Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T23:49:04.039Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A greenstone belt—basement relationship in the Tanganyika shield

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

I. S. Haidutov
I. S. Haidutov
Affiliation:
Geological Institute, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia — 13, Bulgaria
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

An Archaean greenstone belt, occupied by rocks of the Nyanzian System, rests apparently unconformably on a basement composed of the metamorphites of the Dodoman System in the central part of the Tanganyika shield. The latter were originally metamorphosed in granulite facies. Two episodes of migmatization were imposed on this earlier crust producing two complexes of anatectic granitoids (Puma and Ikungi) which locally have a charnockitic character. Differences in structural setting suggest that they were developed in connection with two major tectonic events. A basin-like structure was built up during the second – Ikungi – in which the Nyanzian System occurs. The Nyanzian rocks are not migmatized and their juxtaposition with the migmatites suggests that they are of younger age. Another tectonism took place after deposition of the greenstones as a result of which they were intensely deformed. Two types of intrusive granites were emplaced in the greenschists upgrading them to hornfelses during this tectonism. An interesting feature is the coincidence of the general tectonic axes of these three events. For the successively established metamorphic processes in this Archaean nucleus a gradual downgrading of metamorphic facies is characteristic, showing its irreversible development.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 113 , Issue 1 , January 1976 , pp. 53 - 60
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anhaeusser, C. R., Mason, R., Viljoen, M. J. & Viljoen, R. P. 1969. A reappraisal of some aspects of Precambrian shield geology. Bull. geol. Soc. Am. 80, 2175–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cahen, L. & Snelling, N. J. 1966. Geochronology of Equatorial Africa. North-Holland, 195 pp.Google Scholar
Coomer, P. G. & Robertson, D. K. 1974. A lead isotope study of Archaean mineralized areas in Tanzania. J. geol. Soc. 130, 449–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodson, N. H., Bell, K. & Shackleton, R. M. 1973. Archaean geochronology of East Africa. Fortschr. Miner. 50, 67–8.Google Scholar
Eades, N. W. 1936. The geology of the Iramba plateau. Short Pap.geol. Surv. Tanganyika, 15.Google Scholar
Eades, N. W. & Reeve, W. H. 1938. Explanation of the geology of Degree Sheet No 29 (Singida). Bull. geol. Surv. Tanganyika, 11.Google Scholar
Fozzard, P. M. H. 1961. Kwa Mtoro (Quarter Degree Sheet 123). Map geol. Surv. Tanzania.Google Scholar
Harpum, J. R. 1970. Summary of the geology of Tanzania. Mem. geol. Surv. Dep. Tanzania; Part V: Structural geology. Govt. Printer, Dar-es-Salaam, 58 pp.Google Scholar
Hepworth, J. V. 1964. The charnockites of Southern West Nile, Uganda, and their paragenesis. XXIIth Int. geol. Congr., India, part xiii, 169–85.Google Scholar
Hepworth, J. V. 1967. The photogeological recognition of ancient orogenic belts in Africa. Q. Jl Geol. Soc. Lond. 123, 253–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hepworth, J. V. 1972. The Mozambique orogenic belt and its foreland in NE Tanzania: a photogeologically-based study. J. geol. Soc. 128, 461–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, D. R. 1974. Crustal development in the Kaapvaal Craton; I. The Archaean. Precam. Res. 1, 259–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnell, R. B. 1951. Rift and shield structure in East Africa. XVIIIth Int. geol. Congr., Gr. Brit., 1948, part xiv, 199–207.Google Scholar
McDonald, R. 1964. ‘Charnockites’ in the West Nile district of Uganda: A systematic study in the Groves type area. XXIIth Int. geol. Congr., India, part XIII: 227–49.Google Scholar
McGlynn, J. C. & Henderson, J. B. 1970. Archean volcanism and sedimentation in the Slave structural province. In Baer, A. J. (Ed.): Symposium on Basins and Geosynclines of the Canadian shield. Pap. geol. Surv. Canada, 70–40, 31–45.Google Scholar
Old, R. A. & Rex, D. C. 1971. Rubidium and strontium age determination of some Precambrian granitic rocks, S.E. Ugana. Geol. Mag. 108, 353–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quennell, A. M., McKinlay, A. C. and Aitken, W. G. 1956. Summary of the geology of Tanzania. Mem. geol. Surv. Dep. Tanzania; Part I: Introduction and stratigraphy. Govt. Printer, Dar-es-Salaam, 264 pp.Google Scholar
Spooner, C. M., Hepworth, J. V. & Fairbairn, H. W. 1970. Whole-rock, Rb-Sr isotopic investigation of some East African granulites. Geol. Mag. 107, 511–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stowe, G. W. 1974. Alpine-type structures in the Rhodesian basement complex at Selukwe. J. geol. Soc. 130, 411–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, I., Besang, C., Harre, W., Krenzer, H., Leuz, H. & Müller, P. 1972. Age determinations of granitic intrusions and metamorphic events in the Early Precambrian of Tanzania. XXIVth Int. geol. Congr., Montreal; Sect. 1, 295–314.Google Scholar
Windley, B. F. & Bridgwater, D. 1971. The evolution of Archaean low- and high- grade terrains. Spec. PubI. Geol. Soc. Austr. 3, 33–46.Google Scholar