Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Mend It, Don’t End It: An Alternate View of Assessment Center Construct-Related Validity Evidence

  • Winfred Arthur (a1), Eric Anthony Day (a2) and David J. Woehr (a3)

Abstract

  • An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided below. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Copyright

Corresponding author

E-mail: wea@psyc.tamu.edu, Address: Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, 4235 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-4235

References

Hide All
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NY: Prentice-Hall.
Arthur, W. Jr., Day, E. A., McNelly, T. L., & Edens, P. S. (2003). Meta-analysis of the criterion-related validity of assessment center dimensions. Personnel Psychology, 56, 125154.
Arthur, W. Jr., & Villado, A. J. (in press). The importance of distinguishing between constructs and methods when comparing predictors in personnel selection research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology.
Arthur, W. Jr., Woehr, D. J., & Maldegen, R. (2000). Convergent and discriminant validity of assessment center dimensions: An empirical re-examination of the assessment center construct-related validity paradox. Journal of Management, 26, 813835.
Binning, J. F., & Barrett, G. V. (1989). Validity of personnel decisions: A conceptual analysis of the inferential and evidential bases. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 478494.
Bowler, M. C., & Woehr, D. J. (2006). A meta-analytic evaluation of the impact of dimension and exercise factors on assessment center ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 11141124.
Gasser, M., Butler, A., Waddilove, L., & Tan, R. (2004). Defining the profession of industrial-organizational psychology. Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 42(2), 1520.
Highhouse, S., & Zickar, M. J. (1997). Where has all the psychology gone? Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 35(2), 8288.
Howard, A. (1997). A reassessment of assessment centers: Challenges for the 21st century. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 1352.
Lance, C. E. (2008). Why assessment centers do not work the way they are supposed to. Industrial Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1, 8497.
Lance, C. E., Woehr, D. J., & Meade, A. W. (2007). Case study: A Monte Carlo investigation of assessment center construct validity models. Organizational Research Methods, 10, 430448.
Landy, F. J. (1986). Stamp collecting versus science: Validation as hypothesis testing. American Psychologist, 41, 11831192.
Lievens, F. (1998). Factors which improve the construct validity of assessment centers: A review. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 6, 141152.
Meriac, J. P., Hoffman, B. J., Fleisher, M., & Woehr, D. J. (2007, April). Expanding the nomological net surrounding assessment center dimensions: A meta-analysis. Paper presented at the 22nd Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial-Organizational Psychology, New York.
Messick, S. J. (1995). The validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741749.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Robie, C., Adams, K. A., Osburn, H. G., Morris, M. A., & Etchegaray, J. M. (2000). Effects of the rating process on the construct validity of assessment center dimension evaluations. Human Performance, 13, 355370.
Ryan, A. M. (2003). Defining ourselves: I-O psychology’s identity quest. Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 41(1), 2133.
Sackett, P. R., & Dreher, G. F. (1982). Constructs and assessment center dimensions: Some troubling empirical findings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 401410.
Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Inc. (2003). Principles for the validation and use of personnel selection procedures (4th ed.). Bowling Green, OH: SIOP.
Woehr, D. J., & Arthur, W. Jr. (2003). The construct-related validity of assessment center ratings: A review and meta-analysis of the role of methodological factors. Journal of Management, 29, 231258.
Zedeck, S. (1986). A process analysis of the assessment center method. In Staw, B. & Cummings, L. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 8, pp. 259296). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Mend It, Don’t End It: An Alternate View of Assessment Center Construct-Related Validity Evidence

  • Winfred Arthur (a1), Eric Anthony Day (a2) and David J. Woehr (a3)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.