Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-rn2sj Total loading time: 0.235 Render date: 2022-08-09T11:52:29.170Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true
  • English
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology

Article contents

A randomized trial of ultraviolet-C (UV-C) light versus sodium hypochlorite delivered by an electrostatic sprayer for adjunctive decontamination of hospital rooms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2022

Matthew G. Carlisle ,
William A. Rutala ,
Jennifer L. Cadnum ,
Brigid M. Wilson Open the ORCID record for Brigid M. Wilson[Opens in a new window] ,
Abhishek Deshpande  and
Curtis J. Donskey
Matthew G. Carlisle
Affiliation:
Research Service, Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
William A. Rutala
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Jennifer L. Cadnum
Affiliation:
Research Service, Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
Brigid M. Wilson
Affiliation:
Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
Abhishek Deshpande
Affiliation:
Center for Value-Based Care Research, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
Curtis J. Donskey*
Affiliation:
Center for Value-Based Care Research, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
*
Author for correspondence: Curtis J. Donskey, MD, E-mail: Curtis.Donskey@va.gov
Get access Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In a randomized trial, adjunctive ultraviolet-C light treatment with a room decontamination device and sodium hypochlorite delivered via an electrostatic sprayer were similarly effective in significantly reducing residual healthcare-associated pathogen contamination on floors and high-touch surfaces after manual cleaning and disinfection. Less time until the room was ready to be occupied by another patient was required for electrostatic spraying.

Type
Concise Communication
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , First View , pp. 1 - 4
Check for updates
Creative Commons
This is a work of the US Government and is not subject to copyright protection within the United States. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America.
Copyright
© Department of Veterans Affairs, 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Donskey, CJ. Decontamination devices in healthcare facilities: practical issues and emerging applications. Am J Infect Control 2019;47S:A23–A28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanamori, H, Rutala, WA, Gergen, MF, et al. Microbial assessment of healthcare-associated pathogens on various environmental sites in patient rooms after terminal room disinfection. Open Forum Infect Dis 2021;8:ofab008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutala, WA, Kanamori, H, Gergen, MF, et al. Enhanced disinfection leads to reduction of microbial contamination and a decrease in patient colonization and infection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;39:1118–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cadnum, JL, Jencson, AL, Livingston, SH, et al. Evaluation of an electrostatic spray disinfectant technology for rapid decontamination of portable equipment and large open areas in the era of SARS-CoV-2. Am J Infect Control 2020;48:951–954.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donskey, CJ. Beyond high-touch surfaces: portable equipment and floors as potential sources of transmission of healthcare-associated pathogens. Am J Infect Control 2019;47S:A90–A95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koganti, S, Alhmidi, H, Tomas, ME, Cadnum, JL, Jencson, A, Donskey, CJ. Evaluation of hospital floors as a potential source of pathogen dissemination using a nonpathogenic virus as a surrogate marker. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37:1374–1377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Redmond, SN, Pearlmutter, BS, Ng-Wong, YK, et al. Timing and route of contamination of hospitalized patient rooms with healthcare-associated pathogens. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2021;42:1076–1081.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deshpande, A, Cadnum, JL, Fertelli, D, et al. Are hospital floors an underappreciated reservoir for transmission of healthcare-associated pathogens? Am J Infect Control 2017;45:336–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearlmutter, BS, Haq, MF, Cadnum, JL, Jencson, AL, Carlisle, M, Donskey, CJ. Efficacy of relatively low-cost ultraviolet-C light devices against Candida auris . Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2021. doi: 10.1017/ice.2021.206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tanner, WD, Leecaster, MK, Zhang, Y, et al. Environmental contamination of contact precaution and non-contact precaution patient rooms in six acute-care facilities. Clin Infect Dis 2021;72 suppl 1:S8–S16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

A randomized trial of ultraviolet-C (UV-C) light versus sodium hypochlorite delivered by an electrostatic sprayer for adjunctive decontamination of hospital rooms
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

A randomized trial of ultraviolet-C (UV-C) light versus sodium hypochlorite delivered by an electrostatic sprayer for adjunctive decontamination of hospital rooms
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

A randomized trial of ultraviolet-C (UV-C) light versus sodium hypochlorite delivered by an electrostatic sprayer for adjunctive decontamination of hospital rooms
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *