Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T08:50:10.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Decolonizing intervention assessment: Qualitative and interdisciplinary approaches to understanding “side effects”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2022

Julia L. O. Beckel Open the ORCID record for Julia L. O. Beckel [Opens in a new window] ,
Danielle M. Gardner  and
Joshua J. Prasad
Julia L. O. Beckel*
Affiliation:
Colorado State University
Danielle M. Gardner
Affiliation:
Colorado State University
Joshua J. Prasad
Affiliation:
Colorado State University
*
*Corresponding author. Email: Julia.buck@colostate.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , March 2022 , pp. 113 - 116
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Braun, K. L., Browne, C. V., Ka ‘opua, L. S., Kim, B. J., & Mokuau, N. (2014). Research on indigenous elders: From positivistic to decolonizing methodologies. Gerontologist, 54(1), 117–126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Briner, R. B., & Rousseau, D. M. (2011) Evidence-based I-O psychology: Not there yet. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4(1), 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, Z. S. (2019). Organizational psychology and behavior: An integrated approach to understanding the workplace. Kendall Hunt.Google Scholar
Landers, R. N., Armstrong, M. B., Helms, M. B., & Epps, A. N. (2017). The interdisciplinarity of I-O psychology PhD programs and faculty. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 55(2).Google Scholar
Porter, A. L., Roessner, J. D., Cohen, A. S., & Perreault, M. (2006). Interdisciplinary research: Meaning, metrics and nurture. Research Evaluation, 15(3), 187–195.Google Scholar
Pratt, M. G., & Bonaccio, S. (2016). Qualitative research in I-O psychology: Maps, myths, and moving forward. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 9(4), 693–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, L. T. (2021). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. Zed Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spector, P. E., Rogelberg, S. G., Ryan, A. M., Schmitt, N., & Zedeck, S. (2014). Moving the pendulum back to the middle: Reflections on and introduction to the inductive research special issue of Journal of Business and Psychology. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(4), 499–502.Google Scholar
Watts, L. L., Gray, B. E., & Medeiros, K. E. (2021). Side effects associated with organizational interventions: A perspective. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 15(1), 76–94.Google Scholar