Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:06:48.299Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

European Court of Human Rights Rules in the On-going Dispute Between Liechtenstein and Germany

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Frank Schorkopf

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

On July 12, 2001, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) handed down its judgement in the case of Prince Hans-Adam II of Liechtenstein v. Germany (application number 42527/98). The Court of Human Rights unanimously rejected the applicant's alle-gation that Germany violated Article 6 § 1 (access to court and fairness of the proceedings), Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property) and Article 14 (prohibition of discrimination) of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Type
Research Article
Information
German Law Journal , Volume 2 , Issue 15 , 2001 , E3
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 by German Law Journal GbR 

References

MacLaren, Malcolm, Liechtenstein Files Lawsuit in the I C J Against Germany In Respect Of Seized Property, 2 GERMAN L.J. 10 (June 15, 2001), www.germanlawjournal.com.Google Scholar
See, Apeh Üldözötteinek Szövetsége, Iványi Ráth and Szerdahelyi v. Hungary, No. 32367/96, § 39, HUDOC-Reference: REF00001825.Google Scholar
See, Jewish liturgical association Cha'are Shalom Ve Tsedek v. France [GC], No. 27417/95, § 86, ECHR 2000-VII.Google Scholar
See, Decisions by the European Commission of Human Rights, X v. Austria of 6 Febru-ary 1969, No. 3374/67, Yearbook 12, p. 247 and N., C., F. and A.G. v. Italy of 4 December 1995, No. 4236/94, D.R. 84-B, p. 84.Google Scholar