Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Meta-Encyclopaedic Reflections on the Beginning of Philosophy

  • Umur Başdaş (a1)

Abstract

Since in Hegel's view the end of philosophy coincides with its beginning, it is reasonable to expect that the end of the Encyclopaedia sheds some light on the Science of Logic. The Encyclopaedia concludes with three syllogisms in which logic, nature and spirit are related to each other in three different ways. This article analyses these three final syllogisms with an eye to how they can contribute to our understanding of the logical movement that starts from pure being. Trendelenburg and Schelling, like many others after them, think that Hegel's project in the Science of Logic is doomed from the start, because there can be no such thing as a non-temporal, purely logical movement. I argue that the three final syllogisms contain Hegel's response to this challenge. I call them ‘meta-encyclopaedic reflections’ in the sense that they take the whole encyclopaedic presentation of the Hegelian system as an object of critical inquiry and identify its limitations. The core of my approach is to examine how each one of these syllogisms situate us, namely the philosophizing subjects, vis-à-vis the world as disclosed by them. They demand that we shift from a third-person to a first-person perspective towards the world. The logical categories initially appear to move of their own accord only due to the limitations of the third-person perspective of the encyclopaedic presentation, which is to be sublated in a higher, first-person perspective. Hence, Hegel would happily admit that a purely logical movement is a mere appearance, but he would also claim that his philosophy can immanently explain the necessity of this appearance in the beginning of philosophy, and explain it better than his critics.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Meta-Encyclopaedic Reflections on the Beginning of Philosophy
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Meta-Encyclopaedic Reflections on the Beginning of Philosophy
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Meta-Encyclopaedic Reflections on the Beginning of Philosophy
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

References

Hide All
Beach, E. A. (2010–11), ‘Hegel's Mediated Immediacies: A Reply to Dieter Henrich’, The Owl of Minerva 42:1–2: 153217.
Beaufort, J. (1983), Die drei Schlüsse. Untersuchungen zur Stellung der ‘Phänomenologie’ in Hegels System der Wissenschaft. Würzburg: Königshausen and Neumann.
Bruaire, C. (1964), Logique et religion chrétienne dans la philosophie de Hegel. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
Burbidge, J. W. (2006), The Logic of Hegel's ‘Logic’: An Introduction. Ontario: Broadview.
Ferrini, C. (1999), ‘God and Nature in Hegel's Logic’, Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 20:1–2: 6583.
Ferrini, C. (2012), ‘Hegel on Nature and Spirit: Some Systematic Remarks’, Hegel-Studien 46: 116150.
Fulda, H. F. (1975), Das Problem einer Einleitung in Hegels Wissenschaft der Logik. Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann.
Füzesi, N. (2004), Hegels drei Schlüsse. Freiburg/Munich: Alber Thesen.
Geraets, T. F. (1975), ‘Les trois lectures philosophiques de l'Encyclopédie ou la réalisation du concept de la philosophie chez Hegel’, Hegel-Studien 10: 231254.
Henrich, D. (1971), ‘Anfang und Methode der Logik’, in his Hegel im Kontext. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Houlgate, S. (2006), The Opening of Hegel's Logic: From Being to Infinity. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.
Inwood, M. J. (2010), A Commentary on Hegel's Philosophy of Mind. Oxford: Clarendon.
Léonard, A. (1971), ‘La structure du système hégélien’, Revue philosophique de Lovain. Quatrième série, tome 69, n°4: 495–524.
Rockmore, T. (1989), ‘Foundationalism and Hegelian Logic’, The Owl of Minerva 21:1: 4150.
Schelling, F. W. J. von (1994), On the History of Modern Philosophy, trans. Bowie, A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Theunissen, M. (1970), Hegels Lehre vom absoluten Geist als theologisch-politischer Traktat. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Trendelenburg, F. A. (1993), ‘The Logical Question in Hegel's System’, in Stern, R. (ed.), G. W. F. Hegel: Critical Assessments, vol. 1. London: Routledge.
Van der Meulen, J. (1958), Hegel. Die gebrochene Mitte. Hamburg: Meiner.
Werckmeister, G. (2007), Die etablierte Hegelforschung zum dreifachen Schluss. Available online at: http://www.georg-werckmeister.de/downloads/zum-forschungsstand.pdf
Werckmeister, G. (2010), Hegels absoluter Schluss als logische Grundstruktur der Objektivität. Südwestdeutscher Verlag für Hochschulschriften.

Meta-Encyclopaedic Reflections on the Beginning of Philosophy

  • Umur Başdaş (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.