Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Evaluation of Two Retrospective Active Surveillance Methods for the Detection of Nosocomial Infection in Surgical Patients

  • Cristina Belío-Blasco (a1), M. Antonia Torres-Fernández-Gil (a1), J. Lorenzo Echeverría-Echarri (a2) and Luis I. Gómez-López (a3)

Abstract

Objective:

To compare the sensitivity and specificity of two retrospective active surveillance methods based on review of the medical record and review of the discharge form in identifying nosocomial infection, taking the prospective surveillance method as the reference standard.

Design:

Blind comparison of three active nosocomial infection surveillance methods.

Setting:

Department of General Surgery of a tertiary-care hospital with a referral population of 266,000 people.

Methods:

All operated patients admitted to the Department of Surgery for more than 24 hours and discharged from January 1, 1994, to December 31, 1994, were included. Prospective surveillance consisted of daily review of the patient's record during hospitalization. Retrospective surveillance consisted of review of the medical record and the discharge form. Sensitivity and specificity of both retrospective methods were calculated.

Results:

Of the 1,514 patients included in the study, 1,476 (97.5%) were reviewed by means of the retrospective surveillance system. A total of 20, 8, and 4 hours per week was needed for the active prospective system, review of the medical record, and review of the hospital discharge form, respectively. The documented cumulative incidence of nosocomial infection was 21.8% for the prospective system, 19.6% for review of the medical record, and 12.6% for review of the discharge form. The overall sensitivity of review of the medical record was 88% and of the discharge form 56%, with a specificity of 99%. For review of the medical record, the highest sensitivity was 93%, for urinary tract infections; for review of the discharge form, the highest was 57%, for surgical-wound infection.

Conclusions:

The retrospective method of review of the medical record was the most efficient active surveillance strategy in detecting nosocomial infection in surgical patients

Copyright

Corresponding author

Service of Preventive Medicine, Hospital San Millán, Autonomía de la Rioja 3, E-26004 Logroño, La Rioja, Spain

References

Hide All
1.Perl, TM. Surveillance, reporting, and the use of computers. In: Wenzel, RP, ed. Prevention and Control of Nosocomial Infections. London, UK: Williams & Wilkins, 1987:139176.
2.Haley, RW, Gaynes, RP, Aber, RC, Bennett, JV. Surveillance of nosocomial infections. In: Bennett, JV, Brachman, PS, eds. Hospital Infections. 3rd ed. Boston, MA: Little Brown & Co, 1992:79108.
3.Bartlett, CLR, Efficacy of different surveillance systems in detecting hospital-acquired infections. Chemioterapia 1987;6:152155.
4.Eickhoff, TC, Brachman, PW, Bennett, JV, Brown, JF. Surveillance of nosocomial infections in community hospitals, I: surveillance methods, effectiveness, and initial results. J Infect Dis 1969;120:305317.
5.Freeman, J, McGowan, JE Jr. Methodologie issues in hospital epidemiology, I: rates, case-finding, and interpretation. Rev Infect Dis 1981;3:658667.
6.Abrutyn, E, Talbot, GH. Surveillance strategies: a primer. Infect Control 1987;8:459464.
7.Frey, KA, Briggs, J, Broadhead, WE. Postdischarge, postoperative nosocomial infection surveillance using random sampling. Am J Infect Control 1990;18:383385.
8.Weigelt, JA, Dryer, D, Haley, RW. The necessity and efficiency of wound surveillance after discharge. Arch Surg 1992;127:7782.
9.Birnbaum, D, King, LA. Disadvantages of infection surveillance by medical record chart review. Am J Infect Control 1981;9:1517.
10.Haley, RW, Schaberg, DR, McClish, DK, Quade, D, Crossley, KB, Culver, DH, et al. The accuracy of retrospective chart review in measuring nosocomial infection rates. Results of validation studies in pilot hospitals. Am J Epidemiol 1980;111:516533.
11. Ministry of Health. Orden Ministerial (20915) de 6 de septiembre de 1984 por la que se regula la obligatoriedad del informe de alta. Boletín Oficial del Estado. Gaceta de Madrid, Spain. September 14, 1984; 221:2668526686.
12.National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council. Postoperative wound infections: the influence of ultraviolet irradiation of the operating room and of various other factors. Ann Surg 1964;160(suppl 2):1132.
13.Nichols, RL. Classification of the surgical wound: a time for reassessment and simplification. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1993;14:253254.
14.Keats, AS. The ASA classification of physical status. A recapitulation. Anesthesiology 1978;49:233236.
15.Owens, WD, Felts, JA, Spitznagel, EL Jr.ASA physical status classification: a study of consistency of ratings. Anesthesiology 1978;49:239243.
16.Culver, DH, Horan, TC, Gaynes, RP, Martone, WJ, Jarvis, WR, Emori, TG, et al. Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedure, and patient risk index. Am J Med 1991;91(suppl 3B):152S157S.
17.Garner, JS, Jarvis, WR, Emori, TG, Horan, TC, Hughes, JM. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988. Am J Infect Control 1988;16:128140.
18.Horan, TC, Gaynes, RP, Martone, WJ, Jarvis, WR, Emori, TG. CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1992;13:606608.
19.Birnbaum, D, Sheps, SB. Validation of new tests. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1991;12:622624.
20.Saenz Gonzalez, MC, Rodrigo, N, Gutiérrez, JL, Valero, J, Nuftez, JC, Meléndez, D. Incidencia de la infectión hospitalaria en un hospital universitario. Med Clin (Bare) 1989;92;213216.
21.Scheckler, WE, Peterson, PJ. Nosocomial infections in 15 rural Wisconsin hospitals—results and conclusions from 6 months of comprehensive surveillance. Infect Control 1989;7:397402.
22.Landry, SL, Donowitz, LG, Wenzel, RP.Hospital-wide surveillance: perspective for the practitioner. Am J Infect Control 1982;10:6667.
23.Holzheimer, RG, Quoika, P, Pätzmann, D, Füssle, R.Nosocomial infections in general surgery: surveillance report from a German university clinic. Infection 1990;18:219225.
24.Vitella, A, Prat, A, Bare, M, Bayas, JM, Asenjo, MA, Salleras, L. Riesgo de infección nosocomial de los pacientes ancianos ingresados en un hospital universitario. Med Clin (Bare) 1993;100:128131.
25.Carrasco, M, Delgado, A, Fernández, C, Prieto Valiente, L, Jimeno Maestro, J, Andradas Aragonés, E. Vigilancia epidemiológica de la infección hospitalaria. Análisis preliminar de una serie de cinco años. Med Clin (Bare) 1990;95:201206.
26.De Juan García, S, González Monte, C, Pinazo Murria, M, Prats Fornell, J, Escoms Trullenque, R, Piqueras Altabella, M, et al. Infecciones nosocomiales múltiples. Un estudio de incidencia. Med Clin (Bare) 1996;107:4144.
27.Brawley, RL, Weber, DJ, Samsa, GRRutala, WA. Multiple nosocomial infections. An incidence study. Am J Epidemiol 1989;130:769780.
28.Cruse, PJE, Foord, R. The epidemiology of wound infection. A 10-year prospective study of 62,939 wounds. Surg Clin North Am 1980;60:2740.
29.Cruse, P. Wound infection surveillance. Rev Infect Dis 1981;3:734737.
30.Cainzos, M, Lozano, J, Balibrea, JL, Dávila, D, Potei, J, Gómez Alonso, A, et al. La infección postoperatoria: estudio multicéntrico prospective y controlado. Cir Esp 1990;48:481490.
31.Narbona, B, Dávila, D. Frecuencia de la infección quirúrgica en cirugía digestiva. Estudio de 15.936 heridas en el Servicio de Cirugía General B del Hospital General de Valencia. Cir Esp 1987;62:214223.
32.Gil-Egea, MJ, Pi-Sunyer, MT, Verdaguer, A, Sanz, F, Sitges-Serra, A, Torre Eleizegui, L. Surgical wound infections: prospective study of 4,468 clean wounds. Infect Control 1987;8:277280.
33.Rabanaque, J. Análisis de Costos de la Infección Nosocomial. Zaragoza, Spain: University of Zaragoza; 1992. Thesis.
34.Freeman, J, McGowan, JE Jr.Methodologie issues in hospital epidemiology, II: time and accuracy in estimation. Rev Infect Dis 1981;3:668677.
35.Delgado-Rodríguez, M, Medina Cuadros, M, Martínez Gallego, O, Fariñas Alvarez, C, Sillero Arenas, M. Frecuencia de la vigilancia de la infección nosocomial en cirugía. Med Clin (Bare) 1997;108:171174.
36.Lizan-Garcia, M, García-Caballero, J, Asensio-Vegas, A. Risk factors for surgical-wound infection in general surgery: a prospective study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1997;18:310315.
37.Egoz, N, Michaeli, D. A program for surveillance of hospital-acquired infections in a general hospital: a two-year experience. Rev Infect Dis 1981;3:649657.
38.Britt, MR, Schleupner, CJ, Matsumiya, S. Severity of underlying disease as a predictor of nosocomial infection. Utility in the control of nosocomial infection. JAMA 1978;239:10471051.
39.Delgado-Rodríguez, M, Cueto-Espinar, A, Rodríguez-Contreras, R, Gálvez-Vargas, R. Quantification of risk factors in hospital infection at a surgical service. Eur J Epidemiol 1988;4:235241.
40.Zoutman, D, Pearce, P, McKenzie, M, Taylor, G. Surgical wound infections occurring in day surgery patients. Am J Infect Control 1990;18:277282.
41.Wenzel, RP, Osterman, CAHunting, KJ, Gwaltney, JM Jr. Hospital-acquired infections, I: surveillance in a university hospital. Am J Epidemiol 1976;103:251260.
42.Costel, EE, Mitchell, S, Kaiser, AB. Abbreviated surveillance of nosocomial urinary tract infections: a new approach. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1985;6:1113.
43.Simchen, E, Wax, Y, Pevsner, B, Erda], M, Michel, J, Modan, M, et al. The Israeli study of surgical infections (ISSI), I: methods for developing a standardized surveillance system for a multicenter study of surgical infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1988;9:232240.
44.Massanari, RM, Wilkerson, K, Streed, SA, Hierholzer, WJ Jr. Reliability of reporting nosocomial infections in the discharge abstract and implications for receipt of revenues under prospective reimbursement. Am J Public Health 1987;77:561564.
45.Freeman, J, McGowan, JE Jr. Risk factors for hospital infection. J Infect Dis 1978;138:811819.
46.Glenister, H, Taylor, L, Bartlett, C, Cooke, M, Sedgwick, J, Leigh, D. An assessment of selective surveillance methods for detecting hospital-acquired infection. Am J Med 1991;91 (suppl 3B):121S124S.

Evaluation of Two Retrospective Active Surveillance Methods for the Detection of Nosocomial Infection in Surgical Patients

  • Cristina Belío-Blasco (a1), M. Antonia Torres-Fernández-Gil (a1), J. Lorenzo Echeverría-Echarri (a2) and Luis I. Gómez-López (a3)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed