Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Estimators for pairwise relatedness and individual inbreeding coefficients

  • Kermit Ritland (a1)

Summary

Method-of-moments estimators (MMEs) for the two-gene coefficients of relationship and inbreeding, and for thxe four-gene Cotterman coefficients, are described. These estimators, which use co-dominant genetic markers, are most appropriate for estimating pairwise relatedness or individual inbreeding coefficients, as opposed to their mean values in a group. This is because, compared to the maximum likelihood estimate (MLE), they show reduced small-sample bias and lack distributional assumptions. The ‘efficient’ MME is an optimally weighted average of estimates given by each allele at each locus. Generally, weights must be computed numerically, but if true coefficients are assumed zero, simplifiedestimators are obtained whose relative efficiencies are quite high. Population gene frequency is assumed to be assayed ina larger, ‘reference population’ sample, and the biases introduced by small reference samples and/or genetic drift of the reference population are discussed. Individual-level estimates of relatedness or inbreeding, while displaying high variance, are useful in several applications as a covariate in population studies.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Estimators for pairwise relatedness and individual inbreeding coefficients
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Estimators for pairwise relatedness and individual inbreeding coefficients
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Estimators for pairwise relatedness and individual inbreeding coefficients
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

References

Hide All
Barbujani, G., (1987). Autocorrelation of gene frequencies under isolation by distance. Genetics 117, 777782.
Brown, A. H. D., Barrett, S. C. H., & Moran, G. F., (1985). Mating system estimation in forest trees: models, methods and meanings. In Population Genetics in Forestry, Lecture notes in Biomathematics (ed. Levin, S.), 60, 3249.
Chakraborty, R., Meagher, T. R., & Smouse, P. E., (1988). Parentage analysis with genetic markers in natural populations. I. The expected proportion of offspring with unambiguous paternity. Genetics 118, 527536.
Cotterman, C. W., (1940). A Calculus for Slatistico-genetics. Unpublished thesis, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Curie-Cohen, M., (1981). Estimates of inbreeding in a natural population: a comparison of sampling properties. Genetics 100, 339358.
Crow, J. F., & Kimura, M., (1970). An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. Burgess, Minneapolis.
Cruzan, M., (1996). Genetic markers in plant evolutionary biology. Ecology (in the Press).
Emigh, T. H., (1980). A comparison of tests for Hardy—Weinberg equilibrium. Biometrics 36, 627642.
Epperson, B. K., (1989). Spatial patterns of genetic variation within plant populations. In Plant Population Genetics Breeding, and Genetic Resources (ed. Brown, A. H. D., Clegg, M. T., Kahler, A. L. and Weir, B. S.). pp. 229253. Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer Associates.
Grafen, A., (1985). A geometric view of relatedness. Oxford Survey Evolutionary Biology 2, 2889.
Jacquard, A., (1974). The Genetic Structure of Populations. Berlin: Springer.
Li, C. C., & Horvitz, D. G., (1953). Some methods of estimating the inbreeding coefficient. American J. Human Genetics 5, 107117.
Loeselle, B., Sork, V., Nason, J., & Graham, C., (1996). spatial genetic structure of a tropical understory shrub, Psychotria officinalis (Rubiaceae). American Journal of Botany (in the Press).
Lynch, M., (1988). Estimation of relatedness by DNA fingerprinting. Molecular Biology and Evolution 5, 584599.
Malecot, G., (1969). The Mathematics of Relationship. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Michod, R. D., & Hamilton, W. D., (1980). Coefficients of relatedness in sociobiology. Nature 288, 694697.
Morton, N. E., Yee, S., Harris, D. E., & Lew, R., (1971). Bioassay of kinship. Theoreticul Population Biology 2, 507524.
Pamilo, P., & Crozier, R. H., (1982). Measuring genetic relatedness in natural populations: methodology. Theoretical Population Biology 21, 171193.
Park, S. K., & Miller, K. W., (1988). Random number generators: good ones are hard to find. Communications of ACM 31, 11921201.
Queller, D. C., & Goodnight, K. F., (1989). Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution 43, 258275.
Ritland, K., (1996 a). A marker-based method for inferences about quantitative inheritance in natural populations. Evolution (in the Press).
Ritland, K., (1996 b). Estimation of individual population divergence, a component of genetic diversity. (Submitted to) Molecular Ecology.
Ritland, K., & Ritland, C., (1996). Inferences about quantitative inheritance based upon natural population structure in the common yellow monkeyflower, Mimulus guttatus. Evolution (in the Press).
Robertson, A., & Hill, W. G., (1984). Deviations from Hardy—Weinberg proportions: sampling variances and use in estimation of inbreeding coefficients. Genetics 107, 703718.
Schuster, W. S. F., & Mitton, J. B., (1991). Relatedness within clusters of a bird-dispersed pine and the potential for kin interactions. Heredity 67, 4148.
Thompson, E. A., (1975). The estimation of pairwise relationships. Annals of Human Genetics 39, 173188.
Thompson, E. A., (1976). Inference of genealogical structure. Social Sciences Information 15, 477526.
Weir, B. S., & Cockerham, C. C., (1984). Estimating Fstatistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38, 13581370.
Weir, B. S., (1990). Genetic Data Analysis. Sunderland, MA.: Sinauer Associates.
Wilkinson, G. S., & McCracken, G. F., (1986). On estimating relatedness using genetics markers. Evolution 39, 11691174.
Wright, S., (1922). Coefficients of inbreeding and relationship. American Naturalist 56, 330338.
Wright, S., (1943). Isolation by distance. Genetics 28, 114138.
Wright, S., (1969). Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, vol. 2. The theory of gene frequencies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Yasuda, N., (1968). Estimation of the inbreeding coefficient from phenotypic frequencies by a method of maximum likelihood scoring. Biometrics 24, 915935.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed