Article contents
Teams Are Changing: Time to “Think Networks”
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 January 2015
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS1754942600004739/resource/name/firstPage-S1754942600004739a.jpg)
- Type
- Commentaries
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2012
Footnotes
The authors wish to acknowledge the following funding sources that contributed to the development of materials presented in this chapter: National Science Foundation Grants: BCS- 0940851 and IIS-0838564.
References
Borgatti, S. P., & Everett, M. G. (1999). Models of core/periphery structures.
Social Network, 12, 374–395.
Google Scholar
Borgatti, S. P., & Foster, P. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology.
Journal of Management, 29, 991–1013.
Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. (1992).
Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis. A typology of composition models.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 234–246.
Google Scholar
Contractor, N. S., Wasserman, S., & Faust, N. (2006). Testing multitheoretical, multilevel hypotheses about organizational networks: An analytic framework and empirical example.
Academy of Management Journal, 31, 681–703.
Google Scholar
Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification.
Social Networks, 1, 215–239.
Google Scholar
Guimera, R., Uzzi, R., Spiro, J., & Amaral, L. A. N. (2005). Team assembly mechanisms determine collaboration network structure and team performance.
Science, 308, 697–702.
Google Scholar
Hummon, N. P., & Doreian, P. (2003). Some dynamics of social balance processes: Bringing Heider back into balance theory.
Social Networks, 25, 17–49.
Google Scholar
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In Klein, K. J. & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3–90). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
Mizruchi, M. S., & Potts, B. B. (1998). Centrality and power revisited: Actor success in group decision making.
Social Networks, 20, 353–387.
Google Scholar
Monge, P. R., & Contractor, N. S. (2003). Theories of communication networks. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Poole, M. S., & Contractor, N. S. (2011). Conceptualizing the multiteam system as a system of networked groups. In Zaccaro, S. J., Marks, M. A., & DeChurch, L. A. (Eds.), Multiteam systems: An organizational form for dynamic and complex environments (pp. 193–224). New York, NY: Routledge Academic.
Google Scholar
Reagans, R., & Zuckerman, E. W. (2001). Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams.
Organization Science, 12, 502–517.
Google Scholar
Roberts, K. H., Hulin, C. L., & Rousseau, D. M. (1978).
Developing an interdisciplinary science of organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
Robins, G., Pattison, P., Kalish, Y., & Lusher, D. (2007). An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks.
Social Networks, 29, 173–191.
Google Scholar
Snijders, T. A. B., Steglich, C. E. G., Schweinberger, M., & Huisman, M. (2007). Manual for SIENA, version 3.2. Groningen, The Netherlands: University of Groningen.
Google Scholar
Sparrowe, R. T.
Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Kraimer, M. L. (2001). Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups.
Academy of Management Journal, 44, 316–325.
Google Scholar
Tannenbaum, S. I., Mathieu, J. E., Salas, E., & Cohen, D. (2012). Teams are changing: Are research and practice evolving fast enough?
Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 2–24.
Google Scholar
- 16
- Cited by