DH, et al.Comparison rates of nosocomial infections in neonatal intensive care units in the United States. Am J Med 1991;91(suppl):192S196S.
18.Horan, TC, Gaynes, R. Surveillance of nosocomial infections. In: Mayhall, CG, ed. Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Control. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004:16591702.
19.Gaynes, RP, Culver, DH, Horan, TC, Edwards, JR, Richards, C, Toison, JS. Surgical site infection (SSI) rates in the United States, 1992-1998: the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System basic SSI risk index. Clin Infect Dis 2001;33:S69S77.
20.Culver, DH, Horan, TC, Gaynes, RP, Martone, WJ, Jarvis, WR, Emori, TG. Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedures, and patient risk index. Am J Med 1991;91(suppl):152S157S.
21.Haley, RW, Culver, DH, White, JW, et al.The efficacy of infection surveillance and control programs in preventing nosocomial infections in US hospitals. Am J Epidemiol 1985;121:182205.
22.Trick, W, Zagorski, B, Tokars, J, et al.Computer algorithms to detect bloodstream infections. Emerg Infect Dis 2004;10:16121620.
23.Samore, MH, Evans, RS, Lassen, A, et al.Surveillance of medical device-related hazards and adverse events in hospitalized patients. JAMA 2004;291:325334.
24.Yokoe, DS, Anderson, J, Chambers, R, et al.Simplified surveillance for nosocomial bloodstream infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1998;19:657660.
25.Klevens, M, Tokars, J, Edwards, J. Simplified methods for collection of device denominators. Presented at the 14th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America; April 1820, 2004; Alexandria, VA. Abstract.
26.McCall, JL, Macchiaroli, S, Brown, RB, et al.A method to track surgical site infections. Quality Management in Health Care 1998;6:5262.
27.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Monitoring hospital-acquired infections to promote patient safety: United States, 1990-1999. MMWR 2000;49:149153. Erratum published in MMWR 2000;49:189.
28.Raad, II, Hohn, DC, Gilbreath, BJ, et al.Prevention of central venous catheter-related infections by using maximal sterile barrier precautions during insertion. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1994;15:231238.
29.Chaiyakunapruk, N, Veenstra, DL, Lipsky, BA, Saint, S. Chlorhexidine compared with povidone-iodine solution for vascular catheter-site care: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2002;136:792801.
30.Bratzier, DW, Houck, PM, Surgical Infection Prevention Guidelines Writers Workgroup, et al.Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: an advisory statement from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project. Clin Infect Dis 2004;38:17061715.
31.Tablan, OC, Anderson, LJ, Besser, R, Bridges, C, Hajjeh, R. Guidelines for preventing healthcare-associated pneumonia, 2003. MMWR 2004; 53:136.
32.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevention and control of influenza. MMWR 2004;53:140.
33.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Immunization of healthcare workers: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) and the Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC). MMWR 1997;46:142.
34.Last, JM. A Dictionary of Epidemiology, ed. 2. New York: Oxford University Press; 1988.
35. Anonymous. New classification of physical status. Anesthesiology 1963; 24:111.
36.Garner, JS. CDC guidelines for prevention of surgical wound infections, 1985. Infect Control 1986;7:193200.
37.Simmons, BP. Guideline for prevention of surgical wound infections. Infect Control 1982;3:185196.
38.Horan, TC, Culver, DH. Comparing surgical site infection rates. In: Pfeiffer, JA, ed. APIC Text of Infection Control and Epidemiology. Washington, DC: Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology; 2000:17.

Guidance on Public Reporting of Healthcare-Associated Infections: Recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee

  • Linda McKibben (a1), Teresa C. Horan (a2), Jerome I. Tokars (a2), Gabrielle Fowler (a2), Denise M. Cardo (a1), Michele L. Pearson (a3), Patrick J. Brennan (a4) and Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee*...

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed