Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T06:01:19.583Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Trial and Error—A Critique of the New German Draft Code for a Genuine Corporate Criminal Liability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Markus Rübenstahl  and
Christian Brauns

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The following article aims to analyze the first German draft bill concerning a corporate criminal code. The draft bill, recently introduced by the federal state of Nordrhein-Westfalen, led to a transformation of a theoretical academic discussion towards a specific proposal on potential future legislation. Firstly, the article introduces underlying reasons for the draft based on deficiencies of the current legislation. Current regulations solely provide corporate administrative responsibility for criminal offenses committed by a corporation's management (involving huge fines). Subsequently, the article reviews the content of the draft, specifically the multiplicity of proposed criminal and other penalties. The authors intend to demonstrate that the draft is often too vague or—especially with regard to penalties—simply over the top. The applicable sanctions – which may be combined- would lead to a more draconic punishment than in any other comparable legal system. Furthermore, regarding the principles of due process and strict legality the proposed procedural rules of the draft are not satisfying. After all, the proposed procedural measures to safeguard the proceedings and the rules on representation and defense counsel are deficient.

Type
Developments
Information
German Law Journal , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , 01 September 2015 , pp. 871 - 886
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 by German Law Journal GbR 

References

1 See Gesetzesentwurf eines Verbandsstrafgesetzbuchs [VerbStGB-E] [Corporate Criminal Code], presented in 2013, Bundsrat Drucksachen [BR] 1/13 (Ger.), https://dicoev.de/fileadmin/PDF/PDF_Intranet_2013/Unternehmensstrafrecht/2013-10-15_Entwurf_zum_Unternehmensstrafrecht.pdf [hereinafter VerbStGB-E].Google Scholar

2 Löffelmann, Der Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Einführung der strafrechtlichen Verantwortlichkeit von Unternehmen und sonstigen Verbänden, JR 2014, 185 (186), available at http://www.nrw.de/landesregierung/justizministerkonferenz-begruesst-die-gesetzesinitiative-von-nrw-zum-unternehmensstrafrecht-15084/.Google Scholar

3 Rübenstahl & Tsambikakis, , Neues Unternehmensstrafrecht: Der NRW-Gesetzentwurf zur Einführung der strafrechtlichen, 7/2014 ZWH (2014) 8; Kirsch, Völkerstrafrechtliche Risiken unternehmerischer Tätigkeit, 6/2014, NZWiSt 212 (2014); Kindler, Unternehmensstrafrecht und individuelle sanktionsrechtliche Haftungsrisiken, 4/2014 (2014), 134. In detail about dogmatic concerns, see Hoven, Der nordrhein-westfälische Entwurf eines Verbandsstrafgesetzbuchs – Eine kritische Betrachtung von Begründungsmodell und Voraussetzungen der Straftatbestände, ZIS 19 (2014), http://www.zis-online.com/dat/artikel/2014_1_790.pdf.Google Scholar

4 See Rübenstahl, Markus, Contra: Deutschland braucht kein (solches) Unternehmensstrafrecht, 1/14 ZRFC 26 (2014), available at http://www.compliancedigital.de/ce/contra-deutschland-braucht-kein-solches-unternehmensstrafrecht/detail.html.Google Scholar

5 VerbStGB-E at 1.Google Scholar

6 Kutschaty, , Deutschland braucht ein Unternehmensstrafrecht, 3/2013 ZRP 74, 75 (2013).Google Scholar

7 Rübenstahl, supra note 4, at 26; Haubner, Der Gesetzentwurf Nordrhein-Westfalens zur Einführung eines Unternehmensstrafrechts, 24/2014 DB 1358 (2014).Google Scholar

8 Even the negligent constitution of a mere administrative offense also by omission shall be sufficient.Google Scholar

9 See Rübenstahl, , supra note 4, at 26.Google Scholar

10 See Kutschaty, , supra note 6, at 75.Google Scholar

11 See id. Google Scholar

12 Richtlinien für das Strafverfahren und das Bußgeldverfahren [RiStBV] [Rules of Action for Criminal Proceedings], Sept. 2014, No. 180a (4) (Ger.) available at http://www.verwaltungsvorschriften-im-internet.de/bsvwvbund_01011977_420821R5902002.htm.Google Scholar

13 See Kutschaty, , supra note 6, at 75.Google Scholar

14 See Rübenstahl, , supra note 4, at 27.Google Scholar

15 See Rübenstahl, , supra note 4, at 26, 27.Google Scholar

16 VerbStGB-E at 2.Google Scholar

17 See Rübenstahl, & Tsambikakis, , supra note 3, at 8–9.Google Scholar

18 Constitutional requirement in accordance with Arts. 1 & 20 III. See Grundesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland [Grundegesetz] [gg] [basic law], May 23, 1949, BGBl. I, arts. 1, 20 III.Google Scholar

19 VerbStGB-E at 29.Google Scholar

20 Bundesverfassungsgericht, [BVerfGE] [Federal Constitutional Court], Oct. 25, 1996, Case No. II BvR 506/34 paras. 20, 323, 336.Google Scholar

21 VerbStGB-E § 4 at 9.Google Scholar

22 See Rübenstahl, , supra note 4, at 26–27.Google Scholar

23 In accordance with Art. 20 III GG.Google Scholar

24 See Bundesgesetzblatt, , Teil I [BGBl. I] at 1738; Witte & Wagner, Die Gesetzesinitiative Nordrhein-Westfalens zur Einführung eines Unternehmensstrafrechts, 12/2014 BB 643 (2014).Google Scholar

25 See Rübenstahl, , supra note 4, at 26.Google Scholar

26 VerbStGB-E at 2 (containing further references).Google Scholar

27 See Rübenstahl, , supra note 4, at 26, 28.Google Scholar

28 D.Lgs. 231/2001; see Rübenstahl, Strafrechtliche Unternehmenshaftung in Italian, 8/2012 RIW 505, 508 (2012).Google Scholar

29 See Rübenstahl, & Skoupil, , Anforderungen der US-Behörden an Compliance-Programme nach dem FCPA und deren Auswirkung auf die Strafverfolgung von Unternehmen, 6/2013 209 (2013).Google Scholar

30 VerbStGB-E § 1 at 7–8.Google Scholar

31 See Rübenstahl, , supra note 4; Rübenstahl, supra note 28; Rübenstahl, Der Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) der USA Part 1, 11/2012, NZWiSt 2012; see also Rübenstahl, Der Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) der USA Part 2, 1/2013, NZWiSt 2013, 13.Google Scholar

32 Witte, & Wagner, , supra note 24, at 643–44.Google Scholar

33 See Rübenstahl, , supra note 4, at 26, 28.Google Scholar

34 In particular, see Abgabenordnung [AO] [Fiscal Code], Oct. 1, 2002, Bundesgesetzblatt, Teil I. [BGBl. I] §§ 51, 61– 63; Strafgesetzbuch [StGB] [Penal Code] § 266.Google Scholar

35 See Ordnungswidrigkeitsgesetz [OWiG] [Administrative Offenses Act], Feb. 19, 1987, [juris GmbH] § 130.Google Scholar

36 Witte, & Wagner, , supra note 24, at 643–44; VerbStGB-E § 1.Google Scholar

37 Hoven, Wimmer Schwarz, & Schumann, , Der nordrhein-westfälische Entwurf eines Verbandsstrafegesetzes – Kritische Anmerkungen aus Wissenschaft un Praxis Teil 1, 5/2014 NZWiSt 161, 163 (2014).Google Scholar

38 Correctly criticizing the fact, that offenses against the association—for example, embezzlement—shall be “related to the association” in that sense. Hoven, Wimmer, Schwarz, & Schumann, supra note 38, at 161, 163– 164.Google Scholar

39 VerbStGB-E § 1(2) at 7.Google Scholar

40 VerbStGB-E § 1(3)(d) at 8.Google Scholar

41 VerbStGB-E § 1(3); see OWiG § 30 I.Google Scholar

42 Rübenstahl, supra note 4, at 26, 28.Google Scholar

43 VerbStGB-E § 1(4) at 8; see OWiG § 30(2)(a).Google Scholar

44 VerbStGB-E at 45.Google Scholar

45 See Rübenstahl, , supra note 4, at 26, 29.Google Scholar

46 In the style of OWiG § 130.Google Scholar

47 The draft and its explanation do not explain whether negligently infringement shall be attributable when only intentional infringement is punishable for the individual. See VerbStGB-E at 46.Google Scholar

48 VerbStGB-E at 36, 45.Google Scholar

49 See Rübenstahl, , supra note 4, at 26, 29.Google Scholar

50 VerbStGB-E § 4(1) at 9.Google Scholar

51 VerbStGB-E § 4(2) at 9.Google Scholar

52 VerbStGB-E § 3(1) at 8; StGB § 73.Google Scholar

53 VerbStGB-E at 57.Google Scholar

54 VerbStGB-E at 58.Google Scholar

55 Cramer, & Pananis, , Kartellrecht GWB, § 81 marg, 59 (2009).Google Scholar

56 VerbStGB-E § 6(5).Google Scholar

57 See Rübenstahl, , supra note 4, at 26, 30.Google Scholar

58 Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerfGE] [Federal Constitutional Court], July 16, 1969, Case No. II BvL 2/69 at paras. 18, 27, 33.Google Scholar

59 As well in antitrust law. See Cramer & Pananis, supra note 56.Google Scholar

60 Rübenstahl, supra note 4, at 26, 30; Görtz, Unternehmensstrafrecht: Entwurf eines Verbandstrafgesetzbuchs, 1/2014, WiJ 7 (2014), available at www.wi-j.de/index.php/de/wij/aktuelle-ausgabe/item/244-unternehmensstrafrecht-entwurf-eines-verbandsstrafgesetzbuchs.Google Scholar

61 VerbStGB-E § 3(1) at 8; in detail about difficulties of the perpetration of an offense, see Mitsch, Täterschaft & Teilnahme bei der Verbandsstraftat, 1/2014 NZWiSt 1, 4 (2014).Google Scholar

62 Bundesgerichtshof [BGH] [Federal Court of Justice], Mar. 21, 2002, Case No. 5 StR 138/01, para. 477.Google Scholar

63 Rübenstahl, Anwaltskommentar-StGB, § 73 marg. 61a-61g (2014).Google Scholar

64 Görtz, supra note 61, at 3, 4.Google Scholar

65 Rübenstahl, supra note 4, at 26, 31.Google Scholar

66 See Rübenstahl, , supra note 28, at 505; Rübenstahl & Boerger, Der Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) der USA Part 4, 8/2013 NZStWi 281 (2013); see also Rübenstahl & Boerger, Der Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) der USA Part 5, 10/2013 NZStWi 267 (2013); Rübenstahl & Skoupil, supra note 29, at 209.Google Scholar

67 VerbStGB-E § 2(4) at 8; see StGB § 261(5); VerbStGB-E at 50.Google Scholar

68 VerbStGB-E § 2(4) at 8.Google Scholar

69 Rübenstahl, supra note 4, at 26, 31. Also in favor of a rule similar to section 30(2)(a) OWiG, see Görtz, supra note 60, at 8.Google Scholar

70 See StGB § 46a II; VerbStGB-E § 5(1) at 9; Hein, Verbandsstrafgesetzbuch (VerbStrG-E) – Bietet der Entwurf Anreize zur Vermeidung von Wirtschafskriminalität in Unternehmen?, 2/2014 CCZ 75, 77 (2014) (criticizing the use the draft makes often termed “damage”).Google Scholar

71 VerbStGB-E § 5 at 9–10.Google Scholar

72 Rübenstahl & Skoupil, , supra note 29, at 209; Görtz, supra note 61.Google Scholar

73 Rübenstahl & Skoupil, , supra note 29, at 209; Rübenstahl, supra note 4, at 32.Google Scholar

74 Rübenstahl, supra note 4, at 26, 32.Google Scholar

75 See Grundgesetz [GG] [Basic Law] arts. 2 I & 20 III.Google Scholar

76 Hein, , supra note 70, at 75, 78.Google Scholar

77 VerbStGB-E §§ 7–8 at 11.Google Scholar

78 Rübenstahl, supra note 4, at 26, 32.Google Scholar

79 VerbStGB-E at 26.Google Scholar

80 See Görtz, supra note 61.Google Scholar

81 VerbStGB-E §§ 10–11 at 12.Google Scholar

82 See Rübenstahl, , supra note 4, at 26, 33.Google Scholar

83 See VerbStGB-E § 13(1) at 13; for more details, see VerbStGB-E §§ 13(3), 15–16, 21–22 at 13–14, 17.Google Scholar

84 VerbStGB-E § 15(3) at 14.Google Scholar

85 VerbStGB-E § 14(1) at 13.Google Scholar

86 VerbStGB-E § 14(2) at 13.Google Scholar

87 See Rübenstahl, & Tsambikakis, supra note 3, at 8, 11.Google Scholar

88 Hoven, et al., supra note 38, at 210.Google Scholar

89 VerbStGB-E § 14(3) at 13–14.Google Scholar

90 VerbStGB-E § 14(2) at 13.Google Scholar

91 VerbStGB-E § 14(3) at 13–14.Google Scholar

92 See Rübenstahl, , supra note 4, at 26, 33.Google Scholar

93 See Rübenstahl, & Tsambikakis, , supra note 3, at 8, 12.Google Scholar

94 See StGB § 283(1)(1).Google Scholar

95 See Rübenstahl, , supra note 4, at 26, 33.Google Scholar

96 See Rübenstahl, , supra note 4, at 26, 33.Google Scholar

97 See VerbStGB-E §§ 13(1)&(3) at 13; StPO § 111(b); StGB at § 73.Google Scholar

98 Not targets of a criminal investigation. See Hoven et al., supra note 38, at 201, 204, 206.Google Scholar

99 VerbStGB-E § 17(1) at 15.Google Scholar

100 See Rübenstahl, & Tsambikakis, , supra note 3, at 8, 12.Google Scholar

101 VerbStGB-E § 18(1) at 15.Google Scholar

102 StPO § 146.Google Scholar

103 VerbStGB-E § 18(2) at 15.Google Scholar

104 VerbStGB-E at 77.Google Scholar

105 See Rübenstahl, , supra note 4, at 26, 33.Google Scholar

106 See Rübenstahl, & Tsambikakis, , supra note 3, at 8, 12.Google Scholar

107 VerbStGB-E § 19(1) at 15–16.Google Scholar

108 See Rübenstahl, , supra note 4, at 26, 33; Hoven et al., supra note 38, at 201, 205.Google Scholar

109 Grundegesetz [GG] [Basic Law] arts. 2(1) & 20(3).Google Scholar

110 Görtz, supra note 61, at 10.Google Scholar

111 See Rübenstahl, , supra note 4, at 26, 34.Google Scholar