Skip to main content Accessibility help

Of Babies and Bathwater: Don't Throw the Measure Out With the Application

  • David J. Woehr (a1) and Sylvia G. Roch (a2)


Adler et al. (2016) provide a discussion of the pros and cons surrounding the issue of “Getting Rid of Performance Ratings.” Yet neither the pro nor the con side of the debate appears to fully consider the central role of performance ratings outside the realm of performance management.


Corresponding author

Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to David J. Woehr, Department of Management, University of North Carolina Charlotte, 9201 University City Boulevard, Charlotte, NC 28223-0001. E-mail:


Hide All
Adler, S., Campion, M., Colquitt, A., Grubb, A., Murphy, K., Ollander-Krane, R., & Pulakos, E. D. (2016). Getting rid of performance ratings: Genius or folly? A debate. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 9 (2), 219252.
Arthur, W., Day, E. A., McNelly, T. L., & Edens, P. S. (2003). A meta-analysis of the criterion-related validity of assessment center dimensions. Personnel Psychology, 56, 125154.
Arthur, W., & Villado, A. J. (2008). The importance of distinguishing between constructs and methods when comparing predictors in personnel selection research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 435442.
Austin, J. T., & Villanova, P. (1992). The criterion problem: 1917–1992. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 836874.
Bertua, C., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. F. (2005). The predictive validity of cognitive ability tests: A UK meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 387409.
Blum, M., & Naylor, J. (1968). Industrial psychology. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Gaugler, B. B., Rosenthal, D. B., Thornton, G. C., & Bentson, C. (1987). Meta-analysis of assessment center validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 493511.
Goldstein, I. L., & Ford, K. J. (2002). Training in organizations: Needs assessment, development, and evaluation (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Huffcutt, A. I., & Arthur, W. (1994). Hunter and Hunter (1984) revisited: Interview validity for entry-level jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 184190.
Hunter, J. E. (1983). Test validation for 12,000 jobs: An application of job classification and validity generalization analysis to the general aptitude test battery. Washington, DC: Department of Labor, Employment Services.
Hunter, J. E., & Hunter, R. F. (1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 7295.
Jawahar, I. M., & Williams, C. R. (1997). Where all the children are above average: The performance appraisal purpose effect. Personnel Psychology, 50, 905925.
Kraiger, K. (2002). Decision-based evaluation. In Kraiger, K. (Ed.), Creating, implementing, and managing effective training and development: State of the art lessons for practice (pp. 331375). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
McDaniel, M. A., Morgeson, F. P., Finnegan, E. B., Campion, M. A., & Braverman, E. P. (2001). Use of situational judgment tests to predict job performance: A clarification of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 730740.
McDaniel, M. A., Whetzel, D. L., Schmidt, F. L., & Maurer, S. D. (1994). The validity of employment interviews—A comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 599616.
McKay, P. F., & McDaniel, M. A. (2006). A reexamination of Black–White mean differences in work performance: More data, more moderators. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 538554.
Rothstein, H. R., Schmidt, F. L., Erwin, F. W., Owens, W. A., & Sparks, C. P. (1990). Biographical data in employment selection: Can validities be made generalizable. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 175184.
Salgado, J. F., Anderson, N., Moscoso, S., Bertua, C., & De Fruyt, F. (2003). International validity generalization of GMA and cognitive ability: A European community meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 56, 537605.
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262274.
Schmidt, F. L., & Rader, M. (1999). Exploring the boundary conditions for interview validity: Meta-analytic validity findings for a new interview type. Personnel Psychology, 52, 445464.
Schmitt, N., Gooding, R. Z., Noe, R. A., & Kirsch, M. (1984). Meta-analyses of validity studies published between 1964 and 1982 and the investigation of study characteristics. Personnel Psychology, 37, 407422.
Taylor, P. J., Russ-Eft, D., & Taylor, H. (2009). Transfer of management training from alternative perspectives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 104112.
Thorndike, R. L. (1949). Personnel selection: Test and measurement techniques. New York, NY: Wiley.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Of Babies and Bathwater: Don't Throw the Measure Out With the Application

  • David J. Woehr (a1) and Sylvia G. Roch (a2)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.