Skip to main content Accessibility help

Putting Politics in the Lab: A Review of Lab Experiments in Political Science

  • Damien Bol


Experiments are now common in political science. They are an excellent methodological tool to estimate the causal effect of a treatment on an outcome. In this article, I review the use of lab experiments in political science. After a brief report on their popularity and advantages, I distinguish two ideal-types (economics-based and psychology-based) and outline the main lines of division between them. In the final section, I discuss the main challenges that lab experimentalists are facing today.



Hide All

Damien Bol is Assistant Professor in the Department of Political Economy at King’s College London. Contact email:



Hide All
Adida, C.L., Laitin, D.D. and Valfort, M.-A. (2016), ‘“One Muslim is Enough!” Evidence from a Field Experiment in France’, Annals of Economics and Statistics, 121/122: 121160.
Amorim Neto, O. and Cox, G.W. (1997), ‘Electoral Institutions, Cleavage Structures, and the Number of Parties’, American Journal of Political Science, 41(1): 149174.
Angrist, J.D. and Pischke, J.-S. (2010), ‘The Credibility Revolution in Empirical Economics: How Better Research Design is Taking the Con out of Econometrics’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(2): 330.
Baker, M. (2016), ‘1,500 Scientists Lift the Lid on Reproducibility’, Nature, 533(7604): 452454.
Bawn, K. (1993), ‘The Logic of Institutional Preferences: German Electoral Law as a Social Choice Outcome’, American Journal of Political Science, 37(4): 965989.
Belot, M., Duch, R. and Miller, L. (2015), ‘A Comprehensive Comparison of Students and Non-students in Classic Experimental Games’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organisation, 113(1): 2633.
Benjamin, D.J., Berger, J.O., Johannesson, M. et al. (2018), ‘Redefining Statistical Significance’, Nature Human Behavior, 2: 610.
Blais, A. and Carty, K.R. (1990), ‘Does Proportional Representation Foster Voter Turnout?’, European Journal of Political Research, 18(2): 167181.
Blais, A., Labbé St-Vincent, S., Pilet, J.-B. and Treibich, R. (2016), ‘Voting Correctly in Lab Elections with Monetary Incentives: The Impact of District Magnitude’, Party Politics, 22(4): 544551.
Boix, C. (1999), ‘Setting the Rules of the Game: The Choice of Electoral Systems in Advanced Democracies’, American Political Science Review, 93(3): 609624.
Bol, D. (2019), ‘Experiments: A Tool to Test Causal Relationships’, in F. Morin, C. Olsson and E. Ozlem Atikcan (eds), Key Concepts in Research Methods (Cambridge: Routledge).
Bol, D., Labbé St-Vincent, S. and Lavoie, J.-M. (2016), ‘Recruiting for Laboratory Voting Experiments: Exploring the (Potential) Sampling Bias’, in A. Blais, J.-F. Laslier and K. Van der Straeten (eds), Voting Experiments (New York: Springer): 271286.
Bol, D., Blais, A. and Labbé St-Vincent, S. (2018), ‘Which Matters Most: Party Strategic Exit or Voter Strategic Voting? A Laboratory Experiment’, Political Science Research and Methods, 6(2): 229244.
Carey, J.M. and Hix, S. (2011), ‘The Electoral Sweet Spot: Low Magnitude Proportional Electoral Systems’, American Journal of Political Science, 55(2): 383397.
Cliffort, S. and Jerit, J. (2014), ‘Is There a Cost to Convenience? An Experimental Comparison of Data Quality in Laboratory and Online Studies’, Journal of Experimental Political Science, 1(2): 120131.
Coppock, A. and Green, D.P. (2015), ‘Assessing the Correspondence between Experimental Results Obtained in the Lab and Field: A Review of Recent Social Science Research’, Political Science Research and Methods, 3(1): 113131.
Desposato, S. (2016) (ed.), Ethics in Experiments: Problems and Solutions for Social Scientists and Policy Professionals (London: Routledge).
Dickson, E.S. (2011), ‘Economics Versus Psychology Experiments: Stylization, Incentives, and Deception’, in J.N. Druckman, D.P. Green, J.H. Kuklinski and A. Lupia (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 5871.
Dickson, E.S., Gordon, S.C. and Huber, G.A. (2015), ‘Institutional Sources of Legitimate Authority: An Experimental Investigation’, American Journal of Political Science, 59(1): 109127.
Druckman, J.N., Green, D.P., Kuklinski, J.H. and Lupia, A. (2011), ‘Experimentations in Political Science’, in J.N. Druckman, D.P. Green, J.H. Kuklinski and A. Lupia (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 313.
Druckman, J.N., Fein, J. and Leeper, T.J. (2012), ‘Source of Bias in Public Opinion Stability’, American Political Science Review, 106(2): 430454.
Duffy, J. and Tavits, M. (2008), ‘Beliefs and Voting Decisions: A Test of the Pivotal Voter Model’, American Journal of Political Science, 52(3): 603618.
Eldersveld, S.J. (1956), ‘Experimental Propaganda Techniques and Voting Behavior’, American Political Science Review, 50(1): 154165.
Feddersen, T., Gailmard, S. and Sandron, A. (2009), ‘Moral Bias in Large Elections: Theory and Experimental Evidence’, American Political Science Review, 103(2): 175192.
Gartner, S.S. (2008), ‘The Multiple Effects of Casualties on Public Support for War: An Experimental Approach’, American Political Science Review, 102(1): 95106.
Gilligan, M.J., Pasquale, B.J. and Samii, C. (2014), ‘Civil War and Social Cohesion: Lab-in-the-Field Evidence from Nepal’, American Journal of Political Science, 58(3): 604619.
Gelman, A. and Loken, E. (2013), ‘The Garden of Forking Paths: Why Multiple Comparisons Can Be a Problem, Even When There Is No “Fishing Expedition” or “P-Hacking” And the Research Hypothesis Was Posited Ahead of Time’, mimeo, Columbia University.
Gosnell, H.F. (1926), ‘An Experiment in the Stimulation of Voting’, American Political Science Review, 20(4): 869874.
Gottlieb, J. (2017), ‘Explaining Variation in Broker Strategies: A Lab-in-the-Field Experiment in Senegal’, Comparative Political Studies, 50(11): 15561592.
Herrera, H., Morelli, M. and Palfrey, T. (2014), ‘Turnout and Power Sharing’, Economic Journal, 124(574): 131162.
Jerit, J., Barabas, J. and Clifford, S. (2013), ‘Comparing Contemporaneous Laboratory and Field Experiments on Media Effects’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 77(1): 256282.
Kam, C.D. and Zechmeister, E.J. (2013), ‘Name Recognition and Candidate Support’, American Journal of Political Science, 57(4): 971986.
Kam, C.D., Wilking, J.R. and Zechmeister, E. (2007), ‘“Beyond the Narrow Data Base”: Another Convenience Sample for Experimental Research’, Political Behavior, 29(4): 415440.
Kanthak, K. and Woon, J. (2015), ‘Women Don’t Run? Election Aversion and Candidate Entry’, American Journal of Political Science, 59(3): 595612.
King, G., Keohane, R.O. and Verba, S. (1994), Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
Labbé St-Vincent, S., Blais, A. and Pilet, J.-B. (2016), ‘The Electoral Sweet Spot in the Lab’, Journal of Experimental Political Science, 3(1): 7583.
Lau, R.R. and Redlawsk, D.P. (1997), ‘Voting Correctly’, American Political Science Review, 91(3): 585598.
Levendusky, M.S. (2013), ‘Why Do Partisan Media Polarize Viewers?’, American Journal of Political Science, 57(3): 611623.
Lijphart, A. (1971), ‘Comparative Politics and the Comparative Methods’, American Political Science Review, 65(3): 682693.
Lowell, A.L. (1910), ‘The Physiology of Politics’, American Political Science Review, 4(1): 115.
McCauley, J.F. (2014), ‘The Political Mobilization of Ethnic and Religious Identities in Africa’, American Political Science Review, 108(4): 801816.
McClendon, G. (2012), ‘Ethics of Using Public Officials as Field Experiment Subjects’, Newsletter of the APSA Experiments Section, 3(1): 1320.
McDermott, R. (2002a), ‘Experimental Methodology in Political Science’, Political Analysis, 10(4): 325342.
McDermott, R. (2002b), ‘Experimental Methods in Political Science’, Annual Review of Political Science, 5: 3161.
Morton, R.B. and Williams, K.C. (2010), From Nature to the Lab: The Methodology of Experimental Political Science and the Study of Causality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Mutz, D.C. and Reeves, B. (2005), ‘The New Videomalaise: Effects of Televised Incivility on Political Trust’, American Political Science Review, 99(1): 115.
Open Science Collaboration (2015), ‘Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science’, Science, 349(6251): aac4716.
Palfrey, T.R. (2009), ‘Laboratory Experiments in Political Economy’, Annual Review of Political Science, 12: 379388.
Przeworski, A. and Teune, H. (1970), The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry (Oxford: Wiley Interscience).
Ragin, C.C. (1989), The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies (Berkeley: University of California Press).
Sanders, D. (2012), ‘The Effects of Deliberative Polling in an EU-wide Experiment: Five Mechanisms in Search of an Explanation’, British Journal of Political Science, 42(3): 617640.
Sauermann, J. and Kaiser, A. (2010), ‘Taking Others into Account: Self-interest and Fairness in Majority Decision Making’, American Journal of Political Science, 54(3): 667685.
Schram, A. (2005), ‘Artificiality: The Tension Between Internal and External Validity in Economic Experiments’, Journal of Economic Methodology, 12(2): 225237.
Terris, L.G. and Tykocinsky, O.E. (2016), ‘Inaction Inertia in International Negotiations: The Consequences of Missed Opportunities’, British Journal of Political Science, 46(3): 701717.
White, I., Laird, C.N. and Allen, T.D. (2014), ‘Selling Out? The Politics of Navigating Conflicts between Racial Group Interest and Self-interest’, American Political Science Review, 108(4): 783800.
Willis, D. (2014), ‘Professors’ Research Project Stirs Political Outrage in Montana’, New York Times, 29 October.



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed