Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T23:13:16.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reading Notes, Autumn 1989

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2014

Ghiţa Ionescu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , 01 January 1990 , pp. 62 - 67
Copyright
Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See article by Quentin Pell, in the Financial Times, 20 November 1989.

2 ibid. (My italics.)

3 In The Breakup of the Soviet Empire in Eastern Europe, Penguin Special, Penguin Books, 1965, p.157.

4 In The Politics of the European Communist States, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London, 1967, p. 271; French edition, L’avenir de l’Europe orientale, 1967; German edition, Die Zukunft des Kommunismus in Osteuropa, 1967.

5 ibid, p. 29.

6 In Comparative Communist Politics, Macmillan, London, 1972, p. 54.

7 ibid., p. 51, italics in the text.

8 In Politics and the Pursuit of Happiness, Longmans, 1984.

9 With the exception of my theory of the ‘apparat state’, which has since then been differently interpreted in Althusser’s theory of L’Appareil, and of my insistence on the then hardly noticed institution of the nomenklatura, which has only very recently (1980) been given full treatment by M. Voslenski.