Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-22T17:52:42.528Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of Staff Behavior on Infectious Risk in Operating Rooms: What Is the Evidence?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2015

Gabriel Birgand*
Affiliation:
French Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM), Infection, Antimicrobials, Modelling, Evolution (IAME), UMR 1137, F-75018 Paris, France Université Paris Diderot, IAME, UMR 1137, Sorbonne Paris Cité, F-75018 Paris, France Assistance publique–Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Bichat, Infection Control Unit, F-75018 Paris, France
Philippe Saliou
Affiliation:
Brest Teaching Hospital, Infection Control Unit, Brest, France
Jean-Christophe Lucet
Affiliation:
French Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM), Infection, Antimicrobials, Modelling, Evolution (IAME), UMR 1137, F-75018 Paris, France Université Paris Diderot, IAME, UMR 1137, Sorbonne Paris Cité, F-75018 Paris, France Assistance publique–Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Bichat, Infection Control Unit, F-75018 Paris, France
*
Address correspondence to Gabriel Birgand, Infection Control Unit, Bichat-Claude Bernard Teaching Hospital, AP-HP, 46 rue Henri Huchard 75018 Paris (gbirgand@gmail.com).

Abstract

SUMMARY

A systematic literature review was performed to assess the impact of surgical-staff behaviors on the risk of surgical site infections. Published data are limited, heterogeneous, and weakened by several methodological flaws, underlying the need for more studies with accurate tools.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the current literature regarding the impact of surgical-staff behaviors on the risk of surgical-site infection (SSI).

DESIGN

Systematic literature review.

METHODS

We searched the Medline, EMBASE, Ovid, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases for original articles about the impact of intraoperative behaviors on the risk of SSI published in English before September 2013.

RESULTS

We retrieved 27 original articles reporting data on number of people in the operating room (n=14), door openings (n=14; number [n=6], frequency [n=7], reasons [n=4], or duration [n=3]), surgical-team discipline (evidence of distraction; n=4), compliance with traffic measures (n=6), or simulated behaviors (n=3). Most (59%) articles were published in 2009–2013. End points were the 30-day SSI rate (n=8), air-particle count (n=2), or microbiological air counts (n=6); 11 studies were only descriptive. Number of people in the operating room and SSI rate or airborne contaminants (particle/bacteria) were correlated in 2 studies. Door openings and airborne bacteria counts were correlated in 2 observational studies and 1 experimental study. Two cohort studies showed a significant association between surgeon interruptions/distraction or noise and SSI rate. The level of evidence was low in all studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Published data about the impact of operating-room behaviors on the risk of infection are limited and heterogeneous. All studies exhibit major methodological flaws. More studies with accurate tools should be performed to address the influence of operating room behaviors on the infectious risk.

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015;36(1): 93–106

Type
Review Article
Copyright
© 2015 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Smyth, ETM, McIlvenny, G, Enstone, JE, et al., on behalf of the Hospital Infection Society Prevalence Survey Steering Group. Four country healthcare associated infection prevalence survey 2006: overview of the results. J Hosp Infect 2008;69:230248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.INVS. Enquète nationale de prévalence des infections nosocomiales, juin 2012, 2007. www.invs.sante.fr. Accessed May 12, 2014.Google Scholar
3.Engemann, JJ, Carmeli, Y, Cosgrove, SE, et al. Adverse clinical and economic outcomes attributable to methicillin resistance among patients with Staphylococcus aureus surgical site infection. Clin Infect Dis 2003;36:592598.Google Scholar
4.Kirkland, KB, Briggs, JP, Trivette, SL, Wilkinson, WE, Sexton, DJ. The impact of surgical-site infections in the 1990s: attributable mortality, excess length of hospitalization, and extra costs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999;20:725730.Google Scholar
5.Astagneau, P, Rioux, C, Golliot, F, Brücker, G, INCISO Network Study Group. Morbidity and mortality associated with surgical site infections: results from the 1997–1999 INCISO surveillance. J Hosp Infect 2001;48:267274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Mangram, AJ, Horan, TC, Pearson, ML, Silver, LC, Jarvis, WR. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999;20:250278.Google Scholar
7.Defez, C, Fabbro-Peray, P, Cazaban, M, Boudemaghe, T, Sotto, A, Daurès, JP. Additional direct medical costs of nosocomial infections: an estimation from a cohort of patients in a French university hospital. J Hosp Infect 2008;68:130136.Google Scholar
8.Plowman, R, Graves, N, Griffin, MA, et al. The rate and cost of hospital-acquired infections occurring in patients admitted to selected specialties of a district general hospital in England and the national burden imposed. J Hosp Infect 2001;47:198209.Google Scholar
9.Ayliffe, GA. Role of the environment of the operating suite in surgical wound infection. Rev Infect Dis 1991;13(Suppl 10):S800S804.Google Scholar
10.Whyte, W, Hambraeus, A, Laurell, G, Hoborn, J. The relative importance of routes and sources of wound contamination during general surgery. I. Non-airborne. J Hosp Infect 1991;18:93107.Google Scholar
11.Whyte, W, Hambraeus, A, Laurell, G, Hoborn, J. The relative importance of the routes and sources of wound contamination during general surgery. II. Airborne. J Hosp Infect 1992;22:4154.Google Scholar
12.Hambraeus, A. Aerobiology in the operating room: a review. J Hosp Infect 1988;11(Suppl A):6876.Google Scholar
13.Lidwell, OM, Lowbury, EJ, Whyte, W, Blowers, R, Stanley, SJ, Lowe, D. Effect of ultraclean air in operating rooms on deep sepsis in the joint after total hip or knee replacement: a randomised study. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1982;285:1014.Google Scholar
14.Tammelin, A, Hambraeus, A, Ståhle, E. Routes and sources of Staphylococcus aureus transmitted to the surgical wound during cardiothoracic surgery: possibility of preventing wound contamination by use of special scrub suits. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2001;22:338346.Google Scholar
15.Tammelin, A, Hambraeus, A, Ståhle, E. Source and route of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis transmitted to the surgical wound during cardio-thoracic surgery. Possibility of preventing wound contamination by use of special scrub suits. J Hosp Infect 2001;47:266276.Google Scholar
16.Société Francaise d’Hygiène Hospitalière. Gestion préopératoire du risque infectieux. 2013. http://nosobase.chu-lyon.fr/recommandations/sfhh/2013_gestion_preoperatoire_SF2H.pdf. Accessed May 12, 2014.Google Scholar
17.National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Surgical site infection: prevention and treatment of surgical site infection. 2008. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg74. Accessed May 12, 2014.Google Scholar
18.Société Francaise d’Hygiène Hospitalière. La qualité de l’air au bloc opératoire. 2004. http://www.sf2h.net/publications-SF2H/SF2H_recommandations-gr-air-2004.pdf. Accessed May 12, 2014.Google Scholar
19.Liberati, A, Altman, DG, Tetzlaff, J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLOS Med 2009;6:e1000100.Google Scholar
20.Edwards, R, Charani, E, Sevdalis, N, et al. Optimisation of infection prevention and control in acute health care by use of behaviour change: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis 2012;12:318329.Google Scholar
21.Pryor, F, Messmer, PR. The effect of traffic patterns in the OR on surgical site infections. AORN J 1998;68:649660.Google Scholar
22.Andersson, AE, Bergh, I, Karlsson, J, Eriksson, BI, Nilsson, K. Traffic flow in the operating room: an explorative and descriptive study on air quality during orthopedic trauma implant surgery. Am J Infect Control 2012;40:750755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Parikh, SN, Grice, SS, Schnell, BM, Salisbury, SR. Operating room traffic: is there any role of monitoring it? J Pediatr Orthop 2010;30:617623.Google Scholar
24.Babkin, Y, Raveh, D, Lifschitz, M, et al. Incidence and risk factors for surgical infection after total knee replacement. Scand J Infect Dis 2007;39:890895.Google Scholar
25.Castella, A, Charrier, L, Di Legami, V, et al.; Piemonte Nosocomial Infection Study Group. Surgical site infection surveillance: analysis of adherence to recommendations for routine infection control practices. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;27:835840.Google Scholar
26.Scaltriti, S, Cencetti, S, Rovesti, S, Marchesi, I, Bargellini, A, Borella, P. Risk factors for particulate and microbial contamination of air in operating theatres. J Hosp Infect 2007;66:320326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27.Durando, P, Bassetti, M, Orengo, G, et al.; Surgical Audit Team of the San Martino University Hospital of Genoa. Adherence to international and national recommendations for the prevention of surgical site infections in Italy: results from an observational prospective study in elective surgery. Am J Infect Control 2012;40:969972.Google Scholar
28.Wan, G-H, Chung, F-F, Tang, C-S. Long-term surveillance of air quality in medical center operating rooms. Am J Infect Control 2011;39:302308.Google Scholar
29.Panahi, P, Stroh, M, Casper, DS, Parvizi, J, Austin, MS. Operating room traffic is a major concern during total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2012;470:26902694.Google Scholar
30.Tjade, OH, Gabor, I. Evaluation of airborne operating room bacteria with a Biap slit sampler. J Hyg (Lond) 1980;84:3740.Google Scholar
31.Rackham, M, Sutherland, LM, Mintz, A, Cain, CMJ, Cundy, PJ. Theatre traffic: is your theatre a tearoom? Abstract. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010;92–B(Supp 1):205.Google Scholar
32.Accadbled, F, Louis, D, Rackham, M, Cundy, P, Sales de, Gauzy J. Opening the doors to the operative theatre. Abstract. Orthopaedic Proceedings 2011;93–B:518.Google Scholar
33.Young, RS, O’Regan, DJ. Cardiac surgical theatre traffic: time for traffic calming measures? Interact. Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2010;10:526529.Google Scholar
34.Lynch, RJ, Englesbe, MJ, Sturm, L, et al. Measurement of foot traffic in the operating room: implications for infection control. Am J Med Qual 2009;24:4552.Google Scholar
35.Crolla, RM, van der Laan, L, Veen, EJ, Hendriks, Y, van Schendel, C, Kluytmans, J. Reduction of surgical site infections after implementation of a bundle of care. PLOS ONE 2012;7:e44599.Google Scholar
36.Healey, AN, Sevdalis, N, Vincent, CA. Measuring intra-operative interference from distraction and interruption observed in the operating theatre. Ergonomics 2006;49:589604.Google Scholar
37.Healey, AN, Primus, CP, Koutantji, M. Quantifying distraction and interruption in urological surgery. Qual Saf Health Care 2007;16:135139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38.Beldi, G, Bisch-Knaden, S, Banz, V, Mühlemann, K, Candinas, D. Impact of intraoperative behavior on surgical site infections. Am J Surg 2009;198:157162.Google Scholar
39.Kurmann, A, Peter, M, Tschan, F, Mühlemann, K, Candinas, D, Beldi, G. Adverse effect of noise in the operating theatre on surgical-site infection. Br J Surg 2011;98:10211025.Google Scholar
40.Yinnon, AM, Wiener-Well, Y, Jerassy, Z, et al. Improving implementation of infection control guidelines to reduce nosocomial infection rates: pioneering the report card. J Hosp Infect 2012;81:169176.Google Scholar
41.Van der Slegt, J, van der Laan, L, Veen, EJ, Hendriks, Y, Romme, J, Kluytmans, J. Implementation of a bundle of care to reduce surgical site infections in patients undergoing vascular surgery. PLOS ONE 2013;8:e71566.Google Scholar
42.Tartari, E, Mamo, J. Pre-educational intervention survey of healthcare practitioners’ compliance with infection prevention measures in cardiothoracic surgery: low compliance but internationally comparable surgical site infection rate. J Hosp Infect 2011;77:348351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43.Borer, A, Gilad, J, Meydan, N, et al. Impact of active monitoring of infection control practices on deep sternal infection after open-heart surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;72:515520.Google Scholar
44.Mills, SJ, Holland, DJ, Hardy, AE. Operative field contamination by the sweating surgeon. Aust N Z J Surg 2000;70:837839.Google Scholar
45.Ritter, MA. Operating room environment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999;369:103109.Google Scholar
46.Brohus, H, Balling, KD, Jeppesen, D. Influence of movements on contaminant transport in an operating room. Indoor Air 2006;16:356372.Google Scholar
47.Woodhead, K, Taylor, EW, Bannister, G, Chesworth, T, Hoffman, P, Humphreys, H. Behaviours and rituals in the operating theatre: a report from the Hospital Infection Society Working Party on Infection Control in Operating Theatres. J Hosp Infect 2002;51:241255.Google Scholar
48.Tang, JW, Eames, I, Li, Y, et al. Door-opening motion can potentially lead to a transient breakdown in negative-pressure isolation conditions: the importance of vorticity and buoyancy airflows. J Hosp Infect 2005;61:283286.Google Scholar
49.Moro, ML. Health care-associated infections. Surg Infect 2006;7(Suppl 2):S21S23.Google Scholar
50.Coello, R, Charlett, A, Wilson, J, Ward, V, Pearson, A, Borriello, P. Adverse impact of surgical site infections in English hospitals. J Hosp Infect 2005;60:93103.Google Scholar
51.Gastmeier, P, Breier, A-C, Brandt, C. Influence of laminar airflow on prosthetic joint infections: a systematic review. J Hosp Infect 2012;81:7378.Google Scholar
52.Birgand, G, Azevedo, C, Toupet, G, et al. Attitudes, risk of infection and behaviours in the operating room (the ARIBO Project): a prospective, cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2014;4:e004274.Google Scholar