Ignacio de la Rasilla del Moral, Alicia a través del espejo o apuntes para una teoría neoconservadora del Derecho internacional Revue Quebecoise de Droit International, forthcoming (2007).
Jeremy A. Rabkin, The Case For Sovereignty: Why The World Should Welcome American Independence (2004).
Jeremy A. Rabkin, Law Without Nations, Why Constitutional Government Requires Sovereign States (2007).
Note Kofi Annan's remark “the language of global society is international law”, cited in Rabkin (note 3), 114.
“But a number of nations have viewed themselves as, in some way, a new Israel- distinctive, luminous, faithful to some special destiny” Rabkin (note 6), 11. This remark concludes two pages of text in which the author does not spare his readers of interpretations of the Hebrew bible according to which the Babel's resulting “division of mankind was, in some way, necessary or providential” Rabkin (note 4), p.8-10.
Andrew Moravcsik The Threat from Europe: Review of Jeremy A. Rabkin's The Case for Sovereignty, Prospect 69, 69 (April, 2006).
Both successive books evidenced to be addressed to appeal an American audience already sympathetic with its underlying postulates. Unadvised foreigners, but specially Europeans, are likely to soon find themselves forcing to adopt a sociological external perspective in view of its ultra-nationalistic tone.
171 states of the world -including Russia, China and India- have already ratified the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, http://unfccc.int/2860.php (last acceded 16th May, 2007) Note, furthermore, the developments occurred in the June 2007 G8 Summit concerning this issue.
Escorihuela, Alejandro Lorite, Cultural Relativism the American Way: The Nationalist School of International Law in the United States 5 Global Jurist Issue 1, Frontiers, 1-166,
John C Yoo The Powers Of War And Peace: The Constitution And Foreign Affairs After 9/11(2005).
“Many scholars thus seem to embrace post-modernism with the exuberance of adolescents, discovering that sex is a lot more appealing and lot more available than they had realised as children,” Rabkin (note 2), 15.
Jack Goldsmith, & Eric A. Posner The Limits of International Law (2005), Glennon, Michael
Platonism, Adaptivism, and Illusion in UN Reform 6 Chicago Journal of International Law, (2006) or Yoo, John C, Force Rules: UN Reform and Intervention 6 Chicago Journal of International Law, (2006) among other referential authors.
Bianchi, Andrea, International Law and US Courts: The Myth of Lohengrin Revisited 15 European Journal Of International Law,
Krisch, Nico and Kingsbury, Benedict
Introduction; Global Governance and Global Administrative Law in the International Order 17 European Journal Of International Law, 1, pp. 1–15 (2006).
De La Rasilla Del Moral (Note 1).
Yoo, John, Using Force, 71 U. Chi. L. Rev.
For a good sample of the debate, see the “Agora: Is the Nature of the International Law System Changing”, 8 Austrian Review Of International And European Law, (2003).
Lorite Escorihuela (note 33).
de la Rasilla del Moral (note 1). See also de la Rasilla del Moral, “All Roads Lead to Rome or the Liberal Cosmopolitan Agenda as a Blueprint for a Neo-conservative Legal Order” in global jurist (advances), forthcoming (2007) International Law.
It should be noted that I am not attempting to trace with this remark a parallelism with what mutatis mutandi David Kennedy has defined as the “dark sides, unjustified biases and blind spots” of humanitarian thinking. See David Kennedy, El Lado Oscuro De La Virtud, (trans. prel. essay by Francisco J Contreras and Ignacio de la Rasilla) 2007.
Franck, Thomas M., “Is Anything “Left” in International Law?”, 1 Unbound: Harvard Journal Of The Legal Left 59, 61 (2005).
Marks, Susan “International Judicial Activism and the Commodity-Form Theory of International Law” European Journal Of International Law, Vol. 18, 199 (2007).
This framework of analysis was highly influenced by Vagts, Detlev, F., Hegemonic International Law in 95 Am J Int'l L 843 (2001). Among the different symposia see American-European Dialogue: Different Perceptions of International Law in Zeitschrift Für Ausländisches Öffentliches Recht Und Völkerrecht, 64/2, 2004; and the Symposium: The US and International Law in European Journal Of International Law, Vol. 15, No. 4, 2004.
Reisman, Michael M., The Past and Future of the Claim of Pre-Emptive Self-Defense 100 Am. J. Int'l L.
Friedrichs, Jörg, Defining the International Public Enemy: The Political Struggle behind the Legal Debate on International Terrorism 19 Leiden Journal Of International Law,
For a reaction see: Thienel, Tobias, The Admissibility of Evidence Obtained by Torture under International Law European Journal Of International Law Vol. 17,367 (2006).
“Rabkin's is a serious statement of all that cosmopolitanism and post-modern humanism must overcome in their quest for a more just global order”, Paul Carrese, Review of Law Without Nations 16 Law And Politics Book Review, 182 (February 2006), http://www.bsos.umd.edu/gvpt/lpbr/subpages/reviews/rabkin0206.htm (last acceded, 14th May, 2007) Prof. Carrese's review constitutes a balance attempt to analyse the originalist constitutional approach of the book from a his “own scholarship” which “lies closer to Rabkin's perspective of originalism” insofar as “Rabkin elaborates the minority view on law and government among American and European academics” by stressing and engaging with the analysis of the libertarian philosophical foundations of the book.
In justifying US’ unilateralism through the exemplification of the absolute lack of faith that one should posed in the UN in light e.g. of Rwanda's genocide, “The UN official responsible for withdrawing the peacekeepers, Kofi Annan, was later promoted to secretary-general, and was subsequently awarded a Nobel Peace Prize – for peacekeeping! Rabkin (note 2), 84.
e.g. AI's campaign against capital punishment in the US vs withholding of comment about mass murder in Cambodia, Rabkin (note 4), 176.
“Is the perfect motto for advocates and institutions that take pride in answering to no one” Rabkin (note 4), 188.
“That could mean that “fundamental elements of American domestic law would, in effect, be made in international forums or in other countries and then simply appropriated by American judges” Rabkin (note 4), 23.
The ICC, perhaps the single front to which more references are to be found in both books, is one of the black beasts of NIL. Rabkin's attacks on the ICC do not stop in subtitles: “Europeans are drawn to relativizing abstractions. For Germans, the ICC promises to “overcome the past,” by licensing German judges to try Americans and Israelis for war crimes”. Note, however, that such a remark is not an isolated passage in one of the books under review or even a discreet footnote, but it makes part of the abstract itself of Jeremy Rabkin, World Apart on International Justice 15 Leiden Journal Of International Law, 835 (2002).