Hostname: page-component-546b4f848f-hhr79 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-05-30T09:17:42.473Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false

German Socially Responsible Investment: Barriers and Opportunities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019


HTML view is not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In socially responsible investment terms, Germany is a contradiction. The country is considered by many as one of the pioneers of post-war environmentalism and social reform. Yet, German financial institutions are amongst the European laggards in adopting environmentally and socially informed approaches to investment. This article identifies a variety of legal, institutional and attitudinal factors which hinder the growth of the German SRI market. Its paltry size does not reflect evidence of any specific disinterest among German investors in social and environmental issues. Rather, it arises from a combination of structural impediments, particularly the institutional arrangements for German pension schemes that hinder their participation in financial markets, regulations which encourage conservative investments, and investors' preference for low-risk assets and avoidance of shareholder activism. Legal and institutional reforms over the past decade have in theory created better opportunities for SRI in Germany, although they have yet to engender significant changes in the market.

Copyright © 2011 by German Law Journal GbR 


1 See, e.g., M. O'Brien Hylton, 'Socially Responsible’ Investing: Doing Good Versus Doing Well in an Inefficient Market, 42 Am. U. L. REV. 1 (1992) 1; Thornton, Rosy, Ethical Investments: A Case of Disjointed Thinking, 67 Cambridge L. J. 396, 419 (2008). Also, scholarship on German or European SRI is sometimes not available in English: see, e.g., Jan Scharlau, Socially Responsible Investment: Die deutschen und europarechtlichen Rahmenbedingungen (2009).Google Scholar

2 E.g., Juravle, Carmen & Lewis, Alan, Identifying Impediments to SRI in Europe: A Review of the Practitioner and Academic Literature, 17 Bus. Ethics 285 (2008); Richardson, Benjamin J., Socially Responsible Investment Law: Regulating the Unseen Polluters (2008).Google Scholar

3 Lazonick, William & O'Sullivan, Mary, Maximising Shareholder Value: A New Ideology for Corporate Governance, 29 Econ & Soc. 13 (2000).Google Scholar

4 For insights into this more radical, comprehensive agenda of reform, see, e.g., Brown, Lester R., Eco-Economy: Building an Economy for the Earth (2001); Daly, Herman E. & Cobb, John, For the Common Good: Redirecting the Economy Towards Community, the Environment and a Sustainable Future (1990); Jacobs, Michael, Green Economy: Environment, Sustainable Development and the Politics of the Future (1993).Google Scholar

5 For an introduction to the goals and means of SRI, see Hung-Gay, Fung, Sheryl Law & Jof Yau, Socially Responsible Investment in a Global Environment (2010); Sustainable Investing: The Art of Long Term Performance (Cary Krosinsky & Nick Robins eds., 2008); Responsible Investing in Times of Turmoil: The Future of SRI (W. Vandekerckhove, et. al., eds., 2011).Google Scholar

6 See News Release: Why is Biodiversity in Crisis?, IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, (3 September 2010), (last accessed 1 January 2011) (reporting that “the escalating extinction crisis shows that the diversity of nature cannot support the current pressure that humanity is placing on the planet”); U.N. Env't Programme, Global Environment Outlook GEO-4: Environment for Development 6 (2007); Global Environment Outlook, U.N. Env't Programme, (last accessed 1 January 2011).Google Scholar

7 Clak, Gordon & Wojcik, Darius, The Geography of Finance: Corporate Governance in the Global Marketplace (2007).Google Scholar

8 See Shiller, Robert J., Irrational Exuberance (2000); Brogle, John, The Battle for the Soul of Capitalism (2005); Jameson, Frederic, Culture and Finance Capitalism, 24 Crit. Inq. 246 (1997).Google Scholar

9 Rivoli, Pietra, Making a Difference or Making a Statement? Finance Research and Socially Responsible Investment, 13 Bus. Ethics Q. 271 (2003).Google Scholar

10 Triolo, Paola, Martin Palmer & Steve Waygood, A Capital Solution: Faith, Finance and Concern for a Living Planet (2000).Google Scholar

11 United Nations Environment Programme-Finance Initiative (UNEPFI), The Materiality of Social, Environmental and Corporate Governance Issues in Equity Pricing (2004).Google Scholar

12 E.g., US Social Investment Forum, Socially Responsible Investing Assets in US Top $3 Trillion; Nearly 1 Out of Every 8 Dollars under Professional Management, Press release (9 November 2010), Scholar

13 US Social Investment Forum, 2005 Report on Socially Responsible Investing Trends in the United States: A10-Year Review 9 (2006). A survey of more than 600 SRI funds, by the Natural Capital Institute, found that over 90 percent of Fortune 500 index companies are included in at least one SRI portfolio: Paul Hawken, Socially Responsible Investing (2004).Google Scholar

14 Schepers, Donald & Sethi, S. Prakash, Do Socially Responsible Funds Actually Deliver What they Promise? Bridging the Gap Between the Promise and Performance of Socially Responsible Funds, 108 Bus. & Soc. Rev. 11 (2003).Google Scholar

15 Fung, Hung-Gay, Sheryl A. Law & Jot Lau, Socially Responsible Investment in a Global Environment 46 (2010).Google Scholar

16 German Councilfor Sustainable Development, Towards a German Sustainability Code (December 2010), Scholar

17 Id., 1.Google Scholar

18 Richardson, , supra note 2, at 89-101.Google Scholar

19 See (last accessed 1 January 2011).Google Scholar

20 See (last accessed 1 January 2011).Google Scholar

21 Rivoli, , supra note 9.Google Scholar

22 Wallace Davidson, Dan Worell & El-Jelly, Abuzar, Influencing Managers to Change Unpopular Corporate Behavior through Boycotts and Divestitures, 34 Bus. & Soc. 171 (1995).Google Scholar

23 Jeucken, Marcel, Sustainable Finance and Banking: The Financial Sector and the Future of the Planet (2001); Thompson, Paul, Bank Lending and the Environment: Policies and Opportunities, 16 Int'l J. Bank Mark. 243 (1998).Google Scholar

24 Richardson, Benjamin J., Financing Sustainability: The New Transnational Governance of Socially Responsible Investment, 17 Ybk Int'l Env'tl L. 73 (2007).Google Scholar

25 Id., 73.Google Scholar

26 Shaw, Edward, Financial Deepening in Economic Development (1975); Singh, Ajit, Financial Liberalisation, Stockmarkets and Economic Development, 107 Econ. J. 771 (1997).Google Scholar

27 E.g., UK's Occupational Pension Schemes (Investment) Regulations, 2005: cl. 2(3)(b)(vi)-(3)(c); Australia's Corporations Act, 2001 (Cth), para. 1013D(1)(I); France's Projet de loi sur l'épargne salariale (7 February 2001). No. 2001-152, Arts. 21, 23.Google Scholar

28 Securities Exchange Commission, Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Proxy Voting Records by Registered Management Investment Companies (31 January 2003), 17 CFR Parts 239, 249, 270, & 274; Canadian Securities Administrators, National Instrument 81-106 Investment Fund Continuous Disclosure and Companion Policy 81-106CP (2005).Google Scholar

29 Known as the Green Project Directive, introduced in 1995: the scheme was amended in 2002 and 2005: Regeling groenprojecten buitenland, Staatscourant 1 (2 January 2002 31; Regeling groenprojecten, Staatscourant 131 (11 July 2005): 13; see further Marcel Jeucken, Sustainable Finance and Banking: The Financial Sector and the Future of the Planet 92-94 (2001).Google Scholar

30 Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, 1980, Pub. L. No. 96-510; but the legislation was amended in 1996 to limit lenders’ potential liability: Olaf de S. Domis, New Law Finally Limits Environmental Liability, 161 Am. Banker 3 (1996).Google Scholar

31 Case, David, Changing Corporate Behavior through Environmental Management Systems, 31 William & Mary Env'tl L. & Pol. Rev. 7 (2006); Eric W. Orts, Reflexive Environmental Law, 89 Nw. U.L. Rev. 1127 (1995).Google Scholar

32 Vlaanderen, Netwerk, Belgium Bans Investments in Cluster Munitions, Press release (2 March 2007), (last accessed 1 January 2011).Google Scholar

33 UNEPFI Asset Management Working Group and UK Social Investment Forum, Responsible Investment in Focus: How Leading Public Pension Funds are Meeting the Challenge (2007),Google Scholar

34 Williams, Cynthia, Corporate Social Responsibility in an Era of Economic Globalization, 35 U. Cal. Davis L. Rev. 705, 731 (2002).Google Scholar

35 See Leonard, Geoffrey & Duerksen, Christopher, Environmental Regulation and the Location of Industry: An International Perspective, 15 Colum. J. World Bus. 52 (1980); Wilson, John, Capital Mobility and Environmental Standards: Is there a Theoretical Basis for a Race to the Bottom? in Fair Trade and Harmonization: Economic Analysis, Vol. 1, 393 (Jagdish Bhagwati & Robert E. Hudec eds., 1996).Google Scholar

36 See Giovanoli, Mario, A New Architecture for the Global Financial Market: An Outline of Legal Issues, in International Monetary Law: Issues for the New Millennium 3 (Mario Giovanoli ed., 2000).Google Scholar

37 See generally Carlberg, Michael, International Economic Policy Coordination (2005); Kern Alexander, Rahul Dhumale & Eatwell, John, Global Governance of Financial Systems (2006).Google Scholar

38 Presti, Vincent, Barings Bar None: The Financial Service Agreement of the GATS and its Potential Impact on Derivatives Trading, 21 Maryland J. Int'l L. & Trade 145 (1997). The legal text of the GATS, including the Annex on Financial Services and the Understanding on Commitments in Financial Services, are part of the Final Act Embodying the Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations: see (last accessed 1 January 2011).Google Scholar

39 The Agreement entered into force on 1 March 1999. See further Aaditya Mattoo, Financial Services and the WTO: Liberalization in the Developing and Transition Economies (1998).Google Scholar

40 By way of introduction, see European Commission, Institutional Arrangements for the Regulation and Supervision of the Financial Sector (2000).Google Scholar

41 Presidency Conclusions, Lisbon European Council, March 23-24, 2000, 3 Eur. U. Bull.7 (2000).Google Scholar

42 The current version is Art. 11, Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union, (2008) O.J. C 115/47, which states: “Environmental protection requirements must be integrated into the definition and implementation of the Union policies and activities, in particular with a view to promoting sustainable development.” The principle of integration also appears in a weaker form in the Single European Act, in Art.130R(2) EC: “Environmental protection requirements shall be a component of the Community's other policies.” On the lack of consistency between the European Treaty level and the level of secondary law in the company and business law area, see Beate Sjafell, Towards a Sustainable European Company Law (2009).Google Scholar

43 Pehle, Heinrich, Germany: Domestic Obstacles to an International Forerunner, in European Environmental Policy: The Pioneers 161 (Michael S. Andersen & Duncan Liefferink eds., 1997).Google Scholar

44 Bauklah, Anja & Roose, Jocken, The Environmental Movement and Environmental Concern in Contemporary Germany, in The Culture of German Environmentalism: Anxieties, Visions and Realities 81 (Axel Goodbody ed., 2002).Google Scholar

45 See Federal Returning Officer, Final Result of the Election to the German Bundestag 2009, (last accessed 1 January 2011).Google Scholar

46 These laws include Germany's Renewable Energy Sources Act, 2004 (Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetz EEG) and Environmental Damage Act, 2007 (UShadG).Google Scholar

48 Joanna Rachocka, Socially Responsible Investment in Europe 16 (2007).Google Scholar

49 The first SRI retail fund in the US was probably the Pax World Fund, established in 1971.Google Scholar

50 See (last accessed 1 January 2011).Google Scholar

51 Schaefer, Henry, Ethical Investment of German Non-profit Organizations – Conceptual Outline and Empirical Results, 13 Bus. Ethics: Euro. Rev. 269, 270 (2004).Google Scholar

52 See (last accessed 1 January 2011).Google Scholar

53 Geldanlagen, Forum Nachhaltige, Marktbericht Nachhaltige Geldanlagen 2010: Deutschland, Österreich und die Schweiz 19 (2010).Google Scholar

55 Signatories to the Principles for Responsible Investment, (last accessed 1 January 2011).Google Scholar

56 Eurosif, , European SRI Study 201 (2010).Google Scholar

57 Id., 8.Google Scholar

58 Id., 9.Google Scholar

59 The SRI market share in the UK is surprisingly large. However, the Eurosif study notes that of the total £938.9 billion SRI assets, compared to the total managed investment assets in the UK worth £3.4 trillion, most comprised “broad” SRI (worth £884.2 billion): id., 53.Google Scholar

60 Id., 16, 42, 43, 54.Google Scholar

61 Id., 36.Google Scholar

62 Schaefer, , supra note 51, 283.Google Scholar

63 Eurosif, , supra note 56, at 17, 51. Interestingly, though, investment in equities has dropped from 50 percent in 2008 to 33 percent in 2010 on the European level, making bonds the favored asset (from 39 percent in 2008 to 53 percent in 2010); id., 7.Google Scholar

64 US Social Investment Forum, 2010 Report Socially Responsible Investing Trends in the United States 40-56 (2010).Google Scholar

65 Id., 35.Google Scholar

66 Geldanlagen, Forum Nachhaltige, Marktbericht nachhaltige Geldanlagen 2010 - Deutschland, Oesterreich und die Schweiz 21 (2010).Google Scholar

67 Eurosif, , supra note 56, 7.Google Scholar

68 Schaefer, Henry, Wie nachhaltig ist die Kreditanlage in Deutschland? 6 (2005), (last accessed 1 January 2011).Google Scholar

69 Fortis Investments & Federal Environmental Ministry of Germany, Occupational pensions and sustainable investments in Germany 5 (2008).Google Scholar

70 Axel H. Boersch-Supan & Christina B. Wilke, Reforming the German Public Pension System 3 (2005). (last accessed 1 January 2011).Google Scholar

71 Riedel, Silke & Schneeweiss, Antje, Chancen und Entwicklungsmoeglichkeiten fuer ein Aktives Aktionaerstum in Deutschland – eine Machbarkeitsstudie 12 (2008).Google Scholar

72 Boersch-Supan & Wilke, , supra note 70, 8.Google Scholar

73 Id., 16.Google Scholar

74 Scharlau, , supra note 1, 112.Google Scholar

75 Law on the Reform of the pay-as-you-go-Pension System (Gesetz zur Reform der gesetzlichen Rentenversicherung und zur Foerderung eines kapitalgedeckten Altersvorsorgevermoegens (AVmG)), June 29 2001, (2001) BGBl. 11310.Google Scholar

76 The PAYG system has been shrinking, caused by the demographic shift of an ageing population with fewer workers to finance the pensions of a growing number of recipients: Boersch-Supan & Wilke, supra note 70, 4.Google Scholar

77 Bundesministerium fuer Arbeit und Soziales, Entwicklung der Riester-Rente (2010), Scholar

78 Schaefer, , supra note 68, 2.Google Scholar

79 Rottmann, Stephan, Erfolgreich investieren in gruene Geldanlagen 46-47 (2009).Google Scholar

80 Schwietering, Timo, Treuhaendische Verantwortung und Ethisches Investment - Chancen und Zwaenge am deutschen Pensionskassenmarkt 21 (LLB dissertation, Universitaet Bayreuth, 2007).Google Scholar

81 Id., 22.Google Scholar

83 Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband, Unterstüetzungskasse: Frei in der Vermöegensanlage (2008), (last accessed 1 January 2011).Google Scholar

84 To be eligible for government subsidies, investment vehicles have to guarantee payment of a life annuity payable from the date of retirement; they must not provide for lump-sum disbursements: Boersch-Supan & Wilke, supra note 70, 11.Google Scholar

85 Scharlau, , supra note 1, 113.Google Scholar

86 Deringer, Freshfields Bruckhaus, A Legal Framework for the Integration of Environmental, Social and Governance Issues into Institutional Investment (2005).Google Scholar

87 Langbein, John, Questioning the Trust Law Duty of Loyalty: Sole Interest or Best Interest? 114 Yale L. J. 929 (2005).Google Scholar

88 Cowan v Scargill [1985] 1 Ch. 270; Martin v. City of Edinburgh District Council [1988] SLT 329; Bishop of Oxford v. Church Commissioners for England [1992] 1 WLR 1241.Google Scholar

89 Discussed further in Richardson, Benjamin J., Do the Fiduciary Duties of Pension Funds Hinder Socially Responsible Investment? 22(2) Bank. & Fin. L. Rev. 145 (2007).Google Scholar

90 Directive 2003/41/EC of June 3, 2003, O.J. L. 235/10.Google Scholar

91 Id., Art. 12.Google Scholar

92 European Parliament, Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, Draft Report on the Proposal for a European Parliament and Council Directive on the Activities of Institutions for Occupational Retirement Provision, PE 295.986/AM/48-134 (8 May 2001), 52.Google Scholar

93 Investment Modernization Act (Investmentmodernisierungsgesetz), 2003, para. 9(2).Google Scholar

94 Law on the Supervision of Insurance Companies (Versicherungsaufsichtsgesetz (VAG)), 17 December 1992, (1993) BGBl. I 2, para. 54 I, 115 I 3, II; and Pension Fund Investment decree-law (Pensionsfond-Kapitalanlageverordnung (PFKapAV)), 21 December 2001, (2001) BGBl. I 4185.Google Scholar

95 Para. 2, 3, 6, Regulation on the Investment of Assets of Insurance Companies (Verordnung ueber die Anlage des gebundenen Vermoegens von Versicherungsunternehmen (AnIV)), 20 December 2001, (2001) BGBl. I 3913.Google Scholar

96 Deutsches Institut fuer Altersvorsorge, Wie Pensionsfonds das Geld der Versicherten anlagen (2010), (last accessed 1 January 2011); Bundesanstalt fuer Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht, Jahresbericht 2009 114 (2010).Google Scholar

97 Scharlau, , supra note 1, 120–21.Google Scholar

98 Para. 115 Part 4, VAG,Google Scholar

99 Translation by Deutsche Bank Research, Responsible Investments 5 (24 June 2010), Scholar

100 Id. Google Scholar

101 Pensions Act, 1995; Occupational Pension Schemes (Investment) Regulations, 2005, cl. 2(3)(b)(vi)-(3)(c). The regulations were originally introduced in 1999.Google Scholar

102 Commercial Code (Handelsgesetzbuch (HGB)) as altered by the Law on Reasonable Wages of the Management Board (Vorstandsverguetungsgesetz (VorstAG) of 31 July 2009, (2009) BGBl. I 2509.Google Scholar

103 Id., para. 289 III.Google Scholar

104 See Accounting Law Reform Act, 2004 (Bilanzrechtsreformgesetz).Google Scholar

105 Directive 2003/51/EC of June 18, 2003, O.J. L.178, 2003; and Directive 78/660/EEC of 25 July 1978.Google Scholar

106 Bundesministerium fuer Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit, Was Investoren wollen - Nachhaltigkeit in der Lageberichterstattung 4 (2009).Google Scholar

107 Fortis Investments & Federal Environmental Ministry of Germany, supra note 69, 9.Google Scholar

108 Id., 10.Google Scholar

109 Id., 12.Google Scholar

110 Discussed in Wheelan, Hugh, Germany in Global SRI Adoption Comparison, Responsible-Investor.Com (23 November 2007), (last accessed on 1 January 2011).Google Scholar

111 See Denis Cormier, Michel Magnan, & Velthoven, Barbara Van, Environmental Disclosure Quality in Large German Companies: Economic Incentives, Public Pressures or Institutional Conditions? 14 Eur. Account. Rev. 3 (2005); Guthrie, James & Parker, Lee, Corporate Social Disclosure Practice: A Comparative International Analysis, 3 Advances in Public Interest Accounting 159 (1990).Google Scholar

112 Chris Gribben & Adam Faruk, Will UK Pension Funds Become More Responsible? A Survey of Trustees - 2004 (2004); Fair Pensions, UK Pension Scheme Transparency on Social, Environmental and Ethical Issues (2006).Google Scholar

113 Krewitt, Wolfram & Nitsch, Joachim, The German Renewable Energy Sources Act—An Investment into the Future Pays Off, Already Today, 28 Renewable Energy 533 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

114 Jacob, Klaus, et al., Leld Markets for Environmental Innovations 220 (2005).Google Scholar

115 Bundesanstalt fuer Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht, supra note 96, 114.Google Scholar

116 Eurosif, , supra note 56.Google Scholar

117 Schaefer, , supra note 51, 270Google Scholar

118 Schaefer, Henry, Nachhaltiges Bankgeschaeft als Heilsbringer in der Bankenkrise? Neue Missverstaendnisse und alte Selbstverstaendnisse, Forum Wirtschaftsethik 28, 33 (2009).Google Scholar

119 Schaefer, , supra note 68, 89.Google Scholar

120 Riedel, & Schneeweiss, , supra note 71, 1314.Google Scholar

121 Id. Google Scholar

122 Schaefer, , supra note 51, 270–71.Google Scholar

123 See Andreas Hackethal & Reinhard H. Schmidt. Financing Patterns: Measurement Concepts and Empirical Results (2003); Corbett, Jenny & Tim Jenkinson. The Financing of Industry, 1970-1989: An International Comparison, 10 J. Japanese & Int'l Economies 71 (1996).Google Scholar

124 Libby Assassi, Anastasia Nesvetailova & Wigan, Duncan, Global Finance in the New Century: Deregulation and Beyond, in Global Finance in the New Century: Beyond Deregulation 1, 7 (Libby Assassi, Anastasia Nesvetailova & Duncan Wigan eds., 2007).Google Scholar

125 Cioffi, John W., Corporate Governance Reform, Regulatory Politics, and the Foundations of Finance Capitalism in the United States and Germany, 7 German L.J. 533, 540 (2006).Google Scholar

126 Riedel, & Schneeweiss, , supra note 71, 15.Google Scholar

127 Kengelbach, Jens & Roos, Alexander, Entflechtung der Deutschland AG – Empirische Untersuchung der Reduktion von Kapital- und Personalverflechtungen zwischen deutschen boersennotierten Gesellschaften, M. & A. Rev. 11, 11 (2006).Google Scholar

128 Riedel, & Schneeweiss, , supra note 71, 15.Google Scholar

129 See Second Financial Market Promotion Act (Gesetz ueber den Wertpapierhandel und zur Aenderung boersenrechtlicher und wertpapierrechtlicher Vorschriften (2. FFG)), 26 July 1994, (1994) BGBl. I 1749; Law on Control and Transparency in the Commercial Sector (Gesetz zur Kontrolle und Transparenz im Unternehmensbereich (KonTraG)), 30 April 1998, (1998) BGBl. I 768; Law to facilitate the Raising of Capital (Kapitalaufnahmeerleichterungsgesetz (KapAEG)), April 20, 1998, (1998) BGBl. I 707; Law on the further Reform of Corporation Law and Accounting Law (Gesetz zur weiteren Reform des Aktien- und Bilanzrechts, zu Transparenz und Publizitaet (TransPuG)), 26 July 2002, (2002) BGBl. I 2681; Law on the Improvement of Investor Protection (Anlageschutzverbesserungsgesetz (AnSVG)), 29 October 2004, (2004) BGBl. I 2630.Google Scholar

130 Kengelbach, & Roos, , supra note 127, 16.Google Scholar

131 Clark, & Wójcik, supra note 8, 128–29.Google Scholar

132 Riedel, & Schneeweiss, , supra note 71, 15.Google Scholar

133 Schaefer, , supra note 68, 9.Google Scholar

134 Schaefer, , supra note 51, 271.Google Scholar

135 Such corporations usually have to employ more than 2000 employees, para. 1, Law on Codetermination (Mitbestimmungsgesetz (MitbestG)) of 4 May 1976, (1976) BGBl. I 1153,Google Scholar

136 Id., para. 7.Google Scholar

137 Work councils can be elected by employees in companies which employ at least five employees, para. 1, Law on Work Councils (Betriebsverfassungsgesetz (BetrVG)), 25 September 2001, (2001) BGBl. I 2518; see further John Addison, Claus Schnabel & Joachim Wagner, Works Councils in Germany: Their Effects on Establishment Performance, 53 Ox. Econ. Papers 659 (2001).Google Scholar

138 Schaefer, , supra note 51, 271.Google Scholar

139 Klaus Hopt, J. & Leyens, Patrick C., Board Models in Europe. Recent Developments of Internal Corporate Governance Structures in Germany, the United Kingdom, France, and Italy 7 (2004).Google Scholar

140 Waring, Peter & Edwards, Tony, Socially Responsible Investment: Explaining its Uneven Development and Human Resource Management Consequences, 16(3) Corp. Gov. 135, 137 (2008).Google Scholar

141 Cioffi, , supra note 125, 551.Google Scholar

142 Schaefer, , supra note 51, 270–71.Google Scholar

143 There were approximately 15,000 stock corporations in 2005: Ulrich Noack & Dirk Zetzsche, Corporate Governance Reform in Germany: The Second Decade, Euro Bus. L. Rev. 1033, 1034 (2005).Google Scholar

144 Frankfurt, Boerse, Aktiensuche (2010), Scholar

145 Emmons, William & Schmid, Frank, Universal Banking Rights, Control Rights and Corporate Finance in Germany, FRBSL 19, 29 (1998).Google Scholar

146 Noack, & Zetzsche, , supra note 143, 1034.Google Scholar

147 Richardson, Benjamin J., Greening the Financial Sector: Legal Reforms in the European Union, 7 Ybk Int'l Env'tl L. 159, 168 (2007).Google Scholar

148 Cioffi, , supra note 125, 540.Google Scholar

149 Id. Google Scholar

150 Noack, & Zetzsche, , supra note 143, 1036.Google Scholar

151 Riedel, & Schneeweiss, , supra note 71, 15.Google Scholar

152 Cioffi, , supra note 125, 540–41.Google Scholar

153 Emmons, & Schmid, , supra note 145, 28.Google Scholar

154 Cioffi, , supra note 125, 540.Google Scholar

155 See Sinn, Hans-Werner, Germany's Economic Unification: An Assessment after Ten Years, 10 Rev In't Econ. 113 (2002).Google Scholar

156 Among the most important laws were the Second Financial Market Promotion Act (Gesetz ueber den Wertpapierhandel und zur Aenderung boersenrechtlicher und wertpapierrechtlicher Vorschriften (2 FFG)), 26 July 1994, (1994) BGBl. I 1749.Google Scholar

157 Law on the Improvement of Investor Protection (Anlageschutzverbesserungsgesetz (AnSVG)), Oct. 29, 2004, (2004) BGBl. I 2630.Google Scholar

158 Law on the Introduction of International Accounting Standards and on the Enhancenment of the Quality of Annual Audits (Gesetz zur Einfuehrung internationaler Rechnungslegungsstandards und zur Sicherung der Qualitaet der Abschlusspruefung; Bilanzrechtsreformgesetz (BilReG)), 4 December 2004, (2004) BGBl. I 3166.Google Scholar

159 Richardson, , supra note 147, 168.Google Scholar

160 Streeck, Wolfgang, German Capitalism: Does It Exist? Can It Survive? 2 New Polit. Econ. 23 (1997).Google Scholar

161 Law on Control and Transparency (Gesetz zur Kontrolle und Transparenz im Unternehmensbereich (KonTraG)), 30 April 1998, (1998) BGBl. I 786.Google Scholar

162 Law on Stock Corporations (Aktiengesetz (AktG)), 6 September 1965, (1965) BGBl. I 1089.Google Scholar

163 Para. 139, AktG.Google Scholar

164 Cioffi, , supra note 125, 554.Google Scholar

165 Noack, & Zetzsche, , supra note 143, 1039.Google Scholar

166 Id. Google Scholar

167 Id, 1038.Google Scholar

168 Law on Corporate Integrity and Modernisation of the Right of Resolution-Annulment (Gesetz zur Unternehmensintegritaet und Modernisierung des Anfechtungsrechts (UMAG)), 22 September 2005, (2005) BGBl. I 2802.Google Scholar

169 Schaefer, Hans, Shareholder Activism und Corporate Governance, Neue Zeitschrift für Gesellschaftsrecht 900, 900 (2007).Google Scholar

170 Enshrined in para. 127a, AktG.Google Scholar

171 Naruisch, Till & Liepe, Fabian, Latest Developments in the German Law on Public Companies by the Act on Corporate Integrity and Modernisation of the Right of Resolution-Annulment (UMAG) – Shareholder Activism and Directors’ Liability Reloaded, J. Bus. L. 225, 236 (2007).Google Scholar

172 Law on the Implementation of the Directive of Shareholder Rights (Gesetz zur Umsetzung der Aktionaersrichtlinie (ARUG)), 30 July 2009, (2009) BGBl. I 2479; and see Directive 2007/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on the exercise of certain rights of shareholders in listed companies.Google Scholar

173 Drinhausen, Florian & Keinath, Astrid, Auswirkungen des ARUG auf die kuenftige Hauptversammlungspraxis, Betriebs Berater 2322, 2322 (2009); see para.124a 1 Nr. 1, 3, AktG.Google Scholar

174 Para. 118 I 2, AktG.Google Scholar

175 Zetzsche, Dirk, Die neue Aktionaersrechte-Richtlinie: Auf dem Weg zur Virtuellen Hauptversammlung, Neue Zeitschrift für Gesellschaftsrecht 686, 692 (2007).Google Scholar

176 See para. 20-29 Investment Code (Investmentgesetz (InvG)), 15 December 2003, (2003) BGBl. I 2676.Google Scholar

177 See para. 135 14, III 3, AktG.Google Scholar

178 Riedel, & Schneeweiss, , supra note 71, at 20.Google Scholar

179 Para. 135 III 3, AktG.Google Scholar

180 Id., para. 135 15.Google Scholar

181 Id., para. 76 I.Google Scholar

182 Id., para. 111 I.Google Scholar

183 Scharlau, , supra note 1, at 147.Google Scholar

184 Para. 131 I 1, Aktiengesetz.Google Scholar

185 Id., para. 289 III, 315 I 4, HGB.Google Scholar

186 Id., para. 176 I 2, 175 II.Google Scholar

187 Id., para. 131 III.Google Scholar

188 Id., para. 124 IV 2, 126.Google Scholar

189 Id., para. 122 I. This section also provides that a company's articles of incorporation may deviate from this standard to set a lower percentage of shareholder votes necessary to call a meeting.Google Scholar

190 Id., para. 122 II.Google Scholar

191 Id., para. 76 1.Google Scholar

192 Id. Google Scholar

193 Id., para. 119 I Nr. 1.Google Scholar

194 Id., para. 53a.Google Scholar

195 Para. 13 I, Securities Trading Act (Wertpapierhandelsgesetz (WpHG)), 9 September 1998, (1998) BGBl. I 2708.Google Scholar

196 See para. 13 I 3 Nr. 1, WpHG; Schaefer, supra note 169, 901.Google Scholar

197 The relevant part of the Code provides “The Management Board is responsible for independently managing the enterprise with the objective of sustainable creation of value and in the interest of the enterprise, thus taking into account the interests of the shareholders, its employees and other stakeholders” (emphasis added).Google Scholar

198 Deipenbrock, Gudula, Sustainable Development, the Interest(s) of the Company and the Role of the Board from the Perspective of a German Aktiengesellschaft, University of Oslo Faculty of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series No. 2010-02, 22-23 (2010).Google Scholar

199 Schaefer, , supra note 118, 271.Google Scholar

200 Richardson, , supra note 147, 167–68.Google Scholar

201 Hackethal, Andreas, German Banks and Banking Structure, in The German Financial System 71, 71 (Jan P. Krahnen & Reinhard H Schmidt eds., 2004); Edwards, Jeremy & Fischer, Klaus, Banks, Finance and Investment in Germany (1994).Google Scholar

202 Onetti, Alberto & Pisoni, Alessia, Ownership and Control in Germany: Do Cross-Shareholdings Reflect Bank Control on Large Companies? 6 Corp. Ownership & Control 54, 73 (2009).Google Scholar

203 Goetzl, Stephan & Gros, Juergen, Regionalbanken seit 160 Jahren: Die Volksbanken und Raiffeisenbanken – Merkmale, Strukturen, Leistungen 12 (2009).Google Scholar

204 Cioffi, , supra note 125, 551.Google Scholar

205 See Richardson, , supra note 147, 168.Google Scholar

206 Allan Brunner, et al., Germany s Three-Pillar Banking System: Cross Country Perspectives in Europe 2 (2004); Bundesbank, Deutsche, Die Ertragslage der deutschen Kreditinstitute, September 2010 12 (2010), (last accessed 1 January 2011).Google Scholar

207 See para. 2 I-III, Law on Savings Banks of the State of North Rhine-Westphalia (Sparkassengesetz (SpkG)), 18 November 2008, (2008) GV NRW 696/ SGV NRW 764.Google Scholar

208 Hackethal, , supra note 201, 79.Google Scholar

209 See para. 1 I, Law on Cooperatives (Genossenschaftsgesetz (GenG)), Oct. 16, 2006, (2006) BGBl. I 2230.Google Scholar

210 See (last accessed 1 January 2011).Google Scholar

211 See (last accessed 1 January 2011).Google Scholar

213 Marcel Jeucken &Jan Bouma, The Changing Environment of Banks, 27 Greener Man. Int'l 21 (1999); European Association of Co-operative Banks, Corporate Social Responsibility: The Performance of Cooperative Banks (2005).Google Scholar

214 Busch, Timo & Orbach, Thomas, Zukunftsfaehiger Finanzsektor: Die Nachhaltigkeitsleistung von Banken und Versicherungen 35-36 (2003), (last accessed 1 January 2011).Google Scholar

215 Id. Google Scholar

216 Id., 40.Google Scholar

217 Id., 41-42.Google Scholar

218 Ulf Schrader, Ignorant Advice - Customer Advisory Service for Ethical Investment Funds, 15 Bus. Strat. Env't 200, 200 (2006).Google Scholar

219 Von Marvin Oppong und Peter Wensierski, Banken: Sündige Rendite, Spiegel (Sept. 12, 2010);,1518,717173-2,00.html (last accessed 12 February 2011).Google Scholar

220 There are a few examples in other jurisdictions, which illustrate the legal risks. For example, in 2008 the US Securities Exchange Commission reached a US$500,000 civil settlement with Pax World Management for its negligent failure to comply with its self-imposed SRI restrictions, in violation of securities regulations: US Securities Exchange Commission, In the Matter of Pax World Management Corp., Administrative Proceeding File No. 3-13107 (July, 2008).Google Scholar

221 Perhaps the most famous judgment regarding the liability of financial advisers for misinforming clients about investments is the “Bond” case, decided by the German Supreme Court: BGH 6 July 1993, BGHZ 123, 126. According to the Court, the recommended investment advice should be geared towards the personal circumstances of the client and thus be suitable for that client. If the bank lacks information concerning these facts about the client, it is obliged to obtain such information, ruled the Court. There has been considerable recent case law relating to clients suing their banks for failure to advise about the risks associated with Lehman Brothers investments: e.g., LG Potsdam of 24 June 2009 (8 O. 61/09); LG Hamburg of 10 July 2009 (329 O. 44/09). See further about the Lehman litigation, Klaus Maerker, Fehlerhafte Anlageberatung beim Verkauf von Lehman-Zertifikaten - eine Zwischenbilanz, 10 Neue Juristische Online-Zeitschrift 524 (2010).Google Scholar

222 See Coester, Michael & Markesimis, Basil, Liability of Financial Experts in German and American Law: An Exercise in Comparative Methodology, 51 AM. J. COMP. L. 275 (2003).Google Scholar

223 Notably, Directive 2004/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 Apr. 2004 on markets in financial instruments amending Council Directives 85/611/EEC and 93/6EEC and Directive 2000/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 93/22/EEC, OJEC 2004 L 145/1. See further, Olha O. Cherednychenko, European Securities Regulation, Private Law and the Investment Firm-Client Relationship, 5 Euro Rev. Private L. 925 (2009).Google Scholar

224 See para. 1, SpkVO.Google Scholar

225 Law on Banks and other Providers of Financial Services (Gesetz ueber das Kreditwesen (KWG)), Sept 9, 1998, (1998) BGBl. I 2776.Google Scholar

226 Goetzl, & Gros, , supra note 203, 100.Google Scholar

227 BayernLB und WestLB beraten ueber Fusion, Der Tagesspiegel (Sept. 20, 2010), (last accessed 1 January 2011).Google Scholar

228 Schaefer, , supra note 123, 36.Google Scholar

229 Deutscher Sparkassen- und Giroverband, Zufriedene Kunden durch hochwertige Beratung – Das Selbstverstaendnis der Sparkassen in der Anlageberatung (2010); Deutscher Sparkassen- und Giroverband, Vertrauen gewinnt - Lehren aus der Finanzkrise (2010).Google Scholar

230 Eurosif, , supra note 56, 35.Google Scholar

231 Gillmann, Barbara, Aktien sind genauso out wie Drogen, Handelsblatt (2010),;2655342 (last visited Jan. 1, 2011); Konservative Geldanlagen im Aufwaertstrend, Geld-Magazin (2009), (last accessed 1 January 2011).Google Scholar

232 Schaefer, , supra note 68, 89.Google Scholar

233 Waring, & Edwards, , supra note 140, 141.Google Scholar