Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Analysis and Presentation of Cumulative Antimicrobial Susceptibility Data (Antibiograms): Substantial Variability Across Medical Centers in the United States

  • Ebbing Lautenbach (a1) and Irving Nachamkin (a2)

Abstract

We found substantial variability in approaches to constructing antibiograms at 65 United States medical centers. Laboratories in teaching hospitals and those with more personnel were significantly more likely to offer sophisticated antibiogram approaches, including the compiling of unit-specific susceptibility data and the reporting of temporal trends in susceptibility data.

Copyright

Corresponding author

University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, 825 Blockley Hall, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6021 (elautenb@cceb.med.upenn.edu)

References

Hide All
1.Shlaes, DM, Gerding, DN, John, JF, et al. Society of Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) and Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) Joint Committee on the Prevention of Antimicrobial Resistance: guidelines for the prevention of antimicrobial resistance in hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1997; 18:275291.
2.Fridkin, SK, Edwards, JR, Tenover, FC, Gaynes, R, McGowan, JE Jr. Antimicrobial resistance prevalence rates in hospital antibiograms reflect prevalence rates among pathogens associated with hospital-acquired infections. Clin Infect Dis 2001;33:324330.
3.Goldmann, DA, Weinstein, RA, Wenzel, RP, et al. Strategies to prevent and control the emergence and spread of antimicrobial-resistant microorganisms in hospitals: a challenge to hospital leadership. JAMA 1996; 275:234240.
4.Peterson, LR, Hamilton, JD, Baron, EJ, et al. Role of clinical microbiology laboratories in the management and control of infectious diseases and the delivery of health care. Clin Infect Dis 2001; 32:605611.
5.National Committee For Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS). Analysis and presentation of cumulative antimicrobial susceptibility test data: approved standard. NCCLS document M39-A. Wayne, PA: NCCLS; 2002.
6.Munson, EL, Diekema, DJ, Beekmann, SE, Chapin, KC, Doern, GV. Detection and treatment of bloodstream infection: laboratory reporting and antimicrobial management. J Clin Microbiol 2003; 41:495497.
7.Ernst, EJ, Diekema, DJ, BootsMiller, BJ, et al. Are United States hospitals following national guidelines for the analysis and presentation of cumulative antimicrobial susceptibility data? Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2004; 49:141145.
8.Directory of Pathology Training Programs in the U.S. and Canada 2004-5. 36th ed. Bethesda, MD: Intersociety Committee on Pathology Information; 2003.
9.O'Brien, TF. The global epidemic nature of antimicrobial resistance and the need to monitor and manage it locally. Clin Infect Dis 1997; 24(Suppl 1):S2S8.
10.Bryce, EA, Smith, JA. Focused microbiological surveillance and gram-negative beta-lactamase–mediated resistance in an intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1995; 16:331334.
11.Kaufman, D, Haas, CE, Edinger, R, Hollick, G. Antibiotic susceptibility in the surgical intensive care unit compared with the hospital-wide antibiogram. Arch Surg 1998; 133:10411045.
12.Leibovici, L, Shraga, I, Drucker, M, Konigsberger, H, Samra, Z, Pitlik, SD. The benefit of appropriate empirical antibiotic treatment in patients with bloodstream infection. J Intern Med 1998; 244:379386.
13.Ibrahim, EH, Sherman, G, Ward, S, Fraser, VJ, Kollef, MH. The influence of inadequate antimicrobial treatment of bloodstream infections on patient outcomes in the ICU setting. Chest 2000; 118:146155.
14.Harbarth, S, Garbino, J, Pugin, J, Romand, JA, Lew, D, Pittet, D. Inappropriate initial antimicrobial therapy and its effect on survival in a clinical trial of immunomodulating therapy for severe sepsis. Am J Med 2003; 115:529535.
15.Boyce, JM. Are the epidemiology and microbiology of methicillin-resis-tant Staphylococcus aureus changing? JAMA 1998; 279:623624.
16.Stevenson, KB, Samore, M, Barbera, J, et al. Detection of antimicrobial resistance by small rural hospital microbiology laboratories: comparison of survey responses with current NCCLS laboratory standards. Diagn Microbiol Infect Ds 2003; 47:303311.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed