Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T23:18:21.135Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response to Pinkard

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2015

Frederick C Beiser
Frederick C Beiser*
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain , Volume 17 , Issue 2: number 34 , Autumn/Winter 1996 , pp. 21 - 26
Copyright
Copyright © The Hegel Society of Great Britain 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Pinkard actually says “logic and consciousness”. But for the sake of simplicity and the most charitable reading of Hartmann, I will consider only the case of logic. It is clear that Hartmann's interpretation of Hegel best works for his Wissenschaft der Logik; there are clear difficulties in applying it to the Phänomenologie des Geistes, as Pinkard admits, given the importance of history for that work.