Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Use of Central Venous Catheter and Peripheral Venous Catheter as Risk Factors for Nosocomial Bloodstream Infection in Very-Low-Birth-Weight Infants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015


Christine Geffers
Affiliation:
National Reference Center for the Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Germany Institute for Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité-University Medicine Berlin
Anne Gastmeier
Affiliation:
St. Vincent Hospital, Brunswick, Germany
Frank Schwab
Affiliation:
National Reference Center for the Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Germany Institute for Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité-University Medicine Berlin
Katrin Groneberg
Affiliation:
National Reference Center for the Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Germany Institute for Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité-University Medicine Berlin
Henning Rüden
Affiliation:
National Reference Center for the Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Germany Institute for Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité-University Medicine Berlin
Petra Gastmeier
Affiliation:
National Reference Center for the Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Germany Institute for Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité-University Medicine Berlin
Corresponding

Abstract

Objective.

To describe the relationship between the use of central and peripheral venous catheters and the risk of nosocomial, primary, laboratory-confirmed bloodstream infection (BSI) for neonates with a birth weight less than 1,500 g (very-low-birth-weight [VLBW] infants).

Methods.

Cox proportional hazard regression analysis with time-dependent variable was used to determine the risk factors for the occurrence of BSI in a cohort of VLBW infants. We analyzed previously collected surveillance data from the German national nosocomial surveillance system for VLBW infants. All VLBW infants in 22 participating neonatal departments who had a complete daily record of patient information were included.

Results.

Of 2,126 VLBW infants, 261 (12.3%) developed a BSI. The incidence density for BSI was 3.3 per 1,000 patient-days. The multivariate analysis identified the following significant independent risk factors for BSI: lower birth weight (hazard ratio [HR], 1.1–2.2), vaginal delivery (HR, 1.5), central venous catheter use (HR, 6.2) or peripheral venous catheter use (HR, 6.0) within 2 days before developing BSI, and the individual departments (HR, 0.0–4.6).

Conclusions.

After adjusting for other risk factors, use of peripheral venous catheter and use of central venous catheter were significantly related to occurrence of BSI in VLBW infants.


Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

1. Stevenson, DK, Wright, LL, Lemons, JA, et al. Very-low-birth-weight outcomes of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network, January 1993 through December 1994. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179(6 Pt 1):16321639.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Stoll, BJ, Gordon, T, Korones, SB, et al. Late-onset sepsis in very-low-birth-weight neonates: a report from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. J Pediatr 1996;129(1:63-71.Google ScholarPubMed
3. Stoll, BJ, Hansen, N, Fanaroff, AA, et al. Late-onset sepsis in very-low-birth-weight neonates: the experience of the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics 2002;110(2 Pt 1):285291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Fanaroff, AA, Korones, SB, Wright, LL, et al. Incidence, presenting features, risk factors and significance of late onset septicemia in very-low-birth-weight infants. The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1998;17(7): 593598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Brodie, SB, Sands, KE, Gray, JE, et al. Occurrence of nosocomial bloodstream infections in six neonatal intensive care units. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2000;19(1):5665.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Makhoul, IR, Sujov, P, Smolkin, T, et al. Epidemiological, clinical, and microbiological characteristics of late-onset sepsis among very-low-birth-weight infants in Israel: a national survey. Pediatrics 2002;109(1):3439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Lopez Sastre, JB, Coto Cotallo, D, Fernandez Colomer, B. Neonatal sepsis of nosocomial origin: an epidemiological study from the “Grupo de Hospitales Castrillo.” J Perinat Med 2002;30(2:149-157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Gaynes, RP, Edwards, JR, Jarvis, WR, et al. Nosocomial infections among neonates in high-risk nurseries in the United States. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. Pediatrics 1996;98(3 Pt 1):357361.Google ScholarPubMed
9. Avila-Figueroa, C, Goldmann, DA, Richardson, DK, et al. Intravenous lipid emulsions are the major determinant of coagulase-negative staphylococcal bacteremia in very-low-birth-weight newborns. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1998;17(1):1017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Benjamin, DK Jr, Miller, W, Garges, H, et al. Bacteremia, central catheters, and neonates: when to pull the line. Pediatrics 2001;107(6:1272-1276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Gastmeier, P, Geffers, C, Schwab, F, et al. Development of a surveillance system for nosocomial infections: the component for neonatal intensive care units in Germany. J Hosp Infect 2004;57(2:126131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Geffers, C, Baerwolff, S, Schwab, F, Gastmeier, P. Incidence of healthcare-associated infections in high-risk neonates: results from the German surveillance system for very-low-birth-weight infants. J Hosp Infect 2008;68(3:214221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Moro, ML, De Toni, A, Stolfì, I, et al. Risk factors for nosocomial sepsis in newborn intensive and intermediate care units. Eur J Pediatr 1996;155(4:315322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Reiter, PD, Novak, K, Valuck, RJ, et al. Effect of a closed drug-delivery system on the incidence of nosocomial and catheter-related bloodstream infections in infants. Epidemiol Infect 2006;134(2:285291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Chien, LY, Macnab, Y, Aziz, K, et al. Variations in central venous catheter-related infection risks among Canadian neonatal intensive care units. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2002;21(6:505511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. O'Grady, NP, Alexander, M, Dellinger, EP, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. The Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Pediatrics 2002;110(5):e51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Cronin, WA, Germanson, TP, Donowitz, LG. Intravascular catheter colonization and related bloodstream infection in critically ill neonates. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1990;11(6):301308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Parellada, JA, Moise, AA, Hegemier, S, Gest, AL. Percutaneous central catheters and peripheral intravenous catheters have similar infection rates in very-low-birth-weight infants. J Perinatol 1999;19(4:251254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Ainsworth, SB, Clerihew, L, McGuire, W. Percutaneous central venous catheters versus peripheral cannulae for delivery of parenteral nutrition in neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;(3):CD004219.Google Scholar
20. van der Zwet, WC, Kaiser, AM, van Elburg, RM, et al. Nosocomial infections in a Dutch neonatal intensive care unit: surveillance study with definitions for infection specifically adapted for neonates. J Hosp Infect 2005;61(4:300-311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Makhoul, IR, Smolkin, T, Hanna-Elias, R, Kassis, I, Tamir, A, Sujov, P. Predictors and empiric antimicrobial therapy of late-onset sepsis in the neonatal intensive care unit [in Hebrew]. Harefuah 2006;145(2:98-102, 167.Google Scholar
22. Ronnestad, A, Abrahamsen, TG, Medbo, S, et al. Septicemia in the first week of life in a Norwegian national cohort of extremely premature infants. Pediatrics 2005;115(3):e262e268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Haque, KN, Khan, MA, Kerry, S, et al. Pattern of culture-proven neonatal sepsis in a district general hospital in the United Kingdom. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2004;25(9:759-764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Carrieri, MP, Stolfi, I, Moro, ML. Intercenter variability and time of onset: two crucial issues in the analysis of risk factors for nosocomial sepsis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2003;22(7:599-609.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25. Pessoa-Silva, CL, Miyasaki, CH, de Almeida, MF, et al. Neonatal late-onset bloodstream infection: attributable mortality, excess of length of stay and risk factors. Eur J Epidemiol 2001;17(8:715-720.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26. Beck-Sague, CM, Azimi, P, Fonseca, SN, et al. Bloodstream infections in neonatal intensive care unit patients: results of a multicenter study. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1994;13(12:11101116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27. Couto, RC, Pedrosa, TM, Tofani Cde, P, Pedroso, ER. Risk factors for nosocomial infection in a neonatal intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;27(6:571-575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. Mahieu, LM, De Muynck, AO, Ieven, MM, et al. Risk factors for central vascular catheter-associated bloodstream infections among patients in a neonatal intensive care unit. J Hosp Infect 2001;48(2:108116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29. Herruzo Cabrera, R, Diez Sebastian, J, Baylin Larios, A, et al. Septicemia associated with central venous catheterization in a children's hospital. A multivariate study [in Spanish]. Med Clin (Bare) 1998;111(18:687-691.Google Scholar
30. Maas, A, Flament, P, Pardou, A, et al. Central venous catheter-related bacteraemia in critically ill neonates: risk factors and impact of a prevention programme. J Hosp Infect 1998;40(3:211224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31. Shetty, SS, Harrison, LH, Hajjeh, RA, et al. Determining risk factors for candidemia among newborn infants from population-based surveillance: Baltimore, Maryland, 1998-2000. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2005;24(7:601-604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32. Makhoul, IR, Sujov, P, Smolkin, T, et al. Pathogen-specific early mortality in very-low-birth-weight infants with late-onset sepsis: a national survey. Clin Infect Dis 2005;40(2:218224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33. Phibbs, CS, Baker, LC, Caughey, AB, et al. Level and volume of neonatal intensive care and mortality in very-low-birth-weight infants. N Engl J Med 2007;356(21):21652175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34. Bartels, DB, Wypij, D, Wenzlaff, P, et al. Hospital volume and neonatal mortality among very-low-birth-weight infants. Pediatrics 2006;117(6): 22062214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35. Ferguson, JK, Gill, A. Risk-stratified nosocomial infection surveillance in a neonatal intensive care unit: report on 24 months of surveillance. J Paediatr Child Health 1996;32(6:525531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36. Stover, BH, Shulman, ST, Bratcher, DF, et al. Nosocomial infection rates in US children's hospitals' neonatal and pediatric intensive care units. Am J Infect Control 2001;29(3):152157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2004, issued October 2004. Am J Infect Control 2004;32(8):470485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Altmetric attention score


Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 15 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 3rd December 2020. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Hostname: page-component-79f79cbf67-jgbff Total loading time: 0.913 Render date: 2020-12-03T07:24:08.417Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "0", "openAccess": "0", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags last update: Thu Dec 03 2020 07:06:32 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) Feature Flags: { "metrics": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "peerReview": true, "crossMark": true, "comments": true, "relatedCommentaries": true, "subject": true, "clr": false, "languageSwitch": true }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Use of Central Venous Catheter and Peripheral Venous Catheter as Risk Factors for Nosocomial Bloodstream Infection in Very-Low-Birth-Weight Infants
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Use of Central Venous Catheter and Peripheral Venous Catheter as Risk Factors for Nosocomial Bloodstream Infection in Very-Low-Birth-Weight Infants
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Use of Central Venous Catheter and Peripheral Venous Catheter as Risk Factors for Nosocomial Bloodstream Infection in Very-Low-Birth-Weight Infants
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *