Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T09:04:05.044Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The ichnogenus Schaubcylindrichnus: morphological, temporal, and environmental significance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Robert W. Frey  and
S. George Pemberton
Robert W. Frey
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, U.S.A.
S. George Pemberton
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E3, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Schaubcylindrichnus, a distinctive sheaf of arcuate, well lined, congruent dwelling tubes, although poorly known in general, is a good indicator of shoreface depositional settings for many Cretaceous rocks of the United States. Until recently, in fact, it was known only from those rocks; but it has now been recognized in Tertiary rocks of Taiwan, possibly in slightly more distal depositional settings. In addition to its distinctive morphological and environmental significance, the ichnogenus also may have substantial biostratigraphical significance. Further reconnaissance is needed to confirm these seemingly unique distributions, that is, to help explain why the trace fossil so far seems to be restricted to certain Cretaceous rocks in North America and certain Tertiary rocks in Asia.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 128 , Issue 6 , November 1991 , pp. 595 - 602
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bromley, R. G. 1990. Trace Fossils, Biology and Tap-honomy. London: Unwin Hyman, 280 pp.Google Scholar
Campbell, C. V. 1971. Depositional model – Upper Cretaceous Gallup beach shoreline. Ship Rock area, northwestern New Mexico. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 41, 395–409.Google Scholar
Casey, R. 1961. The stratigraphical palaeontology of the Lower Greensand. Palaeontology 3, 487–621.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, C. K. 1976 a. Field guide to the trace fossils of the Cretaceous Dakota hogback along Alameda Avenue, west of Denver, Colorado. In Studies in Colorado Field Geology (edsEpis, R. C. and Weimer, R. J.), pp. 242–50. Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Professional Contribution no. 8.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, C. K. 1976 b. Field guide to the trace fossils of the Dakota hogback at the south end of Spring Canyon Dam, Horsetooth Reservoir, southwest of Fort Collins, Colorado. In Seminar on Trace Fossils (Chamberlain, C. K. and Frey, R. W.), pp. 34–6, 41–3. Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey, Golden.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, C. K. 1978. Recognition of trace fossils in cores. In Trace Fossil Concepts (ed. Basan, P. B.), pp. 133–83. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Short Course no. 5.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, C. K., Kauffman, E. G., Kiteley, L. M. W. & Lockley, M. G. 1985. A Field Guide to Environments of Deposition (and Trace Fossils) of Cretaceous Sand stones of the Western Interior. Rocky Mountain Section, Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Second Annual Midyear Meeting, Field Trip Guide-book no. 3, pp. 1–142.Google Scholar
Crimes, T. P. 1975. The stratigraphical significance of trace fossils. In The Study of Trace Fossils (ed. Frey, R. W.), pp. 109–30. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Curran, H. A. 1985. The trace fossil assemblage of a Cretaceous nearshore environment: Englishtown Formation of Delaware, U.S.A. In Biogenic Structures: Their Use in Interpreting Depositional Environments (ed. Curran, H. A.), pp. 261–76. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Special Publication no. 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckman, J. E., Nowell, A. R. M. & Jumars, P. A. 1981. Sediment destabilization by animal tubes. Journal of Marine Research 39, 361–74.Google Scholar
Fauchald, K. & Jumars, P. A. 1979. The diet of worms: a study of polychaete feeding guilds. Oceanography and Marine Biology, Annual Review 17, 193–284.Google Scholar
Frey, R. W. 1990. Trace fossils and hummocky cross-stratification, Upper Cretaceous of Utah. Palaios 5, 203–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, R. W. & Howard, J. D. 1970. Comparison of Upper Cretaceous ichnofaunas from siliceous sandstones and chalk, Western Interior Region, U.S.A. In Trace Fossils (eds Crimes, T. P. and Harper, J. C.), pp. 141–66. Geological Journal, Special Issue 3.Google Scholar
Frey, R. W. & Howard, J. D. 1981. Conichnus and Schaubcylindrichnus: redefined trace fossils from the Upper Cretaceous of the Western Interior. Journal of Paleontology 55, 800–4.Google Scholar
Frey, R. W. & Howard, J. D. 1982. Trace fossils from the Upper Cretaceous of the Western Interior: potential criteria for facies models. The Mountain Geologist 19, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, R. W. & Howard, J. D. 1990. Trace fossils and depositional sequences in a clastic shelf setting. Upper Cretaceous of Utah. Journal of Palenotology 64, 803–20.Google Scholar
Frey, R. W. & Pemberton, S. G. 1985. Biogenic structures in outcrops and cores. I. Approaches to ichnology. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology 33, 72–115.Google Scholar
Frey, R. W. & Wheatcroft, R. A. 1989. Organism-substrate relations and their impact on sedimentary petrology. Journal of Geological Education 37, 261–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, E. & Wang, Y. 1986. Sedimentary structures and trace fossils in the Wuchihshan Formation, Waiwulun Area, northern Taiwan. Ti-Chih 7 (1), 11–30.Google Scholar
Hong, E. & Wang, Y. 1988. Basin analysis of the upper Miocene–lower Phocene Series in northwestern Taiwan. Ti-Chih 8 (1–2), 1–22.Google Scholar
Howard, J. D. 1966. Characteristic trace fossils in Upper Cretaceous sandstones of the Book Cliffs and Wasatch Plateau. Utah Geological and Mineralogical Survey, Bulletin 80, 35–53.Google Scholar
Howard, J. D. 1972. Trace fossils as criteria for recognizing shorelines in stratigraphic record. In Recognition of Ancient Sedimentary Environments (eds Rigby, J. K. and Hamblin, W. K.), pp. 215–25. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Special Publication no. 16.Google Scholar
Howard, J. D. & Frey, R. W. 1984. Characteristic trace fossils in nearshore to offshore sequences. Upper Cretaceous of east-central Utah. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 21, 200–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, G. M. 1986. Inhibition of microbial activity in marine sediments by a bromophenol from a hemichordate. Nature 323, 257–9.Google Scholar
King, G. M. 1988. Dehalogenation in marine sediments containing natural sources of halophenols. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 54, 3079–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luckenbach, M. W. 1986. Sediment stability around animal tubes: the roles of hydrodynamic processes and biotic activity. Limnology and Oceanography 31, 779–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magwood, J. P. A. & Pemberton, S. G. 1990. Stratigraphic significance of Cruziana: new data concerning the Cambrian–Ordovician ichnostratigraphic paradigm. Geology 18, 729–32.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meadows, P. S. 1986. Biological activity and seabed sediment structure. Nature 323, 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, W. III, 1988. Giant Bathysiphon (Foraminiferida) from Cretaceous turbidites, northern California. Lethaia 21, 363–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pemberton, S. G. & Frey, R. W. 1982. Trace fossil nomenclature and the Planolites–Palaeophycus dilemma. Journal of Palaeontology 56, 843–81.Google Scholar
Pemberton, S. G. & Frey, R. W. 1983. Biogenic Structures in Upper Cretaceous Outcrops and Cores. Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists Conference, The Mesozoic of Middle North America, Calgary, Alberta, Field Trip Guidebook no. 8, pp. 1–161.Google Scholar
Pratt, L. M., Kauffman, E. G. & Zelt, F. B. (eds) 1985. Fine-Grained Deposits and Biofacies of the Cretaceous Western Interior Seaway: Evidence of Cyclic Sedimentary Processes. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Second Annual Midyear Meeting, Field Trip Guidebook no. 9, pp. 1–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhoads, D. C. 1967. Biogenic reworking of intertidal and subtidal sediments in Barnstable Harbor and Buzzards Bay, Massachusetts. Journal of Geology 75, 461–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhoads, D. C. & Boyer, L. F. 1982. The effects of marine benthos on physical properties of sediments, a successional perspective. In Animal-Sediment Relations (eds McCall, P. L. and Tevesz, M.J.S.), pp. 3–52. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Rhoads, D. C. & Stanley, D. J. 1965. Biogenic graded bedding. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 35, 956–63.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E. O. 1904. Fossils and age of the Yakutat Formation. Descriptions of collections made chiefly near Kadiak, Alaska. In Harriman Alaska Expedition, Geology and Paleontology 4 (ed. Merriam, C. H.), pp. 125–46. New York: Doubleday, Page & Company.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E. O. 1910. Fossils and age of the Yakutat Formation. Descriptions of collections made chiefly near Kadiak, Alaska. In Harriman Alaska Expedition, Geology and Paleontology 4 (ed. Merriam, C. H.), pp. 125–46. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Webb, J. E., Dörjes, D. J., Gray, J. S., Hessler, R. R., van Andel, T. H., Werner, F., Wolff, T. & Zijlstra, J. J. 1976. Organism-sediment relationships. In The Benthic Boundary Layer (ed. McCave, I. N.), pp. 273–95. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Zottoli, R. A. & Carriker, M. R. 1974. External release of protease by stationary burrow-dwelling polychaetes. Journal of Marine Research 32, 331–42.Google Scholar