Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T09:40:26.427Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bare-patches, a new sex-linked gene in the mouse, associated with a high production of XO females: II. Investigations into the nature and mechanism of the XO production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Rita J. S. Phillips  and
M. H. Kaufman
Rita J. S. Phillips
Affiliation:
M.R.C. Radiobiology Unit, Harwell, Didcot OX11 0RD, England
M. H. Kaufman
Affiliation:
Physiology Laboratory, Cambridge, England
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The high XO production in Bpa+ mouse stocks appears to be due, not to Bpa itself, but to a closely linked factor for high XO production (Fxo) which may be a gene or a chromosomal aberration. The change of Bpa Fxo to Bpa non-Fxo occurs with a frequency of about 6%; the reciprocal change from Bpa Fxo to Fxo non-Bpa has not been found. There is some evidence that Fxo might involve a structural alteration such as an inversion or a deletion. The X-chromosome loss is due to non-disjunction which occurs in about one-third of the oocytes, probably mainly at meiosis I. Frequencies of other chromosomal abnormalities found in the stocks are given.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , August 1974 , pp. 27 - 41
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

References

REFERENCES

Carter, T. C. (1951). The position of fidget in linkage group V of the mouse. Journal of Genetics 50, 264–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattanach, B. M. (1966). The location of Cattanach's translocation in the X-chromosome linkage map of the mouse. Genetical Research 8, 253–256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cattanach, B. M. & Isaacson, J. H. (1967). Controlling elements in the mouse X chromosome. Genetics 57, 331–346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cattanach, B. M. & Moseley, H. J. (1973). Crossover suppression in heterozygotes for tobacco metacentric chromosomes. Mouse News Letter 49, 30.Google Scholar
Cattanach, B. M. & Williams, C. E. (1972). Evidence of non-random X-chromosome activity in the mouse. Genetical Research 19, 229–240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, J. H. (1971). On the distribution of phenotypes in XXY males and their parents. Journal of Medical Genetics 8, 434–437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ford, C. E., Searle, A. G., Evans, E. P. & West, J. B. (1969). Differential transmission of translocations induced in spermatogonia of mice by irradiation. Cytogenetics 8, 447–470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fredga, K. (1964). A simple technique for demonstration of the chromosomes and mitotic stages in a mammal. Chromosomes from the cornea. Heriditas (Lund) 51, 268–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, S. A. & Edwards, R. G. (1968). Chiasma frequency and maternal age in mammals. Nature 218, 22–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaufman, M. H. (1973 a). Parthenogenesis in the mouse. Nature 242, 475–476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaufman, M. H. (1973 b). Timing of the first cleavage division of haploid mouse eggs, and the duration of its component stages. Journal of Cell Science 13, 553–566.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaufman, M. H. & Surani, M. A. H. (1974). The effect of osmolarity on mouse parthenogenesis. Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology. (In the Press.)Google ScholarPubMed
Léonard, A. & Schröder, J. H. (1968). Incidence of XO mice after X-irradiation of spermatogonia. Molecular and General Genetics 101, 116–119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyon, M. F. & Newport, P. R. (1973). Crossover-suppression in T(4; 6) 2 Bnr. Mouse News Letter 49, 30.Google Scholar
Phillips, R. J. S., Hawker, S. G. & Moseley, H. J. (1973). Bare-patches, a new sex-linked gene in the mouse, associated with a high production of XO females. I. A preliminary report of breeding experiments. Genetical Research 22, 91–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roderick, T. H. & Hawes, N. L. (1970). Two radiation-induced chromosomal inversions in mice (Mus musculus). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 67, 961–967.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russell, L. B. (1961). Genetics of mammalian sex chromosomes. Science 133, 1795–1803.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russell, L. B. (1968). The use of sex-chromosome anomalies for measuring radiation effects in different germ-cell stages of the mouse. In Effects of Radiation on Meiotic Systems, pp. 27–41. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna.Google Scholar
Russell, L. B. & Montgomery, C. L. (1966). Radiation sensitivity differences within cell-division cycles during mouse cleavage. International Journal of Radiation Biology 10, 151–164.Google ScholarPubMed
Wallace, M. E. (1972). Reduction in recombination due to a deletion in a colony of wild mice. Journal of Heredity 63, 297–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar