Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-wpx69 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-26T17:04:17.430Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Culture's Consequences for Leadership: The Role of Context in Affecting Leadership Perceptions and Performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

William S. Kramer  and
Marissa L. Shuffler
William S. Kramer*
Affiliation:
Clemson University
Marissa L. Shuffler
Affiliation:
Clemson University
*
E-mail: wskrame@g.clemson.edu, Address: Department of Psychology, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

As acknowledged by Lord and Dinh (2014) in their focal article, across a plethora of organizational literatures and topics of interest, there often seems to be a common theme: context matters. Although this is not a very surprising statement and may seem obvious, the surprising reality is that within a number of topics in our field, context is either superficially taken into consideration or not examined at all. This oversight has the potential to skew our understanding of important concepts. Indeed, Joshi and Roh (2009) revealed in their meta-analysis exploring team diversity that context served as a significant moderator of performance, illustrating the criticality of understanding how contextual factors may predict outcomes above and beyond individual inputs.

Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , June 2014 , pp. 199 - 203
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gelfand, M. J., Lun, J., Lyons, S., & Shteynberg, G. (2011). Descriptive norms as carriers of culture in negotiation. International Negotiation, 16, 361–381.Google Scholar
House, R. J., Hanges, P. V., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Joshi, A., & Roh, H. (2009). The role of context in work team diversity research: A meta-analytic review. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 599–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkman, B., & Mathieu, J. (2005). The dimensions and antecedents of team virtuality. Journal of Management, 31, 700–718.Google Scholar
Landau, M. J., Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., Cohen, F., Pyszczynski, T., Arndt, J., … Cook, A. (2004). Deliver us from evil: The effects of mortality salience and reminders of 9/11 on support for President George W. Bush. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1136–1150.Google Scholar
Lord, R. G., & Dinh, J. E. (2014). What have we learned that is critical in understanding leadership perceptions and leader-performance relations? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 7(2), 158–177.Google Scholar
Northouse, P. G. (2012). Leadership: Theory and practice. New York, NY: Sage.Google Scholar
Osland, J. S., & Bird, A. (2000). Beyond sophisticated stereotyping: Cultural sensemaking in context. Academy of Management Executive, 14, 65–79.Google Scholar
Rosette, A. S., Brett, J. M., Barsness, Z., & Lytle, A. L. (2006). When cultures clash electronically: The impact of email and social norms on negotiation behavior and outcomes. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43(4), 628–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar