Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

How Industrial-Organizational Psychology Can Benefit From Scientometrics (and Vice Versa)

  • Cornelius J. König (a1), Nida ul Habib Bajwa (a1), Gabriel Schui (a2) and Clemens B. Fell (a3)

Extract

Scientific fields benefit when their researchers engage in self-reflection. Accordingly, we welcome the evidence gathered by Gardner, Ryan, and Snoeyink (2018) on gender differences in our field, the field of industrial and organizational (I-O) psychology. In this commentary, we argue that such self-reflection processes can be further enhanced by taking advantage of the wealth and breadth of scientometrics, the quantitative study of science.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Cornelius König, Fachrichtung Psychologie, Universität des Saarlandes, Campus A 1 3, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany. E-mail: ckoenig@mx.uni-saarland.de

References

Hide All
Abramo, G., D'Angelo, C. A., & Di Costa, F. (2018). The effects of gender, age and academic rank on research diversification. Scientometrics, 114, 373387. doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2529-1
Bornmann, L., Ye, A. Y., & Ye, F. Y. (2018). Identifying “hot papers” and papers with “delayed recognition” in large-scale datasets by using dynamically normalized citation impact scores. Scientometrics, 116, 655672. doi: 10.1007/s11192-018-2772-0
Chen, C. (2017). Science mapping: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2 (2), 140. doi: 10.1515/jdis-2017-0006
Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 429456. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.429
Fell, C. B., & König, C. J. (2016). Is there a gender difference in scientific collaboration? A scientometric examination of co-authorships among industrial–organizational psychologists. Scientometrics, 108, 113141. doi: 10.1007/s11192-016-1967-5
Gardner, D. M., Ryan, A. M., & Snoeyink, M. (2018). How are we doing? An examination of gender representation in I-O psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 11 (3), 369–388.
Gipp, B., & Beel, J. (2009). Citation proximity analysis (CPA): A new approach for identifying related work based on co-citation analysis. In Larsen, B. & Leta, J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics (pp. 571575). Leuven, Belgium: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics.
König, C. J., & Bajwa, N. u. H. (2018). How international is research in industrial/organizational psychology? A large empirical investigation. Paper submitted for publication.
König, C. J., Fell, C. B., Kellnhofer, L., & Schui, G. (2015). Are there gender differences among researchers from industrial/organizational psychology? Scientometrics, 105, 19311952. doi: 10.1007/s11192-015-1646-y
Krampen, G. (2016). Scientometric trend analyses of publications on the history of psychology: Is psychology becoming an unhistorical science? Scientometrics, 106, 12171238. doi: 10.1007/s11192-016-1834-4
Larivière, V., Ni, C., Gingras, Y., Cronin, B., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2013). Global gender disparities in science. Nature, 504, 211213. doi: 10.1038/504211a
Ni, P., & An, X. (2018). Relationship between international collaboration papers and their citations from an economic perspective. Scientometrics, 116, 863877. doi: 10.1007/s11192-018-2784-9
Ortega, J. L. (2017). Are peer-review activities related to reviewer bibliometric performance? A scientometric analysis of Publons. Scientometrics, 112, 947962. doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2399-6
Poon, W. C., & Leeves, G. D. (2017). Is there gender gap unequivocally? Evidence from research output 1958–2008. Scientometrics, 111, 16871701. doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2327-9
Qiu, J., Zhao, R., Yang, S., & Dong, K. (2017). Informetrics: Theory, methods and applications. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
Roberson, Q., Ryan, A. M., & Ragins, B. R. (2017). The evolution and future of diversity at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102, 483499. doi: 10.1037/apl0000161
Sandnes, F. E. (2018). Do Norwegian academics who publish more earn higher salaries? Scientometrics, 115, 263281. doi: 10.1007/s11192-018-2639-4
Sullivan, S. E., & Baruch, Y. (2009). Advances in career theory and research: A critical review and agenda for future exploration. Journal of Management, 35, 15421571. doi: 10.1177/0149206309350082
Thelwall, M. (2016). Web indicators for research evaluation: A practical guide. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool.

How Industrial-Organizational Psychology Can Benefit From Scientometrics (and Vice Versa)

  • Cornelius J. König (a1), Nida ul Habib Bajwa (a1), Gabriel Schui (a2) and Clemens B. Fell (a3)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed