Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Electronic Medical Records: Unintended Consequences of a Duplicitous Default Setting

  • Tariq Iqbal (a1) and Edward C. Oldfield (a1)
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Electronic Medical Records: Unintended Consequences of a Duplicitous Default Setting
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Electronic Medical Records: Unintended Consequences of a Duplicitous Default Setting
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Electronic Medical Records: Unintended Consequences of a Duplicitous Default Setting
      Available formats
      ×

Abstract

  • An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided below. To view the full text please use the links above to select your preferred format.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Eastern Virginia Medical School, 825 Fairfax Avenue, Suite 410, Norfolk, VA 23507 (bluestarl23@ gmail.com)

References

Hide All
1.Weinstein, MP, Relier, LB, Murphy, JR, Lichtenstein, KA. The clinical significance of positive blood cultures: a comprehensive analysis of 500 episodes of bacteremia and fungemia in adults. I. Laboratory and epidemiologic observations. Rev Infect Dis 1983;5:3553.
2.Cockerill, FR III, Wilson, JW, Vetter, EA, et al.Optimal testing parameters for blood cultures. Clin Infect Dis 2004;38:17241730.
3.Weinstein, MP, Towns, ML, Quartey, SM, et al.The clinical significance of positive blood cultures in the 1990s: a prospective comprehensive evaluation of the microbiology, epidemiology, and outcome of bacteremia and fungemia in adults. Clin Infect Dis 1997;24:584602.
4.MacGregor, RR, Beaty, HN. Evaluation of positive blood cultures: guidelines for early differentiation of contaminated from valid positive cultures. Arch Intern Med 1972;130:8487.
5.Schifman, RB, Strand, CL, Meier, FA, Howanitz, PJ. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1998;122(3):216221.
6.Aronson, MD, Bor, DH. Blood cultures. Ann Intern Med 1987;106:246253.
7.Reimer, LG, Weinstein, MP, Wilson, ML. Update on the detection of bacteremia and fungemia. Clin Microbiol Rev 1997;10:444465.
8.Weinstein, MP. Current blood culture methods and systems: clinical concepts, technology, and interpretation of results. Clin Infect Dis 1996;23:4046.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed