Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-05T06:26:39.447Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stubborn Reliance on Human Nature in Employee Selection: Statistical Decision Aids Are Evolutionarily Novel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Stephen M. Colarelli  and
Matthew Thompson
Stephen M. Colarelli*
Affiliation:
Central Michigan University
Matthew Thompson
Affiliation:
Central Michigan University
*
E-mail: colar1sm@cmich.edu, Address: Department of Psychology, Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant, MI 48859
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , September 2008 , pp. 347 - 351
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2008 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Thanks to Geeta D’Souza and Kate Unterborn for comments on an earlier version of this article

References

Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1993). Half a minute: Predicting teacher evaluations from thin slices of nonverbal behavior and physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 64, 431–441.10.1037/0022-3514.64.3.431Google Scholar
Brown, S. H. (1979). Validity distortions associated with a test in use. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 460–462.10.1037/0021-9010.64.4.460Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (2008). Evolutionary psychology (3rd. ed.). Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
Casscells, W., Schoenberger, A., & Graboys, T. B. (1978). Interpretation by physicians of clinical laboratory results. New England Journal of Medicine, 299, 999–1001.10.1056/NEJM197811022991808Google Scholar
Colarelli, S. M. (1996). Establishment and job context influences on the use of hiring practices. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 45, 153–176.10.1111/j.1464-0597.1996.tb00762.xGoogle Scholar
Colarelli, S. M. (2003). No best way: An evolutionary perspective on human resource management. Greenwich, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1996). Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all?: Rethinking some conclusions of the literature on judgment under uncertainty. Cognition, 58, 1–73.10.1016/0010-0277(95)00664-8Google Scholar
Dawes, R. M. (1971). A case study of graduate admissions: Applications of three principles of human decision making. American Psychologist, 26, 180–188.10.1037/h0030868Google Scholar
Dunbar, R. (1996). Grooming, gossip, and the evolution of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ekman, P. (1993). Facial expression and emotion. American Psychologist, 48, 384–392.10.1037/0003-066X.48.4.384Google Scholar
Funder, D. C. (1999). Personality Judgment: A realistic approach to person perception. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hastie, R., & Dawes, R. M. (2001). Rational choice in an uncertain world. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Highhouse, S. (2008). Stubborn reliance on intuition and subjectivity in employee selection. Industrial and Organizational Psychology; Perspectives on Science Practice, 1, 333–342.Google Scholar
Kenrick, D. T., Neuberg, S., & Cialdini, R. (2006). Social psychology (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Latham, G. P., & Whyte, G. (1994). The futility of utility analysis. Personnel Psychology, 47, 31–46.10.1111/j.1744-6570.1994.tb02408.xGoogle Scholar
Lawshe, C. H., & Bolda, R. A. (1958). Expectancy charts. I. Their use and empirical development. Personnel Psychology, 11, 353–365.10.1111/j.1744-6570.1958.tb00023.xGoogle Scholar
Lievens, F., Highhouse, S., & DeCorte, W. (2005). The importance of traits and abilities in supervisors’ hirability decisions as a function of method of assessment. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 453–470.10.1348/096317905X26093Google Scholar
Megarry, T. (1995). Society in prehistory: The origins of human culture. New York: New York University Press.10.1007/978-1-349-24248-1Google Scholar
Moore, R. F. (1996). Caring for identified versus statistical lives: An evolutionary view of medical distributive justice. Ethology and Sociobiology, 17, 379–401.10.1016/S0162-3095(96)00079-9Google Scholar
Real, L. A. (1991). Animal choice behavior and the evolution of cognitive architecture. Science, 253, 980–986.10.1126/science.1887231Google Scholar
Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., McKenzie, R. C., & Muldrow, T. W. (1979). Impact of valid selection procedures on work-force productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 609–626.10.1037/0021-9010.64.6.609Google Scholar
Sugiyama, M. S. (2001). Food, foragers, and folklore: The role of narrative in human subsistence. Evolution & Human Behavior, 22, 221–240.10.1016/S1090-5138(01)00063-0Google Scholar
Tett, R., & Christiansen, N. D. (2008). Personality assessment in organizations. In Boyle, G., Matthews, G., & Saklofske, D. (Eds.), Personality measurement and assessment. pp. 720–742. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Topor, D., Colarelli, S. M., & Han, K. (2006). The influence of personnel selection constructs and methods on evaluations of job applicants. Journal of Business and Psychology, 21, 361–376.10.1007/s10869-006-9033-6Google Scholar
Wigdor, A. K. & Garner, W. R. (Eds.). (1982). Ability testing: Uses consequences, and controversies (Parts 1 & 2). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Williams, G. C. (1966). Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
York, K. M., & Cranny, C. J. (1989). Job hunting and applicant recruiting: Expectations in the interview process and suggestions for improvement. Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 26, 19–23.Google Scholar