Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T16:28:48.957Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Miniature deep-sea hatchetfish (Teleostei: Stomiiformes) from the Miocene of Italy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 September 2007

GIORGIO CARNEVALE*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Pisa, via Santa Maria, 53, I-56126 Pisa, Italy, and Museo di Storia Naturale e del Territorio, Università di Pisa, via Roma, 79, I-56011 Calci, Italy

Abstract

A new genus and species of deep-sea hatchetfish, Discosternon federicae gen. et sp. nov., is described from the Middle Miocene (Serravallian) calciturbititic deposits of the Tufillo Unit exposed near the town of Gessopalena, central Italy. It is based on a single, very small, well-preserved and nearly complete specimen that exhibits a discoid physiognomy and a unique combination of features, many of which are reductive (loss of dorsal blade, loss of anal-fin hiatus, loss of abdominal keel-like structure, reduction of number of supraneurals, reduction of number of caudal vertebrae, presence of slender neural and haemal spines, external surface of cleithrum smooth). The comparative morphological analysis indicates that Discosternon is probably related to the derived genera Horbatshia and Sternoptyx. The highly reduced body size and the possession of many reductive characters indicate that Discosternon can be presumed to be a miniature fish. Anatomical and morphofunctional considerations suggest that Discosternon possibly was a midwater plankton feeder characterized by a reduced locomotory ability.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agassiz, L. 1833–44. Recherches sur les poissons fossiles. Neuchâtel: Petitpierre, 1420 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahlstrom, E. H., Richards, W. J. & Weitzman, S. H. 1984. Families Gonostomatidae, Sternoptychidae, and associated stomiiform groups: development and relationships. In Ontogeny and Systematics of Fishes (eds Moser, H. G., Richards, W. J., Cohen, D. M., Fahay, M. P., Kendall, A. W. Jr & Richardson, S. L.), pp. 184–98. American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists Special Publication 1.Google Scholar
Alberch, P. 1985. Problems with the interpretation of developmental sequences. Systematic Zoology 34, 4658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arambourg, C. 1929. Argyropelecus logearti, un nouveau poisson bathypelagique du Sahélien. Bulletin de la Société Gèologique de France 29, 11–5.Google Scholar
Arambourg, C. 1952. Les poissons crétacés du Jebel Tselfat (Maroc). Notes et Mémoires du Service Géologique du Maroc 118, 1188.Google Scholar
Badcock, J. & Baird, R. C. 1980. Remarks on the systematics, development, and distribution of the hatchetfish genus Sternoptyx (Pisces, Stomiatoidei). Fishery Bulletin 77, 803–20.Google Scholar
Baird, R. C. 1971. The systematics, distribution, and zoogeography of the marine hatchetfishes (family Sternoptychidae). Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 142, 1128.Google Scholar
Baird, R. C. & Eckardt, M. J. 1972. Divergence and relationship in deep-sea hatchetfishes (Sternoptychidae). Systematic Zoology 21, 8090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertelsen, E. 1951. The ceratioid fishes. Ontogeny, taxonomy, distribution and biology. Dana Report 39, 1276.Google Scholar
Britz, R. & Kottelat, M. 2003. Descriptive osteology of the Family Chaudhuriidae (Teleostei, Synbranchiformes, Mastacembeloidei), with a discussion of its relationships. American Museum Novitates 3418, 162.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnevale, G. 2002. A new barbeled dragonfish (Teleostei: Stomiiformes: Stomiidae) from the Miocene of Torricella Peligna, Italy: Abruzzoichthys erminioi gen. & sp. nov. Eclogae geologicae Helvetiae 95, 471–9.Google Scholar
Carnevale, G. 2003. Redescription and phylogenetic relationships of Argyropelecus logearti (Teleostei: Stomiiformes: Sternoptychidae) with a brief review of fossil Argyropelecus. Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia 109, 6376.Google Scholar
Carnevale, G. 2005. Fossil fishes from the Serravallian (Middle Miocene) of Torricella Peligna, Italy. Palaeontographia Italica 91, 369.Google Scholar
Ciaranfi, N., Dazzaro, L., Pieri, P. & Rapisardi, L. 1980. I depositi del Miocene superiore al confine molisano-abruzzese. Bollettino della Società Geologica Italiana 99, 103–18.Google Scholar
Costa, W. J. E. M. & Le Bail, P.-Y. 1999. Fluviphylax palikur: a new poeciliid from the Rio Oiapoque Basin, Northern Brazil (Cyrpinodontiformes: Cyprinodontoidei), with comments on miniaturization in Fluviphylax and other neotropical freshwater fishes. Copeia 1999, 1027–34.Google Scholar
Davis, W. P. & Birdsong, R. J. 1973. Coral reef fishes which forage in the water column. Helgoländer Wissenshaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen 24, 292306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Nocera, S. & Torre, M. 1987. Geologia dell'area compresa tra Deliceto e Scampitella (Appennino foggiano). Bollettino della Società Geologica Italiana 106, 351–64.Google Scholar
Fink, W. L. & Weitzman, S. H. 1982. Relationships of the stomiiform fishes (Teleostei), with a description of Diplophos. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 150, 3193.Google Scholar
Forey, P. L. & Patterson, C. 2006. Description and systematic relationships of †Tomognathus, an enigmatic fish from the English Chalk. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 4, 157–84.Google Scholar
Fornaciari, E., Di Stefano, A., Rio, D. & Negri, A. 1996. Middle Miocene quantitative calcareous nannofossil biostratigraphy in the Mediterranean region. Micropaleontology 42, 3763.Google Scholar
Fryer, G. 1959. Some aspects of evolution in Lake Nyassa. Evolution 13, 440–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, T. N. 1884. Note on the Sternoptychidae. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 7, 349–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goode, G. B. & Bean, T. H. 1896. Oceanic ichthyology, a treatise on the deep-sea and pelagic fishes of the world, based chiefly upon the collections made by the steamers Blake, Albatross, and Fish Hawk in the northwestern Atlantic, with an atlas containing 417 figures. Memoirs of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 22, 1553.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. 1977. Ontogeny and phylogeny. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 501 pp.Google Scholar
Grey, M. 1959. Three new genera and one new species of the family Gonostomatidae. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 121, 167–84.Google Scholar
Grey, M. 1960. A preliminary review of the family Gonostomatidae, with a key to the genera and the description of a new species from the tropical Pacific. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 122, 57125.Google Scholar
Günther, A. 1864. Catalogue of the fishes in the British Museum. Catalogue of the Physostomi, London, vol. 5. London: British Museum (Natural History), 455 pp.Google Scholar
Hanken, J. & Wake, D. B. 1993. Miniaturization of body size: organismal consequences and evolutionary significance. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24, 501–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harold, A. S. 1993. Phylogenetic relationships of the sternoptychid Argyropelecus (Teleostei: Stomiiformes). Copeia 1993, 123–33.Google Scholar
Harold, A. S. 1994. A taxonomic revision of the sternoptychid genus Polyipnus (Teleostei: Stomiiformes), with an analysis of phylogenetic relationships. Bulletin of Marine Science 54, 428534.Google Scholar
Harold, A. S. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships of the Gonostomatidae (Teleostei: Stomiiformes). Bulletin of Marine Science 62, 715–41.Google Scholar
Harold, A. S. & Weitzman, S. H. 1996. Interrelationships of stomiiform fishes. In Interrelationships of fishes (eds Stiassny, M. L. J., Parenti, L. R. & Johnson, G. D.),pp. 333–53. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hopkins, T. L. & Baird, R. C. 1973. Diet of the hatchetfish Sternoptyx diaphana. Marine Biology 21, 3446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, T. L. & Baird, R. C. 1985. Feeding ecology of four hatchetfishes (Sternoptychidae) in the eastern Gulf of Mexico. Bulletin of Marine Science 36, 260–77.Google Scholar
Howell, W. H. & Krueger, W. H. 1987. Family Sternoptychidae, marine hatchetfishes and related species. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 452, 3250.Google Scholar
Johnson, G. D. & Brothers, E. B. 1993. Schindleria: a paedomorphic goby (Teleostei: Gobioidei). Bulletin of Marine Science 52, 441–71.Google Scholar
Kinzer, J. & Schulz, K. 1988. Vertical distribution and feeding patterns of midwater fish in the central equatorial Atlantic. II. Sternoptychidae. Marine Biology 99, 261–9.Google Scholar
Kottelat, M., Britz, R., Hui, T. H. & Witte, K.-E. 2006. Paedocypris, a new genus of Southeast Asian cyprinid fish with a remarkable sexual dimorphism, comprises the world's smallest vertebrate. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 273, 895–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Landini, W. & Menesini, E. 1978. L'ittiofauna plio-pleistocenica della sezione della Vrica (Crotone – Calabria). Bollettino della Società Paleontologica Italiana 17, 143–75.Google Scholar
Landini, W. & Menesini, E. 1986. L'ittiofauna della sez. di Stuni e i suoi rapporti con l'ittiofauna plio-pleistocenica della Vrica (Crotone, Calabria). Bollettino della Società Paleontologica Italiana 25, 4163.Google Scholar
Landini, W. & Sorbini, L. 1993. Biogeographic and palaeoclimatic relationships of the Middle Pliocene ichthyofauna of the Samoggia Torrent (Bologna, Italy). Ciências da Terra 12, 83–9.Google Scholar
Lauder, G. V. & Liem, K. F. 1983. The evolution and interrelationships of actinopterygian fishes. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 150, 65197.Google Scholar
Lipps, J. H. & Hickman, C. S. 1982. Origin, age, and evolution of Antarctic and deep-sea faunas. In The Environment of the Deep Sea (eds Ernst, W. G., Morin, J. G. & Rubey, I. I.), pp. 324–56. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Myers, G. S. 1958. Trends in the evolution of teleostean fishes. Stanford Ichthyological Bulletin 7, 2730.Google Scholar
Nelson, J. S. 1994. Fishes of the World. 3rd Edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 600 pp.Google Scholar
Patacca, E., Scandone, P., Bellatalla, M., Perilli, N. & Santini, U. 1992. La zona di giunzione tra l'arco appenninico settentrionale e l'arco appenninico meridionale nell'Abruzzo e nel Molise. In Studi preliminari all'acquisizione dati del profilo CROP 11 Civitavecchia-Vasto (eds Tozzi, M., Cavinato, G. P. & Parlotto, M.). Studi Geologici Camerti Special Publication 1991/2, 417–41.Google Scholar
Patterson, C. 1993. Osteichthyes: Teleostei. In The Fossil Record 2 (ed. Benton, M. J.), pp. 621–56. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Patterson, C. & Rosen, D. E. 1977. Review of ichthyodectiform and other Mesozoic teleost fishes and the theory and practice of classifying fossils. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 158, 81172.Google Scholar
Pietsch, T. W. 1976. Dimorphism, parasitism and sex: reproductive strategies among deep-sea ceratioid anglerfishes. Copeia 1976, 781–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pietsch, T. W. 2005. Dimorphism, parasitism, and sex revisited: modes of reproduction among deep-sea ceratioid anglerfishes (Teleostei: Lophiiformes). Ichthyological Research 52, 207–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokofiev, A. M. 2002. Sternoptychidae (Stomiiformes) in Eocene to Lower Oligocene of Caucaus and Ukrainian Carpathian Mountains. Journal of Ichthyology 42, 1927.Google Scholar
Prokofiev, A. M. 2005. Systematics and phylogeny of the stomiiform fishes (Neoteleostei: Stomiiformes) from the Paleogene–Neogene of Russia and adjacent regions. Journal of Ichthyology 45, S89S162.Google Scholar
Raff, R. A. 1996. The shape of life. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 520 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regan, C. T. 1923. The classification of stomiatoid fishes. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 11, 612–14.Google Scholar
Regan, C. T. 1925. Dwarfed males parasitic on the females in oceanic angler-fishes (Pediculati, Ceratioidea). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 97, 386400.Google Scholar
Rosen, D. E. 1973. Interrelationships of euteleostean fishes. In Interrelationships of fishes (eds Greenwood, P. H., Miles, R. S. & Patterson, C.), pp. 397–513. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 53, Supplement 1.Google Scholar
Sanzo, L. 1931. Sottordine: Stomiatoidei. Fauna e Flora del Golfo di Napoli 38, 4292.Google Scholar
Schaefer, S. A., Weitzman, S. H. & Britski, H. A. 1989. Review of the neotropical catfish genus Scolopax (Pisces: Loricarioidea: Scolopacidae) with comments on reductive characters in phylogenetic analysis. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 141, 181211.Google Scholar
Schultz, L. P. 1961. Revision of the marine silver hatchetfishes (family Sternoptychidae). Proceedings of the United States National Museum 112, 587649.Google Scholar
Schultz, L. P. 1964. Family Sternoptychidae. Memoirs of the Sears Foundation for Marine Research 4, 241–73.Google Scholar
Selli, R. 1962. Il Paleogene nel quadro dell'Italia meridionale. Memorie della Società Geologica Italiana 3, 154.Google Scholar
Siebert, D. 1997. Notes on the anatomy and relationships of Sundasalanx Roberts (Teleostei, Clupeidae), with descriptions of four new species from Borneo. Bulletin of the Natural History Museum, London (Zoology) 63, 1326.Google Scholar
Sorbini, C. & Landini, W. 2003. A new fishfauna in the Plio-Pleistocene of Monte Singa (Calabria, southern Italy). Bollettino della Società Paleontologica Italiana 42, 185–9.Google Scholar
Sorbini, L. 1988. Biogeography and climatology of Pliocene and Messinian fossil fish of Eastern-Central Italy. Bollettino del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Verona 14, 185.Google Scholar
Springer, V. G. 1983. Tyson belos, new genus and species of western Pacific fish (Gobiidae, Xenisthminae), with discussions of gobioid classification. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 390, 140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Springer, V. G. 1988. Rotuma lewisi, new genus and species of fish from the southwest Pacific (Gobioidei, Xenisthmidae). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 101, 530–9.Google Scholar
Thompson, D. W. 1917. On Growth and Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1116 pp.Google Scholar
Tyler, J. C. 1970. A redescription of the inquiline carapid fish Onuxodon parvibrachium, with a discussion of the skull structure and the host. Bulletin of Marine Science 20, 148–64.Google Scholar
Warrant, E. J. & Locket, N. A. 2004. Vision in the deep sea. Biological Reviews 79, 671712.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watson, W. & Walker, H. J. Jr. 2004. The world's smallest vertebrate, Schindleria brevipinguis, a new paedomorphic species in the family Schindleriidae (Perciformes: Gobioidei). Records of the Australian Museum 56, 139–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weitzman, S. H. 1967. The origin of stomiatoid fishes with comments on the classification of salmoniform fishes. Copeia 1967, 507–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weitzman, S. H. 1974. Osteology and evolutionary relationships of the Sternoptychidae with a new classification of stomiatoid families. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 153, 329479.Google Scholar
Weitzman, S. H. & Fink, W. L. 1983. Relationships of the neon tetras, a group of South American freshwater fishes (Teleostei, Characidae), with comments on the phylogeny of New World characiforms. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 150, 339–95.Google Scholar
Weitzman, S. H. & Vari, R. P. 1988. Miniaturization in South American freshwater fishes: An overview and discussion. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 101, 444–65.Google Scholar
West-Eberhard, M. J. 2003. Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 794 pp.Google Scholar
Wettstein, A. 1886. Über die Fishfauna des tertiären Glarnen-schiefers. Abhandlungen der Schweizerischen Gesellshaft 13, 1103.Google Scholar
Whitehead, P. J. P. & Teugels, G. G. 1985. The West African pygmy herring Sierrathrissa leonensis; general features, visceral anatomy, and osteology. American Museum Novitates 2835, 144.Google Scholar
Winterbottom, R. 1990. The Trimmatom nanus species complex (Actinopterygii, Gobiidae): phylogeny and progenetic heterochrony. Systematic Zoology 39, 253–65.Google Scholar