Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T11:22:25.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reply to Redding, Rosen and Wood

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2013

Thom Brooks
Thom Brooks*
Affiliation:
University of Durham

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Hegel's Philosophy of Right is more than a major work of political and legal philosophy; it is a battleground for two different interpretive approaches. My Hegel's Political Philosophy: A Systematic Reading of the Philosophy of Right argues that these approaches are mistaken about their differences and that one approach offers a more compelling interpretation of Hegel's Philosophy of Right than the other. I will briefly outline my defence of the systematic reading of the Philosophy of Right before replying to the constructive criticisms raised by Redding, Rosen and Wood.

There are two different interpretative approaches to understanding Hegel's Philosophy of Right. These are the metaphysical and the non-metaphysical readings. The former often highlight Hegel's insistence that some political states may be considered more ‘true’ or ‘actual’ than others. This reading also often emphasises the special place of religion in Hegel's philosophical system, for example. In contrast, the non-metaphysical reading argues that such an interpretation is not only unattractive, but perhaps even unnecessary because Hegel's views on ‘actuality’ and ‘actualization’ are less controversial than traditional metaphysical readings of Hegel's philosophy have claimed. Commentators must choose between these competing camps and interpretations of Hegel's work are conceived within these approaches. Importantly, each reading claims that its approach best captures Hegel's philosophical importance. But would Hegel endorse either the metaphysical or non-metaphysical reading?

The problem is that this debate rests on a central misconception about Hegel's philosophy. The debate is characterized as a disagreement about the role and perhaps the very existence of metaphysics in Hegel's philosophy. But this is a false impression. It is virtually nowhere in doubt that metaphysics is present in Hegel's philosophy, including his Philosophy of Right. Therefore, the debate between a ‘metaphysical’ and ‘non-metaphysical’ reading of Hegel's works is not a debate about whether these works contain metaphysics. The characterization of the debate invites a false impression about what is at stake.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , Autumn/Winter 2012 , pp. 23 - 35
Copyright
Copyright © The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2012

References

Brooks, Thom (2007a), Hegel's Political Philosophy: A Systematic Reading of the Philosophy of Right. Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Thom (2007b), ‘No Rubber Stamp: Hegel's Constitutional Monarch’;, History of Political Thought 28: 91–119 Google Scholar
Beiser, Frederick (1995), ’Hegel, a Non-Metaphysician? A Polemic Review of H. T. Engelhardt and Terry Pinkard (eds.), Hegel Reconsidered’, Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 32: 1–13.Google Scholar
Beiser, Frederick (1996), ‘Response to Pinkard’, Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 34: 21–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beiser, Frederick (2005), Hegel. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Thom (2004), ‘The Right to Trial by Jury’, Journal of Applied Philosophy 21: 197–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Thom (2007), Hegel's Political Philosophy: A Systematic Reading of the Philosophy of Right. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Thom (2012a), Punishment. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Thom (2012b), ‘Hegel and the Unified Theory of Punishment’ in Brooks, T. (ed.), Hegel's Philosophy of Right. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 103–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Thom (2012b), ‘Hegel and the Unified Theory of Punishment’ in Brooks, T. (ed.), Hegel's Philosophy of Right. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 103–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Thom (2012c), ‘Between Statism and Cosmopolitanism: Hegel and the Possibility of Global Justice’ in Buchwalter, A. (ed.), Hegel and Global Justice. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 65–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Thom (2012d), ‘Reciprocity as Mutual Recognition’, The Good Society 21: 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Thom (2012e). ‘Reply to Critics’, Hegel's Political Philosophy: A Systematic Reading of the Philosophy of Right, second edition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 162–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudley, Will (2002), Hegel, Nietzsche, and Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelhardt, Jr., Tristram, H. and Pinkard, Terry (eds.) (1994), Hegel Reconsidered: Beyond Metaphysics and the Authoritarian State. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michael, O. (1994), Hegel's Social Philosophy: The Project of Reconciliation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1977), Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. Miller, A. V.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1991), Elements of the Philosophy of Right, ed. Wood, A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1999), Hegel's Science of Logic, trans. Miller, A. V.. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books.Google Scholar
Houlgate, Stephen (1991), Freedom, Truth and History: An Introduction to Hegel's Philosophy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Houlgate, Stephen (2005), An Introduction to Hegel: Freedom, Truth and History. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Knowles, Dudley (2002), Hegel and the Philosophy of Right. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Neuhouser, Frederick (2000), Foundations of Hegel's Social Theory: Actualizing Freedom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelczynski, Z. A. (1964), ‘An Introductory Essay’ in Hegel, G. W. F., Hegel's Political Writings, trans. Knox, T. M.. Oxford, Clarendon, pp. 1–137.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (1999), ‘Justice as Fairness: Political not Metaphysical’ in Collected Papers, ed. Freeman, Samuel. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, pp. 388–414.Google Scholar
Redding, Paul (2012), ‘Thom Brooks's Project of a Systematic Reading of Hegel's Philosophy of Right’, Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 66: 1–9 Google Scholar
Richardson, Henry S. (1989), ‘The Logical Structure of Sittlichkeit: A Reading of Hegel's Philosophy of Right’, Idealistic Studies 19: 62–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, Michael (1982), Hegel's Dialectic and Its Criticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, Michael (2012), ‘The Ruined Castle: Thom Brooks, Hegel's Political Philosophy’, Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 66: 10–15 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, Stanley (1974), G. W. F. Hegel: An Introduction to the Science of Wisdom. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Steinberger, Peter J. (1988), Logic and Politics: Hegel's Philosophy of Right. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, Robert (2002), Hegel and the Phenomenology of Spirit. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen (2012), ‘Thom Brooks and the “Systematic” Reading of Hegel’, Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 66: 16–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar