Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Long Live Social Exchange Theory

  • Caitlin M. Porter (a1)

Extract

Chernyak-Hai and Rabenu (2018) argue that social exchange theory (SET) should be revised to accommodate work relationships in the “new era” of work, characterized by a more diverse workforce with changing expectations for relationships between themselves and their organizational representatives. To account for the modern workplace, Chernyak-Hai and Rabenu introduce “new” or “modern exchange variables” that capture modern workplace conditions and employee characteristics or preferences, which they expect to indirectly influence whether and how employees develop high-quality work relationships with organizational representatives.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Caitlin M. Porter, Department of Psychology, University of Houston, 3695 Cullen Blvd., Room 126, Houston, TX 77204. E-mail: cporter2@central.uh.edu

References

Hide All
Bauer, T. N., & Green, S. G. (1996). Development of leader-member exchange: A longitudinal test. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 15381567. doi: 10.2307/257068
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York, NY: John Wiley.
Chatman, J. A. (1989). Improving interactional organizational research: A model of person-organization fit. Academy of Management Review, 14, 333349.
Chernyak-Hai, L., & Rabenu, E. (2018). The new era workplace relationships: Is social exchange theory still relevant? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 11 (3), 456481.
Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31, 874900. doi: 10.1177/0149206305279602
Eisenberger, R., Armeli, S., Rexwinkel, B., Lynch, P. D., & Rhoades, L. (2001). Reciprocation of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 4251. doi: 10.37/0021-9010.86.1.42
Ferris, G. R., Liden, R. C., Munyon, T. P., Summers, J. K., Basik, K. J., & Buckley, M. R. (2009). Relationships at work: Toward a multidimensional conceptualization of dyadic work relationships. Journal of Management, 35, 13791403. doi: 10.1177/0149206309344741
Foa, U. G. (1971). Interpersonal and economic resources. Science, 171, 345351. doi: 10.1126/science.171.3969.345
Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161178. doi: 10.2307/2092623
Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219247. doi: 10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
Molm, L. D. (2003). Theoretical comparisons of forms of exchange. Sociological Theory, 21, 117. doi: 10.1111/1467-9558.00171
Rousseau, D. M., Ho, V. T., & Greenberg, J. (2006). I-deals: Idiosyncratic terms in employment relationships. Academy of Management Review, 31, 977994. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2006.22527470
Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437453. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1987.tb00609.x
Shore, L. M., Tetrick, L. E., Taylor, M. S., Coyle Shapiro, J. A.-M., Liden, R. C., McLean Parks, J., . . . Van Dyne, L. (2004). The employee-organization relationship: A timely concept in a period of transition. In Buckley, M. R., Halbesleben, J. R. B., & Wheeler, A. R. (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management (pp. 291370). Bingley, UK: Emerald. doi: 10.1016/S0742-7301(04)23007-9
Tsui, A. S., Pearce, J. L., Porter, L. W., & Tripoli, A. M. (1997). Alternative approaches to the employee-organization relationship: Does investment in employees pay off? Academy of Management Journal, 40, 10891121. doi: 10.2307/256928
Uhl-Bien, M., & Maslyn, J. M. (2003). Reciprocity in manager–subordinate relationships: Components, configurations, and outcomes. Journal of Management, 29, 511532. doi: 10.1016/S0149-2063_03_00023-0
Wilson, K. S., Sin, H.-P., & Conlon, D. E. (2010). What about the leader in leader–member exchange? The impact of resource exchanges and substitutability on the leader. Academy of Management Review, 35, 358372. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2010.51141654

Long Live Social Exchange Theory

  • Caitlin M. Porter (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed