Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2014
At First Sight it Might Appear Somewhat Curious to be studying the efficacy of the liberal democratic state just at that historic moment when liberal democracy seems to have triumphed on a global scale. Yet within contemporary Europe, the nature of political community and sovereign power have been thrown into question by the resurgence of ethnic nationalism, the intensification of regional integration and global turbulence. Taken together, these forces appear to deliver a fundamental challenge to the democratic ideals which underpin liberal democratic states. This article seeks to evaluate the nature of this challenge. It invites specific consideration of the consequences of these ‘threats from above’ and ‘threats from below’ for the character of the modern state.
1 Hobsbawm, E., Nations and Nationalism since 1780, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1990, p. 175.Google Scholar
4 See Giddens, A., The Consequences of Modernity, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1990 and I. Wallerstein, Historical Capitalism, London, Verso, 1983.Google Scholar
5 See McGrew, A. G., ‘A Global Society?’, in Hall, S., Held, D., McGrew, A. (eds), Modernity and it Futures, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1992, p. 74.Google Scholar
6 For a good discussion of regionalization and regionalism, see Buzan, B., People, States and Fear, Brighton, Harvester, 1991, 2nd edition.Google Scholar
7 Held, D., ‘Democracy, the Nation‐state and the Global System’, in Held, D. (ed.), Political Theory Today, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1991, p. 202.Google Scholar
9 But see Held, D., The Foundations of Democracy, Cambridge, Polity Press, forthecoming.Google Scholar
10 See Mennel, S., ‘The Globalization of Human Society as a Very Long Term Process: Elias's Theory’, in Featherstone, M. (ed.), Global Culture, London, Sage, 1990.Google Scholar
11 The WEU is a collective defence organization of nine West European states formed in 1948. It is developing a significant military and political role, linking the EC and NATO structures. The CSCE is a grouping of 50 states (all European states in addition to the US and Canada) whose main function is to foster political stability and military security in Europe.
14 Gourevitch, P., Politics in Hard Times, New York, Cornell University Press, 1986, p. 33.Google Scholar
15 See Keohane, R., ‘The World Political Economy and the Crisis of Embedded Liberalism’, in Goldthorpe, J. H. (ed.), Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
17 Webb, C., ‘International Economic Structures, Government Interests, and International Co‐ordination of Macro‐economic Adjustment Policies’, International Organization, Vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 320n.Google Scholar
18 Garrett, G., and Lange, P., ‘Political Responses to Interdependence: What's Left for the Left?’, International Organization, Vol. 45, No. 4, p. 543.Google Scholar
21 In 1909 there were 37 IGOs and 176 INGOs. In 1989 there were nearly 300 IGOs and 4,624 INGOs.
23 Mancini, G., ‘The Making of a Constitution for Europe’, in Keohane, R. and Hoffman, S. (eds), The New European Community, Oxford, Merton Press, 1990, p. 180.Google Scholar
24 Cassese, A., Violence and Law In the Modem Age, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1988, pp. 150–1.Google Scholar
25 Capororti, F., ‘Human Rights: The Hard Road Towards Universality’, in Macdonald, R. St J. and Johnson, D. M., (eds), The Structure and Process of International Law, The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff, 1983.Google Scholar
28 Mill, J. S., ‘Considerations on Representative Government’, in Acton, H. B. (ed.), Utilitarianism, Liberty and Representative Government, London, Dent, 1951.Google Scholar
29 See, for instance, Dahl, R., A Preface to Democratic Theory, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1956.Google Scholar
31 See, for example, Schmitter, P., ‘Models of Interest Intermediation and Models of Societal Change in Western Europe’, Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 10, No. 1.Google Scholar
32 See particularly Keohane, R., After Hegemony, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
34 See Morse, E., Modernization and the Transformation of International Relations, New York, Free Press, 1976.Google Scholar
36 See Wallerstein, I., ‘The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capitalist System’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, Vol. XVI, No. 4, pp. 381–415.Google Scholar
37 Walker, R., ‘Sovereignty, Identity, Community: Reflections on the Horizons of Contemporary Political Practice’, in Walker, R. and Mendlovitz, S. H. (eds), Contending Sovereignties, London, Lynne Reiner, 1990, pp. 26–7.Google Scholar
38 Significant steps have been taken in this direction recently by Gourevitch, op. cit.; Tilly, C., Coercion, Capital and European States, AD 990–1990, Oxford, Blackwell, 1990 Google Scholar; and M. Mann, The Sources of Social Power, Vol. 1, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1986, amongst others. These works have in common a stress on integrating international conditions and processes into an analysis of the modern state. However, while their contribution is highly significant, it is primarily a starting point; for it does not fully engage international relations with political science or political sociology.
Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.