Hostname: page-component-594f858ff7-r29tb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-06-07T22:14:20.896Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "corePageComponentUseShareaholicInsteadOfAddThis": true, "coreDisableSocialShare": false, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false

Exceeding Hegel and Lacan: Different Fields of Pleasure within Foucault and Irigaray

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Abstract

Anglo-American embodiments of poststructuralist and French feminism often align themselves with the texts of either Michel Foucault or Luce Irigaray. lnterrogating this alleged distance between Foucault and Irigaray, I show how it reinscrihes the phallic field of concepts and categories within feminist discourses. Framing both Foucault and Irigaray as exceeding]acques Lacan's metamorphosis of G.W.F. Hegel's Concept, I suggest that engaging their styles might yield richer tools for articulating the differences within our different lives.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Parveen. 1992. Waiving the phallus, differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 4(1): 7583.Google Scholar
Bartky, Sandra. 1990. Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bernheimer, Charles. 1992. Penile reference in phallic theory, differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 4(1): 116–32.Google Scholar
Bordo, Susan. 1993. Unbearable weight: Feminism, western culture, and the body. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Braidotti, Rosi. 1994. Nomadic subjects: Embodiment and sexual difference in contemporary feminist theory. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Burke, CarolynSchor, Naomi, and Whitford, Margaret eds.,. 1994. Engaging with Irigaray. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1993. Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex.” New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chanter, Tina. 1995. Ethics of eros: Irigaray's rewriting of the philosophers. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Diprose, Rosalyn. 1991. In excess: The body and the habit of sexual difference. Hypatia 6(3): 156–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flay, Joseph C. 1984. Hegel's quest for certainty. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 1970. The interpretation of dreams. Trans. Strachey, James. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1970. The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1972. The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. Trans. Smith, A.M. Sheridan. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1977. Language, counter‐memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews by Michel Foucault. Ed. Bouchard, Donald F.Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1978. The history of sexuality, Volume 1. Trans. Hurley, Robert. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1979. Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Trans. Sheridan, Alan. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1988. The care of the self: Volume 3 of the history of sexuality. Trans. Hurley, Robert. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1990. The use of pleasure: Volume 2 of the history of sexuality. Trans. Hurley, Robert. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Fuss, Diana. 1989. Essentially speaking: Feminism, nature & difference. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fuss, Diana. 1995 Identification papers. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 1989. Volatile bodies: Towards a corporeal feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 1990. Jacques Lacan: A feminist introduction. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1977. Basic writings from being and time (1927) to the task of thinking (1964). Ed. Krell, David Farrell. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Hegel, G.W.F. 1969. Science of logic. Trans. Miller, A.V.New Jersey: Humanities Press International.Google Scholar
Hegel, G.W.F. 1977. Phenomenology of spirit. Trans. Miller, A.V.Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hesiod, . 1953. Theogony. Trans. Brown, Norman O.New York: Liberal Arts Press.Google Scholar
Hirsh, Elizabeth and Olson, Gary A. 1995. “Je‐Luce Irigaray”: a meeting with Luce Irigaray. Hypatia 10 (2): 93114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1985a. Parler n'est jamais neutre. Paris: Les editions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1985b. Speculum of the other woman. Trans. Gill, Gillian C.Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1985c. This sex which is not one. Trans. Porter, Catherine. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1991. The Irigaray reader. Ed. Whitford, Margaret. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1993a. An ethics of sexual difference. Trans. Burke, Carolyn and Gill, Gillian C.Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1993b. Je, tu, nous: Toward a culture of difference. Trans. Martin, Alison. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1996. I love to you: Sketch of a possible felicity in history. Trans. Martin, Alison. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1929. The critique of pure reason. Trans. Smith, Norman Kemp. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Kress, R. Lee. 1996. Femininity, castration, and the phallus. Literature and Psychology 42(3): 114.Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques. 1977. Ecrits: A selection. Trans. Sheridan, Alan. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques. 1982. Feminine sexuality: Jacques Lacan and the école freudienne. Trans. Rose, Jacqueline, ed. Mitchell, Juliet and Rose, Jacqueline. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Lauer, Quentin. 1976. A reading of Hegel's phenomonelogy of spirit. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Mendel, Gregor. 1950. Experiments in plant hybridisation. Trans. Royal Horticultural Society of London. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1972. Beyond good and evil: Prelude to a philosophy of the future. Trans. Hollingdale, R.J.New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Plato, . 1961. Plato and the collected works. Ed. Edith, Hamilton, and Cairns, Huntington. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Russon, John. 1993. Reading and the body in Hegel. Clio 22(4): 321–37.Google Scholar
de. Saussure, Ferdinand. 1959. Course in general linguistics. Trans. Baskin, Wade. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
Silverman, Kaja. 1992. The Lacanian phallus, differences: A journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 4(1): 84114.Google Scholar
Sophocles, . 1960. Oedipus the King and Antigone. Trans. Arnott, Peter D.Illinois: Crofts Classics.Google Scholar
Whitford, Margaret. 1991. Luce Irigaray: Philosophy in the feminine. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Winnubst, Shannon. Embodying both Irigaray and Foucault. Paper presented a meeting of The Society of Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy, 1997.Google Scholar