Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 May 2019
T. R. Malthus was deeply interested in how his principle of population operated in societies distant to, and different from, his own. In this respect, China served as an intriguing case, already famous in his own time for its large and dense population and the central regulation of a closed economy. Malthus drew on both centuries-old Jesuit material and recent accounts from the Macartney embassy to the Qianlong emperor to assess its past and present food–land–population dynamics. This article explores Malthus's interest in China in the context of British public and private commercial interest in opening its trade, not least interest from his own East India Company. Historiographically, Malthus's China has been critiqued as an early rendition of orientalist demographic transition, posing a dichotomy of East/West fertility and mortality change. In disagreement with this interpretation, this article argues Malthus's key distinction was not East/West but Old World/New World.
My thanks to Helen Dunstan and Henrietta Harrison for advice and assistance with this article, and to the Master and Fellows of Jesus College, Cambridge, for access to the Old Library Malthus Family Collection.
1 Lee, J., ‘Food supply and population growth in southwest China, 1250–1850’, Journal of Asian Studies, 41 (1982), pp. 711–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Zhao, Gang, Man and land in Chinese history: an economic analysis (Stanford, CA, 1986)Google Scholar; Dunstan, Helen, State or merchant? Political economy and political process in 1740s China (Cambridge, MA, 2006)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Wong, R. Bin, China transformed: historical change and the limits of European experience (Ithaca, NY, 2000)Google Scholar.
2 [Malthus, Thomas Robert], Essay on the principle of population (London, 1798), pp. 56–7Google Scholar.
3 See Bayly, C. A., The imperial meridian (London, 1989)Google Scholar.
4 Pomeranz, Kenneth, The great divergence: China, Europe, and the making of the modern world economy (Princeton, NJ, 2001)Google Scholar.
5 Lee, James Z. and Feng, Wang, One quarter of humanity: Malthusian mythology and Chinese realities, 1700–2000 (Cambridge, MA, 2001)Google Scholar.
6 Duchesne, Ricardo, ‘Malthus and the demographic systems of modern Europe and imperial China: a critique of Lee and Feng’, Review of Radical Political Economics, 35 (2003), pp. 534–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
7 Lee and Feng, One quarter of humanity, p. 16.
8 Bashford, Alison and Chaplin, Joyce E., The new worlds of Thomas Robert Malthus: re-reading the principle of population (Princeton, NJ, 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
9 Mills, R. C., The colonization of Australia, 1829–1842 (London, 1915)Google Scholar; Winch, Donald, Classical political economy and colonies (Cambridge, MA, 1965)Google Scholar; Mehta, Uday Singh, Liberalism and empire: a study in nineteenth-century British liberal thought (Chicago, IL, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Pitts, Jennifer, A turn to empire: the rise of imperial liberalism in Britain and France (Princeton, NJ, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Smits, Katherine, ‘John Stuart Mill on the Antipodes: settler violence against Indigenous peoples and the legitimacy of colonial rule’, Australian Journal of Politics and History, 54 (2008), pp. 1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ballantyne, Tony, ‘The theory and practice of empire building: Edward Gibbon Wakefield and systematic colonisation’, in Aldrich, Robert and McKenzie, Kirsten, eds., The Routledge history of Western empires (London, 2013)Google Scholar; Bell, Duncan, ‘John Stuart Mill on colonies’, Political Theory, 38 (2010), pp. 34–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
10 Bashford and Chaplin, New worlds, chs. 3–5.
11 Malthus, T. R., Essay on the principle of population (2nd edn, London, 1803)Google Scholar, Books i and ii.
12 Gottfried Leibniz, Preface to the Novissima Sinica (1697/9). See Riley, Patrick, ‘Leibniz's political and moral philosophy in the “Novissima Sinica”’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 60 (1999), pp. 217–39Google Scholar.
13 Millar, Ashley Eva, ‘Revisiting the sinophilia/sinophobia dichotomy in the European Enlightenment through Adam Smith's “Duties of government”’, Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science, 38 (2010), pp. 716–37Google Scholar; Christie, William, ‘China in early Romantic periodicals’, European Romantic Review, 27 (2016), pp. 25–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Whelan, Frederick G., Enlightenment political thought and non-Western societies (London, 2009), pp. 30–1CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
14 Kow, Simon, China in early Enlightenment political thought (London, 2017)Google Scholar.
15 Jacobsen, Stefan Gaarsmand, ‘Physiocracy and the Chinese model’, in Ma, Ying and Trautwwein, Hans-Michael, eds., Thoughts on economic development in China (Abingdon, 2013), p. 21Google Scholar.
16 Hevia, James, Cherishing men from afar: Qing guest ritual and the Macartney embassy of 1793 (Durham, NC, 1995), p. 68CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
17 de Secondat, Charles Louis, Montesquieu, Baron de, The complete works of M. de Montesquieu (4 vols., London, 1777)Google Scholar, ‘The spirit of laws’, i, p. 163.
18 ‘The Chinese have the greatest uniformity of character imaginable: though the air and climate in different parts of those vast dominions, admit of very considerable variations.’ Hume, David, ‘Of national characters’, in Essays, moral, political, literary (London, 1777)Google Scholar, Part i, Essay xxi. See also Whelan, Enlightenment political thought, pp. 29–37.
19 Malthus, Essay (1798), p. 56.
20 See Hevia, Cherishing men from afar, p. 86; March, Andrew, The idea of China (New York, NY, 1974), pp. 23–45Google Scholar.
21 Lavely, William and Wong, R. Bin, ‘Revising the Malthusian narrative: the comparative study of population dynamics in late imperial China’, Journal of Asian Studies, 57 (1998), p. 718CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Lavely and Wong rely mainly on date from McEvedy and Jones: McEvedy, Colin and Jones, Richard, Atlas of world population history (London, 1978)Google Scholar.
22 Smith, Adam, An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations (1776), ed. Cannan, Edwin (New York, NY, 1994)Google Scholar, ‘On the wages of labour’, book 1, ch. 8, p. 83. See Hanley, Ryan Patrick, ‘The “wisdom of the state”: Adam Smith on China and Tartary’, American Political Science Review, 108 (2014), pp. 1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
23 Smith, Wealth of nations, ed. Cannan, book 1, ch. 8, p. 82.
24 Inverarity Manuscript, ch. 8, p. 30, question 10, Cambridge University Library, Marshall.c.35. J. D. Inverarity's copy of Smith, Adam, An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations (Edinburgh, 1829)Google Scholar, holds extensive interleaved notes from Malthus's lectures, comprising questions on the text set by Malthus and his prescribed answers. Inverarity was one of Malthus's students at the East India College. See also Pullen, J. M., ‘Notes from Malthus: the Inverarity Manuscript’, History of Political Economy, 13 (1981), pp. 794–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
25 Bashford and Chaplin, New worlds, pp. 10–11.
26 Staunton, Sir George, An authentic account of an embassy from the king of Great Britain to the emperor of China (3 vols., London, 1797)Google Scholar.
27 For the Macartney embassy, the Stauntons, and interpretation, see Harrison, Henrietta, ‘A faithful interpreter? Li Zibiao and the 1793 Macartney embassy to China’, International History Review (2018) DOI: 10.1080/07075332.2018.1516685Google Scholar.
28 Banks also selected and arranged the sequence of engravings in Staunton's Account. ‘Papers concerning publication of the account of Lord Macartney's embassy to China, ca 1797’, Mitchell Library, Sydney, papers of Sir Joseph Banks, series 62, doc. 1–4. Staunton was Fellow of Royal Society from 1797.
29 Staunton, Account, iii, p. 467. See also Malthus, Essay (1803). ‘Chow-ta-Zhin, a man of business and precision, cautious in advancing facts, and proceeding generally upon official documents, delivered, at the request of the Embassador, a statement to him, taken from one of the public offices in the capital, and printed in the Appendix to this work, of the inhabitants of the fifteen ancient provinces of China’ (p. 146). For Qiao Renjie, see Mosca, Matthew W., From frontier policy to foreign policy: the question of India and the transformation of geopolitics in Qing China (Stanford, CA, 2013), pp. 149–54Google Scholar; Hevia, Cherishing men from afar, p. 90. Thanks to Henrietta Harrison for discussion on ‘Chow-ta-zhin’.
30 Qianlong emperor letter to George III in Chang, Elizabeth H., ed., British travel writing from China, 1798–1901, i: Early encounters, 1798–1824 (London, 2010)Google Scholar. See also Harrison, Henrietta, ‘The Qianlong emperor's letter to George III and the early twentieth-century origins of ideas about traditional China's foreign relations’, American Historical Review, 122 (2017), pp. 680–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
31 Hevia, Cherishing men from afar, pp. 72–3.
32 Berg, Maxine, ‘Britain, industry and perceptions of China: Matthew Boulton, “useful knowledge” and the Macartney embassy to China 1792–1794’, Journal of Global History, 1 (2006), pp. 269–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
33 Meares, John, Voyages made in the years 1788 and 1789, from China to the north west coast of America to which are prefixed, and introductory narrative of a voyage performed in 1786, from Bengal, in the ship Nootka; observations on the probably existence of a North West Passage; and some account of the trade between the north west coast of America and China; and the latter country and Great Britain (London, 1790)Google Scholar.
34 Ibid., p. lxvii.
35 Lettres édifiantes et curieuses, écrites des missions étrangères (de la Compagnie de Jesus) (Paris, 1780). Twenty-four volumes of this edition are in the Malthus Collection, Old Library, Jesus College, Cambridge, MC.1.13–36. Staunton had been educated at the Jesuit College in Toulouse. There, he read the extensive Jesuit writings on China.
36 Golden, Sean, ‘From the Society of Jesus to the East India Company: a case study in the social history of translation’, in Rose, Marilyn Gaddis, ed. Beyond the Western tradition: essay on translation (Binghamton, NY, 2000), pp. 199–215Google Scholar; Ross, A. C., A vision betrayed: the Jesuits in Japan and China, 1542–1742 (Edinburgh, 1994)Google Scholar.
37 Malthus, Essay (1803), pp. 152–3.
38 For Malthus's use of travel accounts and first-hand observation, see Bashford and Chaplin, New worlds, chs. 3–5.
39 Connelly, Matthew, Fatal misconception: the struggle to control world population (Cambridge, MA, 2008)Google Scholar; Bashford, Alison, Global population: history, geopolitics, and life on Earth (New York, NY, 2014)Google Scholar.
40 Staunton, Account, iii, p. 388.
41 Ibid., pp. 388–9.
42 Malthus, Essay (1803), p. 156.
43 Ibid., p. 145.
44 Slaves are to be counted within the household, Malthus stated. Malthus here was extending David Hume's commentary on slaves, their reproduction, and methods for counting households, an engagement with Hume most fully undertaken in his chapter on Africa. For Malthus, slavery, and Africa, see Bashford and Chaplin, New worlds, pp. 178–80.
45 Staunton, Account, iii, pp. 388–9.
46 Wrigley, E. A. and Schofield, R. S., The population history of England, 1541–1871 (Cambridge, 1989), p. 534Google Scholar.
47 Staunton, Account, iii, pp. 388–9.
48 Malthus, Essay (1803), p. 145.
49 Meares, Voyages, p. xcii.
50 Ibid., p. lxxxvi.
51 Lee and Feng, One quarter of humanity, p. 19.
52 Staunton, Account. Reprinted in Malthus.
53 Staunton, Account, iii, p. 389.
54 Malthus, Essay (1798), ch. 10.
55 Malthus, Essay (1803), p. 149.
56 Ibid., p. 148.
57 Ibid., p. 49.
58 Staunton, Account, iii, pp. 386–7. In drawing from accounts such as that of Staunton, Malthus was normally meticulous in his citations. But in this chapter, almost an entire page of Staunton was reprinted verbatim, and although containing a footnote, was unusually not in quotation marks.
59 Smith, Wealth of nations, ed. Cannan, book 1, ch. 11, ‘Of the rent of land’, p. 170. Staunton also referred to this passage from Smith in his Account, iii, p. 361.
60 Malthus, Essay (1803), pp. 151, 153.
61 Lavely and Wong, ‘Revising the Malthusian narrative’, p. 714.
62 Montesquieu, Complete works, ‘The spirit of laws’, ii, p. 128. See Pereira, Jacques, Montesquieu et la Chine (Paris, 2008)Google Scholar.
63 ‘The early marriages of men in easy circumstances have been already mentioned; with the poor, marriage is a measure of prudence, because the children, particularly the sons, are bound to maintain their parents. Whatever is strongly recommended, and generally practised, is at length considered as a kind of religious duty; and this union, as such, takes place whenever, there is the least prospect of subsistence for a future family. That prospect, however, is not always realized; and children … are sometimes abandoned by the wretched authors of their being.’ Staunton, Account, ii, pp. 334–5.
64 Malthus, Essay (1803), p. 150.
65 Ibid., p. 154.
66 Ibid., p. 151.
67 Smith, Wealth of nations, ed. Cannan, book 1, ch. 8, ‘On the wages of labour’, p. 82.
68 Lee and Feng, One quarter of humanity.
69 Malthus, Essay (1803).
70 Lavely and Wong, ‘Revising the Malthusian narrative’, p. 735.
71 Lee and Feng, One quarter of humanity, p. 7.
72 Staunton, Account, ii, p. 337.
73 Smith, Wealth of nations, ed. Cannan, book 1, ch. 8, ‘On the wages of labour’, p. 83.
74 Staunton, Account, ii; Malthus, Essay (1803), p. 151, citing Duhalde, Jean Baptiste, The general history of China, trans. Brookes, R. (2 vols., London, 1738)Google Scholar, i, p. 277; Malthus, Essay (1803), p. 152, quoting Premare in Lettres édifiantes, xvi, p. 394.
75 Lavely and Wong, ‘Revising the Malthusian narrative’, p. 735.
76 See Bashford and Chaplin, New worlds, pp. 147, 158.
77 Between 1808 and 1829, perhaps ten writers trained at Haileybury were sent to the East India Company Chinese Establishment. Patricia James papers, Old Library, Jesus College Cambridge, box 6, iv: 1, p. 4429.
78 The East India Company sales of tea was about 5 million pounds in 1780. See Porter, David, ‘A peculiar but uninteresting nation: China and the discourse of commerce in eighteenth-century England’, Eighteenth-Century Studies, 33 (2000), p. 182CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
79 See Kitson, Peter J., Forging romantic China: Sino-British cultural exchange, 1760–1840 (Cambridge, 2013), p. 128CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
80 Meares, Voyages, p. lxxvii.
81 Ibid., p. xxviii
82 Ibid., p. xci.
83 Ibid., p. lxciii.
84 Kitson, Forging romantic China; Hevia, Cherishing men from afar.
85 Emperor Qian Long's letter to King George III, 1793, in Backhouse, E. and Bland, J. O. P., Annals and memoirs of the court of Peking (Boston, MA, 1914), pp. 322–31Google Scholar.
86 Marjoribanks, Charles, Letter to the Right Hon. Charles Grant, president of the Board of Control, on the present state of British intercourse with China (London, 1833)Google Scholar, pp. 17, 25.
87 Meares certainly sought an open China; ‘The present exclusion of the Euroepan nations from all the ports of the Chinese empire, except Canton, is a serious disadvantage to Great Britain’, Meares, Voyages, p. lxxxi
88 Bashford, Global population, p. 29; Bashford and Chaplin, New worlds, pp. 147–51.
89 Malthus, Thomas Robert, Principles of political economy: considered with a view to their practical application (London, 1836), pp. 102–3Google Scholar.
90 Staunton, George, Ta Tsing leu lee, being the fundamental laws, and a selection from the supplementary statutes, of the penal code of China (London, 1810)Google Scholar.
91 Lavely and Wong, ‘Revising the Malthusian narrative’, p. 714.
92 For global ‘wastelands’ and Malthus, see Bashford, Global population, chs. 1, 5.
93 Chaplin, Joyce E., Benjamin Franklin's political arithmetic: a materialist view of humanity (Washington, DC, 2008)Google Scholar; Bashford, Global population, ch. 1.
94 Smith, Wealth of nations, ed. Cannan, book 1, ch. 8., ‘On the wages of labour’, p. 81.
95 Ibid., book 4, ch. 7, ‘Of colonies’, pp. 616–17.
96 Malthus, Essay (1803), p. 153.
97 Inverarity MS, Smith, Wealth of nations, p. 28, question 8.
98 Godwin, William, Of population (London, 1820), pp. 50–2Google Scholar. See also review of William Godwin, Of population in The Investigator or Quarterly Magazine, 3 (July 1821), p. 96.
99 Godwin, Of population, pp. 440–1.
100 Ibid., p. 449.
101 Ibid., p. 451.
102 Martineau, Harriet, Illustrations of political economy (London, 1832–4)Google Scholar; Marx on China, 1853–1860. Articles from the New York Daily Tribune with an introduction and notes by Dona Toor (London, 1951).
103 Wong, China transformed, p. 1.
104 Greenhalgh, Susan, ‘Population studies in China: privileged past, anxious future’, Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs, 24 (1990), pp. 357–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
105 Hayes, Adrian C., ‘Was Malthus right about China?’, China Journal, 47 (2002), pp. 109–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar.