Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T14:54:59.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Celebrating the Milk Maid: What Federal Constitutional Court President Limbach Doesn't Tell Us About the Court Says It All

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

It's a small book. Actually, it is a very small book. Only one hundred and twenty-eight pages, it's a format so thin it could fit into a pocket. As a matter of fact, it is smaller than a copy of the Grundgesetz (German Basic Law) that a German law student would carry along to class. The book's title, however, is considerably more intrepid than the book's small stature. At the same time breathtakingly pithy and slightly immodest, the book is simply called Das Bundesverfassungsgericht (The Federal Constitutional Court). And at the top of the cover, just to make sure, the word “WISSEN” (KNOWLEDGE) appears in big letters. While one wonders how a publication of such limited size could deign to comprehensively present the important “knowledge” of the Federal Constitutional Court, the other words on the cover provide some assurance. Those words are the name of the book's author who obviously could not be more adequate for the task. The author, Jutta Limbach, is the current President of the Federal Constitutional Court presiding in her seventh year.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 by German Law Journal GbR 

References

LIMBACH, JUTTA, DAS BUNDESVERFASSUNGSGERICHT 20 (2001).Google Scholar
Id. at 72; 88.Google Scholar
Roellecke, Gerd, Zum Problem einer Reform der Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit, 2001 JURISTEN-ZEITUNG 114, at 119.Google Scholar
For just two examples of the flaws inherent in the jurisdiction of the Federal Constitutional Court and new, more suitable approaches, see Karl-Heinz Ladeur, Das Bundesverfassungsgericht als “Bürgergericht”?, 31RECHTSTHEORIE 67–99 (2000); Gunther Teubner, Ein Fall struktureller Korruption?, Die Familienbürgschaft in der Kollision unverträglicher Handlungslogiken, 83 KRITISCHE VIERTELJAHRESSCHRIFT FÜR GESETZGEBUNG UND RECHTSWISSENSCHAFT 388–404 (2000).Google Scholar