Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Elections and Political Regimes

  • Jennifer Gandhi

Abstract

Post-Cold War autocracies appear novel in their use of multiparty elections, attracting the attention of scholars and policymakers alike. A longer historical view, however, reveals that what is unique is not electoral authoritarianism after 1989, but rather the electoral inactivity of autocracies during the Cold War period. Throughout the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, authoritarian regimes have held multiparty elections. The prevalence of these elections begs the question of whether they have any effects on political liberalization and democratization. But the study of authoritarian elections in processes of political change faces a number of theoretical and empirical challenges that can only partly be surmounted with existing approaches.

Copyright

Footnotes

Hide All
*

Jennifer Gandhi is Winship Distinguished Research Professor of Political Science at Emory College of Arts and Sciences. Contact email: jgandh2@emory.edu.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J. (2006), Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy (New York: Cambridge University Press).
Altman, D. and Pérez-Liñán, A. (2002), ‘Assessing the Quality of Democracy: Freedom, Competitiveness and Participation in Eighteen Latin American Countries’, Democratization, 9(2): 85100.
Boix, C., Miller, M. and Rosato, S. (2013), ‘A Complete Data Set of Political Regimes, 1800–2007’, Comparative Political Studies, 46(12): 15231554.
Brownlee, J. (2009), ‘Portents of Pluralism: How Hybrid Regimes Affect Democratic Transitions’, American Journal of Political Science, 53(3): 515532.
Bueno de Mesquita, B., Smith, A., Siverson, R. and Morrow, J. (2005), The Logic of Political Survival (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
Bunce, V. and Wolchik, S. (2010), ‘Defeating Dictators: Electoral Change and Stability in Competitive Authoritarian Regimes’, World Politics, 62(1): 4386.
Capoccia, G. and Ziblatt, D. (2010), ‘The Historical Turn in Democratization Studies: A New Research Agenda for Europe and Beyond’, Comparative Political Studies, 43(8/9): 931968.
Cheibub, J.A., Gandhi, J. and Vreeland, J. (2010), ‘Democracy and Dictatorship Revisited’, Public Choice, 143(1/2): 67101.
Collier, D. and Levitsky, S. (1997), ‘Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research’, World Politics, 49(3): 430451.
Dahl, R. (1972), Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).
Diamond, L. (2002), ‘Thinking about Hybrid Regimes’, Journal of Democracy, 13(2): 2135.
Donno, D. (2013), ‘Elections and Democratization in Authoritarian Regimes’, American Journal of Political Science, 57(3): 703716.
Donno, D. and Roussias, N. (2012), ‘Does Cheating Pay? The Effect of Electoral Misconduct on Party Systems’, Comparative Political Studies, 45(5): 575605.
Doorenspleet, R. (2000), ‘Reassessing the Three Waves of Democratization’, World Politics, 52: 384406.
Gandhi, J. and Lust-Okar, E. (2009), ‘Elections under Authoritarianism’, Annual Review of Political Science, 12: 403422.
van Ham, C. and Lindberg, S.I. (2015), ‘From Sticks to Carrots: Electoral Manipulation in Africa, 1986–2012’, Government and Opposition, 50(3), doi: 10.1017/gov.2015.6 (in this issue).
Hornsby, C. (2012), Kenya: A History since Independence (London: I.B. Tauris).
Howard, M. and Roessler, P. (2006), ‘Liberalizing Electoral Outcomes in Competitive Authoritarian Regimes’, American Journal of Political Science, 50(2): 365381.
Huntington, S. (1991), The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press).
Hyde, S. (2011), The Pseudo-Democrat’s Dilemma: Why Election Observation Became an International Norm (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
Hyde, S. and Marinov, N. (2012), ‘Which Elections Can be Lost?’, Political Analysis, 20(2): 191210.
Hyde, S. and Pallister, K. (forthcoming), ‘Election Administration, Election Observation, and Election Quality’, in J. Gandhi, R. Ruiz-Rufino (eds), Handbook of Comparative Political Institutions (London: Routledge).
Lauth, H.-J. (forthcoming), ‘Informal Institutions’, in J. Gandhi and R. Ruiz-Rufino (eds), Handbook of Comparative Political Institutions (London: Routledge).
Levitsky, S. and Way, L.A. (2002), ‘The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism’, Journal of Democracy, 13(2): 5165.
Levitsky, S. and Way, L.A. (2010), Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Lindberg, S. (2004), ‘The Democratic Qualities of Competitive Elections: Participation, Competition and Legitimacy in Africa’, Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 42(1): 61105.
Lindberg, S. (2006), ‘The Surprising Significance of African Elections’, Journal of Democracy, 17(1): 139151.
Lindberg, S., Coppedge, M., Gerring, J. and Teorell, J. (2014), ‘V-Dem: A New Way to Measure Democracy’, Journal of Democracy, 25(3): 159169.
Lust-Okar, E. (2005), Structuring Conflict in the Arab World: Incumbents, Opponents, and Institutions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Magaloni, B. (2006), Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Miller, M. (2013), ‘Democratic Pieces: Autocratic Elections and Democratic Development since 1815’, British Journal of Political Science, published early online, December, doi: 10.1017/S0007123413000446
Mutua, M. (2008), Kenya’s Quest for Democracy: Taming Leviathan (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner).
O’Donnell, G. (1994), ‘Delegative Democracy’, Journal of Democracy, 5(1): 5569.
O’Donnell, G. (1996), ‘Illusions about Consolidation’, Journal of Democracy, 7(2): 3451.
Posada-Carbó, E. (1996), ‘Elections before Democracy: Some Considerations on Electoral History from a Comparative Approach’, in E. Posada-Carbó (ed.), Elections before Democracy: The History of Elections in Europe and Latin America (New York: St Martin’s Press): 116.
Przeworski, A. (2009), ‘Constraints and Choices: Electoral Participation in Historical Perspective’, Comparative Political Studies, 42(1): 430.
Przeworski, A. (2011), ‘Latin American Political Regimes in Comparative Perspective’, in P. Kingstone and D.J. Yashar (eds), Routledge Handbook of Latin American Politics (New York: Routledge): 542564.
Przeworski, A. (2013), ‘Political Institutions and Political Events (PIPE)’, data set, https://sites.google.com/a/nyu.edu/adam-przeworski.
Przeworski, A. (2015), ‘Acquiring the Habit of Changing Government through Elections’, Comparative Political Studies, 48(1): 101129.
Putnam, R. (1993), Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
Schedler, A. (2006) (ed.), Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner).
Schedler, A. (2015), The Politics of Uncertainty: Sustaining and Subverting Electoral Authoritarianism (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Schmitter, P. and Karl, T.L. (1991), ‘What Democracy Is . . . And Is Not’, Journal of Democracy, 2(3): 7588.
Schumpeter, J. (2010) [1943], Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy (London: Routledge).
Simpser, A. (2013), Why Governments and Parties Manipulate Elections: Theory, Practice, and Implications (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Slater, D. and Wong, J. (2013), ‘The Strength to Concede: Ruling Parties and Democratization in Developmental Asia’, Perspectives on Politics, 11(3): 717733.
Teorell, J. (2010), Determinants of Democratization: Explaining Regime Change in the World, 1972–2006 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
van de Walle, N. (2006), ‘Tipping Games: When do Opposition Parties Coalesce?’, in A. Schedler (ed.), Electoral Authoritarianism (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner): 7792.
Widner, J. (1993), The Rise of a Party-State in Kenya: From ‘Harambee!’ to ‘Nyayo!’ (Berkeley: University of California Press).

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Elections and Political Regimes

  • Jennifer Gandhi

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.