Skip to main content Accessibility help

Searching for Modern Culture's Beautiful Harmony: Schlegel and Hegel on Irony

  • Elizabeth Millán (a1)


Goethe and Friedrich Schiller stand together immortalised in Ernst Rietschel's statue at the centre of Weimar. In their lifetime, Goethe and Schiller shaped the culture of German-speaking lands, not only through their poetry, plays, and novels, but also in their role as editors of journals that helped to set the intellectual tone of the period. Schiller's journal Die Horen (1795-1797) and Goethe's Propyläen (1798-1800), although short-lived, were important literary vehicles of the period and provided a forum that brought scientists, historians, philosophers, and poets into conversation with one another. The late 1700s and early 1800s were years of intense intellectual development in Germanspeaking lands; the arts flourished and aesthetics developed as a serious branch of philosophy.

During the ‘Age of Goethe and Schiller’, philosophy was dominated by Kant's philosophy and its post-Kantian variations. A problem with traditional philosophical histories of this period is the overwhelmingly Hegelian reading of it, a reading that subsumes all of the so-called minor figures under the shadows of the great system builder, Hegel. Richard Kroner's influential Von Kant bis Hegel of 1921 set the tone for this reading. Silenced by such narratives are the voices of the early German Romantics, a group of thinkers whose impudence created problems for them, and whose work posed hermeneutical challenges that continue to plague a proper understanding of the movement and the worth of its contributions. As we shall see, Hegel himself began to prepare the ground for a history of philosophy that would dismiss the contributions of the early German Romantics, a dismissal that is unfair and unfortunate: unfair because it is based on false characterisations of the movement, and unfortunate because such misreadings lead us to overlook the wealth of insights offered by the early German Romantics.



Hide All
Beiser, F. (2002), German Idealism: The Struggle against Subjectivism, 1781-1801. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Beiser, F. (2003), The Romantic Imperative: The Concept of Early German Romanticism. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Bernstein, J. M. (ed.) (2003), Classic and Romantic German Aesthetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bernstein, R. J. (1983), Beyond Objectivism and Relativism. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bubner, R. (1975), ‘Kant, Transcendental Argument and the Problem of Deduction’, Review of Metaphysics 28.3: 453–67.
Bubner, R. (2003), The Innovations of Idealism, trans. Walker, N.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eldridge, R. (1997), Leading a Human Life. Wittgenstein, Intentionality, and Romanticism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Firchow, P. (trans.) (1991), Friedrich Schlegel Philosophical Fragments. Albany: SUNY Press.
Frank, M. (1995), ‘Alle Wahrheit is Relativ, Alles Wissen Symbolisch: Motive der Grundsatz-Skepsis in der frühen Jenaer Romantik (1796)’, Revue Internationale de Philosophie 197: 403–36.
Frank, M. (1997), Unendliche Annäherung. Die Anfänge der philosophischen Frühromantik. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Frank, M. (2004), The Philosophical Foundations of Early German Romanticism, trans. Millán-Zaibert, E.. Albany: SUNY Press.
Gammon, M. (2000), ‘Modernity and the Crisis of Aesthetic Representation in Hegel's Early Writings’ in Maker, W. (ed.), Hegel and Aesthetics. Albany: SUNY Press.
Gearey, J. (ed.) (1986), Goethe, Essays on Art and Literature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Goethe, J.W. von (1999), Schriften zur Kunst und Literatur, eds. Harald Steinhagen, et al. . Stuttgart: Reclam.
Goethe, J. W. von (1994), Essays on Art and Literature, ed. Gearey, J., trans. Ellen, and Nardroff, Ernest H. von. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Haack, S. (2004), ‘Coherence, Consistency, Cogency, Congruity, Cohesiveness, &c.: Remain Calm! Don't Go Overboard!’, New Literary History 35: 167–83.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1986), Vorlesungen über die Ästhetik, ed. Moldenhauer, E. and Michel, K. M.. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Hegel, G. W. F. (2004), Introductory Lectures on Aesthetics, trans. Bosanquet, B., ed. Inwood, M.. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Humboldt, W. von (1973), ‘On the Historian's Task’ in Iggers, G. G. and Moltke, K. von (eds), The Theory and Practice of History: Leopold von Ranke. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
Kaufmann, W. (1972), ‘The Hegel Myth and Its Method’ in MacIntyre, A. (ed.), Hegel: A Collection of Critical Essays. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
Lacoue-Labarthe, P. and Nancy, J.-L. (1988), The Literary Absolute. The Theory of Literature in German Romanticism, trans. Barnard, P. and Lester, C.. Albany: SUNY Press.
Littlejohns, R. (2004), ‘Early Romanticism’ in Mahoney, D. (ed.), The Literature of German Romanticism. Rochester: University of Rochester Press.
Millán-Zaibert, E. (2007), Friedrich Schlegel and the Emergence of Romantic Philosophy. Albany: SUNY Press.
Mittman, E. and Strand, M. S. (1997), ‘Representing Self and Other in Early German Romanticism’ in Schulte-Sasse, J. et al. (eds), Theory as Practice. A Critical Anthology of Early German Romantic Writings. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Norman, J. (2000), ‘Squaring the Romantic Circle: Hegel.s Critique of Schlegel.s Theories of Art’ in Maker, W. (ed.), Hegel and Aesthetics. Albany: SUNY Press.
Novalis, (1965), Novalis Schriften, ed. Samuel, R., Mähl, H.-J. and Schutz, G.. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Pöggeler, O. (1954/1955; new edition, 1998), Hegels Kritik der Romantik. München: Fink Verlag.
Rorty, R. (1987), ‘Thugs and Theorists: A Reply to Bernstein’, Political Theory 15.4: 564–90.
Rorty, R. (1989), Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rush, F. (2006), ‘Irony and Romantic Subjectivity’ in Kompridis, N. (ed.), Philosophical Romanticism. London: Routledge.
Schlegel, F. (1958ff), Kritische Friedrich Schlegel Ausgabe, ed. Behler, E., Anstett, J.-J., Eichner, H. et al. Paderborn: Schöningh.
Schlegel, F. (2003), On Incomprehensibility in Bernstein, J. M. (ed.), Classic and Romantic German Aesthetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Schulte-Sasse, J. et al. (eds) (1997), Theory as Practice: A Critical Anthology of Early German Romantic Writings. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Seyhan, A. (1992), Representation and Its Discontents. The Critical Legacy of German Romanticism. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Stoljar, M.M. (ed. And trans.) (1997), Novalis. Philosophical Writings. Albany: SUNY Press.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Searching for Modern Culture's Beautiful Harmony: Schlegel and Hegel on Irony

  • Elizabeth Millán (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.