Adedokun, OA, Childress, AL, Burgess, WD (2011). Testing conceptual frameworks of nonexperimental program evaluation designs using structural equation modeling. American Journal of Evaluation 32, 480–493.
Andersen, A (2004). A Community Builder's Approach to Theory of Change: A Practical Guide to Theory Development. The Aspen Insitute: New York.
Asher, L, De Silva, M, Hanlon, C, Weiss, HA, Birhane, R, Ejigu, DA, Medhin, G, Patel, V, Fekadu, A (2016). Community-based rehabilitation intervention for people with schizophrenia in Ethiopia (RISE): study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial. Trials 17, 299.
Asher, L, Fekadu, A, Hanlon, C, Mideksa, G, Eaton, J, Patel, V, De Silva, MJ (2015). Development of a community-based rehabilitation intervention for people with schizophrenia in Ethiopia. PLoS ONE 10, e0143572.
Breuer, E, De Silva, M, Fekadu, A, Luitel, N, Murhar, V, Nakku, J, Petersen, I, Lund, C (2014). Using workshops to develop theories of change in five low and middle income countries: lessons from the programme for improving mental health care (PRIME). International Journal of Mental Health Systems 8, 15.
Breuer, E, De Silva, MJ, Shidaye, R, Petersen, I, Nakku, J, Jordans, MJ, Fekadu, A, Lund, C (2016 a). Planning and evaluating mental health services in low- and middle-income countries using theory of change. British Journal of Psychiatry 208(Suppl 56), s55–s62.
Breuer, E, Lee, L, De Silva, M, Lund, C (2016 b). Using theory of change to design and evaluate public health interventions: a systematic review. Implementation Science 11, 63.
Chibanda, D, Verhey, R, Munetsi, E, Cowan, FM, Lund, C (2016). Using a theory driven approach to develop and evaluate a complex mental health intervention: the friendship bench project in Zimbabwe. International Journal of Mental Health Systems 10, 16.
Cole, M (2003). The health action zone initiative: lessons from Plymouth. Local Government Studies 29, 99–117.
Connell, JP, Kubisch, AC (1998). Applying a theory of change approach to the evaluation of comprehensive community initiatives: progress, prospects, and problems. In New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives, Vol. 2: Theory, Measurement, and Analysis (ed. Fulbright-Andersen, K., Kubisch, A., Connell, J. P.), pp. 15–44. The Aspen Institute: USA.
Craig, P, Dieppe, P, Macintyre, S, Michie, S, Nazareth, I, Petticrew, M, Mitchie, S, Nazareth, I, Petticrew, M (2008). Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new medical research council guidance. British Medical Journal 337, a1655.
De Silva, MJ, Breuer, E, Lee, L, Asher, L, Chowdhary, N, Lund, C, Patel, V (2014). Theory of change: a theory-driven approach to enhance the medical research council's framework for complex interventions. Trials 15, 267.
De Silva, MJ, Rathod, SD, Hanlon, C, Breuer, E, Chisholm, D, Fekadu, A, Jordans, M, Kigozi, F, Petersen, I, Shidhaye, R, Medhin, G, Ssebunnya, J, Prince, M, Thornicroft, G, Tomlinson, M, Lund, C and Patel, V (2016). Evaluation of district mental healthcare plans: the PRIME consortium methodology. British Journal of Psychiatry 208(Suppl. 56), s63–s70.
Funnell, SC, Rogers, PJ (2011). Purposeful Program Theory: Effective Use of Theories of Change and Logic Models. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA.
Hanlon, C, Fekadu, A, Jordans, M, Kigozi, F, Petersen, I, Shidhaye, R, Honikman, S, Lund, C, Prince, M, Raja, S, Thornicroft, G, Tomlinson, M, Patel, V (2016). District mental healthcare plans for five low- and middle-income countries: commonalities, variations and evidence gaps. British Journal of Psychiatry 208(Suppl 56), s47–s54.
Hawe, P, Shiell, A, Riley, T (2004). Complex interventions: how ‘out of control’ can a randomised controlled trial be? British Medical Journal 328, 1561–1563.
Hernandez, M, Hodges, S (2006). Applying a theory of change approach to interagency planning in child mental health. American Journal of Community Psychology 38, 165–173.
Kane, H, Lewis, MA, Williams, PA, Kahwati, LC (2014). Using qualitative comparative analysis to understand and quantify translation and implementation. Translational Behavioral Medicine 4, 201–208.
Lund, C, Tomlinson, M, de Silva, M, Fekadu, A, Shidhaye, R, Jordans, M, Petersen, I, Bhana, A, Kigozi, F, Prince, M, Thornicroft, G, Hanlon, C, Kakuma, R, McDaid, D, Saxena, S, Chisholm, D, Raja, S, Kippen-Wood, S, Honikman, S, Fairall, L, Patel, V (2012). PRIME: a programme to reduce the treatment gap for mental disorders in five low- and middle-income countries. PLoS Medicine 9, e1001359.
Mackenzie, M (2008). Evaluating complex interventions: one size does not fit all. BMC Health Services Research 340, c185, 401–403.
Mookherji, S, LaFond, A (2013). Strategies to maximize generalization from multiple case studies: lessons from the Africa Routine Immunization System Essentials (ARISE) project. Evaluation 19, 284–303.
Patton, MQ (2008). Utilization-focused Evaluation. Sage Publications: USA.
Peters, DH (2014). The application of systems thinking in health: why use systems thinking? Health Research Policy and Systems 12, 51.
Prinsen, G, Nijhof, S (2015). Between logframes and theory of change: reviewing debates and a practical experience. Development in Practice 25, 234–246.
Sullivan, H, Barnes, M, Matka, E (2002). Building collaborative capacity through ‘theories of change’: early lessons from the evaluation of health action zones in England. Evaluation 8, 205–226.
Sullivan, H, Stewart, M (2006). Who owns the theory of change? Evaluation 12, 179–199.
Vogel, I (2012). Review of the Use of ‘Theory of Change’ in International Development. Department for International Development (DFID): UK.