Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Seeing the Forest but Missing the Trees: The Role of Judgments in Performance Management

  • John P. Meriac (a1), C. Allen Gorman (a2) and Therese Macan (a1)

Extract

Various solutions have been proposed to “fix” performance management (PM) over the last several decades. Pulakos, Mueller Hanson, Arad, and Moye (2015) have presented a holistic approach to improving PM in organizations. Although this approach addresses several key elements related to the social context of PM, namely the buy-in of organizational stakeholders, timely and regular feedback, and future-directed feedback, we believe that several robust findings from the PM research literature could further improve this process. Are Pulakos et al. looking at the forest but missing the trees? In the following commentary, we offer several reasons that performance judgments and perhaps even informal ratings are still operating and occurring in the proposed holistic system. Therefore, advancements in other areas of PM research may offer additional ways to fix PM.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to John P. Meriac, Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri—St. Louis, 425 Stadler Hall, One University Boulevard, St. Louis, MO 63121-4499. E-mail: meriacj@umsl.edu

References

Hide All
Athey, T. R., & McIntyre, R. M. (1987). Effect of rater training on rater accuracy: Level of processing theory and social facilitation theory perspectives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 567572. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.72.4.567
Bernardin, H. J., & Buckley, M. R. (1981). Strategies in rater training. Academy of Management Review, 6, 205212. doi:10.5465/AMR.1981.4287782
Borman, W. C., Buck, D. E., Hanson, M. A., Motowidlo, S. J., Stark, S., & Drasgow, F. (2001). An examination of the comparative reliability, validity, and accuracy of performance ratings made using computerized adaptive rating scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 965973. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.965
Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Tannenbaum, S. L., Salas, E., & Converse, S. A. (1991). Toward an integration of training theory and technique. Human Factors, 33, 281292.
Fisicaro, S. A. (1988). A reexamination of the relation between halo error and accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 239244. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.73.2.239
Goffin, R. D., Jelley, R. B., Powell, D. M., & Johnston, N. G. (2009). Taking advantage of social comparisons in performance appraisal: The relative percentile method. Human Resource Management, 48, 251268.
Gorman, C. A., & Rentsch, J. R. (2009). Evaluating frame-of-reference rater training effectiveness using performance schema accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 13361344. doi:10.1037/a0016476
Hoffman, B. J., Gorman, C. A., Blair, C. A., Meriac, J. P., Overstreet, B., & Atchley, E. K. (2012). Evidence for the effectiveness of an alternative multisource performance rating methodology. Personnel Psychology, 65, 531563. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2012.01252.x
Ilgen, D. R., Barnes-Farrell, J. L., & McKellin, D. B. (1993). Performance appraisal process research in the 1980s: What has it contributed to appraisals in use? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54, 321368. doi:10.1006/obhd.1993.1015
Kane, J. S., & Woehr, D. J. (2006). Performance measurement reconsidered: An examination of frequency estimation as a basis for assessment. In Bennett, W. Jr., Lance, C. E., & Woehr, D. J. (Eds.), Performance measurement: Current perspectives and future challenges (pp. 77110). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Landy, F. J., & Farr, J. L. (1980). Performance rating. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 72107.
Levy, P. E., & Williams, J. R. (2004). The social context of performance appraisal: A review and framework for the future. Journal of Management, 30, 881905. doi:10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.005
Lievens, F. (2001). Assessor training strategies and their effects on accuracy, interrater reliability, and discriminant validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 255264. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.2.255
Macan, T., Mehner, K., Havill, L., Roberts, L., Heft, L., & Meriac, J. P. (2011). Two for the price of one: Assessment center training to focus on behaviors can transfer to performance appraisals. Human Performance, 24, 443457. doi:10.1080/08959285.2011.614664
Murphy, K. R. (2008). Explaining the weak relationship between job performance and ratings of job performance. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Research and Practice, 1, 148160. doi:10.1111/j.1754-9434.2008.00030.x
Murphy, K. R., & Balzer, W. K. (1989). Rater errors and rating accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 619624.
Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. N. (1995). Understanding performance appraisal: Social, organizational, and goal-based perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Nathan, B. R., & Tippins, N. (1990). The consequences of halo “error” in performance ratings: A field study of the moderating effect of halo on test validation results. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 290296. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.75.3.290
Noonan, L. E., & Sulsky, L. M. (2001). Impact of frame-of-reference and behavioral observation training on alternative training effectiveness criteria in a Canadian military sample. Human Performance, 14, 326. doi:10.1207/S15327043HUP1401_02
Pulakos, E. D., Mueller Hanson, R., Arad, S., & Moye, N. (2015). Performance management can be fixed: An on-the-job experiential learning approach for complex behavior change. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 8, 5176.
Pulakos, E. D., & O’Leary, R. S. (2011). Why is performance management broken? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 146164. doi:10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01315.x
Roch, S. G., Woehr, D. J., Mishra, V., & Kieszczynska, U. (2012). Rater training revisited: An updated meta-analytic review of frame-of-reference training. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85, 370395. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.2011.02045.x
Schleicher, D. J., & Day, D. V. (1998). A cognitive evaluation of frame-of-reference rater training: Content and process issues. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73, 76101. doi:10.1006/obhd.1998.2751
ThorntonG. C., III G. C., III, & Rupp, D. E. (2006). Assessment centers in human resource management. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Woehr, D. J., & Huffcutt, A. I. (1994). Rater training for performance appraisal: A quantitative review. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67, 189205. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1994.tb00562.x

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Seeing the Forest but Missing the Trees: The Role of Judgments in Performance Management

  • John P. Meriac (a1), C. Allen Gorman (a2) and Therese Macan (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.