Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T01:29:09.230Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Air Contamination around Patients Colonized with Multidrug-Resistant Organisms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Marie Charlotte Bernard ,
Philippe Lanotte ,
Christine Lawrence ,
Alain Goudeau  and
Louis Bernard
Marie Charlotte Bernard
Affiliation:
INSERM U618, Université François Rabelais, Tours, France
Philippe Lanotte
Affiliation:
CHRU de Tours, Service de Bactériologie et Virologie, Tours, France
Christine Lawrence
Affiliation:
AP-HP, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, Garches, France
Alain Goudeau
Affiliation:
CHRU de Tours, Service de Bactériologie et Virologie, Tours, France
Louis Bernard*
Affiliation:
INSERM U618, Université François Rabelais, Tours, France CHRU de Tours, Service de Maladies Infectieuses, Tours, France
*
CHRU de Tours, Service de Médecine Interne et Maladies Infectieuses, 2 Boulevard Tonnellé, F-37044 Tours, France (l.bernard@chu-tours.fr)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Care-related infections are a major public health concern. Their transmission can be associated with environmental factors. This study looks at air contamination around 45 patients colonized with multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs). We found that 30 hospital rooms (67%) were contaminated with MDRO species and 10 rooms (22%) were contaminated with at least 1 MDRO.

Type
Concise Communication
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 33 , Issue 9 , September 2012 , pp. 949 - 951
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Arias, CA, Murray, BE. Antibiotic-resistant bugs in the 21st century—a clinical super-challenge. N Engl J Med 2009;360(5):439–443.10.1056/NEJMp0804651Google Scholar
2. Collins, AS. Preventing health care-associated infections. In: Hughes, RG, ed. Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2008.Google Scholar
3. Weber, DJ, Rutala, WA, Miller, MB, Huslage, K, Sickbert-Bennett, E. Role of hospital surfaces in the transmission of emerging health care-associated pathogens: norovirus, Clostridium difficile, and Acinetobacter species. Am J Infect Control 2010;38(5 suppl 1): S25–S33.Google Scholar
4. Shiomori, T, Miyamoto, H, Makishima, K, et al. Evaluation of bedmaking-related airborne and surface methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus contamination. J Hosp Infect 2002;50(1):30–35.10.1053/jhin.2001.1136Google Scholar
5. Gehanno, JF, Louvel, A, Nouvellon, M, Caillard J-F, Pestel-Caron, M. Aerial dispersal of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in hospital rooms by infected or colonized patients. J Hosp Infect 2009;71(3):256–262.Google Scholar
6. Wilson, RD, Huang, SJ, McLean, AS. The correlation between airborne methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with the presence of MRSA colonized patients in a general intensive care unit. Anaesth Intensive Care 2004;32(2):202–209.Google Scholar
7. Choukri, F, Menotti, J, Sarfati, C, et al. Quantification and spread of Pneumocystis jirovecii in the surrounding air of patients with Pneumocystis pneumonia . Clin Infect Dis 2010;51(3):259–265.Google Scholar
8. Best, EL, Fawley, WN, Parnell, P, Wilcox, MH. The potential for airborne dispersal of Clostridium difficile from symptomatic patients. Clin Infect Dis 2010;50(11):1450–1457.Google Scholar
9. Shore, AC, Rossney, AS, Brennan, OM, et al. Characterization of a novel arginine catabolic mobile element (ACME) and staphylococcal chromosomal cassette mec composite island with significant homology to Staphylococcus epidermidis ACME type II in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus genotype ST22-MRSA-IV. Antxmicrob Agents Chemother 2011;55(5):1896–1905.Google Scholar