Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T14:46:43.193Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

V.—Note on the Devonian Fishes of Soaumenao Bay and Campbelltown in Canada1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Extract

The researches of the officers of the Geological Survey of X Canada have brought to light, in the Devonian rocks of Scaumenac Bay and of Campbelltown, a series of fossil fishes which are of especial interest to the geologist as well as to the zoologist, on account of the analogies which they bear to the fishes of the Old Eed Sandstone of Great Britain. Principally collected by Mr. G. H. Foord, these fishes have been described by Mr. J. F. Whiteaves, and are indeed remarkable for their beautiful state of preservation, which enables them to throw fresh light on many points in the structure of these ancient forms.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1890

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Read before Section C of the British Association at Newcastle-on-Tyne, September 16th, 1889.

References

page 15 note 2 Am. Joum. Sc. and Arts (3), xx. 1880; Canad. Naturalist, n. ser. x.; Am. Naturalist, xix. 1885; Canad. Nat. and Quart. Journ. Sc. n.s. vol. x. 1881. Whiteaves, 's detailed descriptions are given in two quarto memoirs entitled “Illustrations of the Fossil Fishes of Canada,” from the Trans. Koy. Soc. Canada, vol. iv. sec. iv. 1886Google Scholar, and vol. vi. sec. iv. 1888.

page 15 note 3 On the position of the orbit in Phaneropleuron Andersoni see Traquair, GEOL. MAO. Vol. VIII. 1871, pp. 530–531.

page 16 note 1 GEOL. MAG. Dec. III. Vol. V. 1888, p. 511.

page 19 note 1 Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin. vol. xxx. 1881.

page 19 note 2 Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin. vol. xxvii. 1874.

page 19 note 3 Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin. pi. xxxii. fig. 9.

page 20 note 1 Homosteus compared with Coccosteus, GEOL. MAG. Dec. III. Vol. VI. Jan. 1889Google Scholar, PI. I. Fig. 2 a, e.

page 21 note 1 Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist. (6) iv. p. 183.