Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T21:13:26.871Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Central banking in nineteenth-century Belgium: was the NBB a lender of last resort?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2008

Erik Buyst  and
Ivo Maes
Erik Buyst
Affiliation:
University of Leuven and National Bank of BelgiumErik.buyst@econ.kuleuven.beandivo.maes@nbb.be
Ivo Maes
Affiliation:
University of Leuven and National Bank of BelgiumErik.buyst@econ.kuleuven.beandivo.maes@nbb.be
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The creation of the National Bank of Belgium (NBB) in 1850 marked a fundamental reform of the Belgian financial system. It clearly aimed at rendering the financial system more crisis resistant, especially by restricting the leverage of the banking sector. The NBB, which received the privilege to issue banknotes, was subject to strict rules to grant only short-term credit against collateral. The NBB took up a key role in maintaining monetary stability, especially by safeguarding the convertibility of banknotes. The NBB also took part in certain rescue operations of financial institutions. However, this was mostly on explicit demand from the finance minister and for crises concerning discount banks. It would then be an exaggeration to consider it as a lender of last resort, in the sense of taking responsibility for the stability of the financial system. This should be no surprise, given the limitations imposed by its statutes, especially the limitation to short-term credits and the strict rules on collateral, the role of the profit motive in its commercial activities and the priority for safeguarding the convertibility of banknotes.

Résumés

La création de la Banque Nationale de Belgique (BNB) en 1850 a marqué une réforme fondamentale du système financier belge. Elle a clairement eu pour but de rendre le système financier plus résistent aux crises, spécialement en restreignant l'influence du secteur bancaire. La BNB, qui avait reçu le privilège d'émettre des billets de banque, était sujette à des règles strictes de n'accorder des crédits à court terme que contre nantissement. La BNB a joué un rôle clé dans le maintien de la stabilité monétaire, en particulier dans la sauvegarde de la convertibilité des billets. La BNB a aussi pris part à certaines opérations de sauvetage d'institutions financières. Cependant, c'était surtout à la demande explicite du ministre des finances et pour les crises concernant les banques d'escompte. Il serait donc exagéré de la considérer comment prêteur de dernier ressort, c'est-à-dire en étant responsable de la stabilité du système financier. Ce qui ne constitue pas une surprise, étant données les limitations imposées par ses réglementa, en particulier la limitation des crédits à court terme et les règles strictes sur le nantissement, le rôle du motif des profits dans ses activités commerciales et la priorité de sauvegarde de la convertibilité des billets.

Abstrakte

Die Schaffung der Belgischen Nationalbank (NBB) im Jahre 1850 signalisierte eine fundamentale Reform des belgischen Finanzsystems. Sie zielte deutlich daraufhin ab, das Finanzsystem krisenresistenter zu machen, insbesondere durch die Beschränkung des Verschuldungsgrads des Banksektors. Die NBB, die das Privileg zur Herausgabe von Banknoten erhielt, unterlag strengsten Regelungen die ihr nur gestatteten, kurzfristige Kredite gegen entsprechende Sicherheiten zu gewähren. Die NBB nahm eine wichtige Stellung bei der Aufrechterhaltung der Währungsstabilität ein – insbesondere dadurch, dass sie die Konvertierbarkeit der Banknoten absicherte. Die NBB beteiligte sich ebenfalls an bestimmten Rettungsoperationen für Finanzinstitute. Dies erfolgte jedoch meist auf ausdrückliche Anweisung des Finanzministers und bei Krisen, die Diskontbanken betrafen. Es wäre daher übertrieben, sie als “Kreditgeber letzter Instanz” zu bezeichnen, wenn man diesen Begriff in dem Sinne interpretiert, dass eine Verantwortung für die Stabilität des Finanzsystems übernommen wird. Dies dürfte keine Überraschung sein, wenn man die Beschränkungen berücksichtigt, die der Bank durch ihre Statute auferlegt wurden – insbesondere die Beschränkung auf kurzfristige Kredite und die strengen Vorgaben in Bezug auf Sicherheiten, die Rolle, die das Gewinnmotiv in ihrer gewerblichen Aktivität spielte und die Priorität, die Konvertierbarkeit von Banknoten abzusichern.

Resúmenes

a creación del Banco Nacional de Bélgica en 1850 estableció una reforma fundamental en el sistema financiero belga. Claramente se proponía hacer que el sistema financiero fuese más resistente a la crisis, especialmente con la restricción del apalancamiento del sector bancario. El BNB recibió el privilegio de emitir billetes, fue sujeto a normas estrictas para condecer solo crédito a corto plazo a cambio de garantía. El BNB desempeñó un papel clave en el mantenimiento de la estabilidad monetaria, especialmente al salvaguardar la conversión de los billetes. El BNB también participó en ciertas operaciones de rescate de instituciones financieras. Sin embargo, esto fue debido principalmente a la explícita petición del Ministro de Finanzas y a las crisis que concernían a los bancos de descuento. Sería entonces una exageración considerarlo prestamista como último recurso, en el sentido de asumir la responsabilidad de la estabilidad del sistema financiero. Esto no debería sorprendernos, dadas las restricciones impuestas por los estatutos, especialmente la restricción de crédito a corto plazo y las estrictas normas de garantía, la función del motivo en las ganancias en sus actividades comerciales y la prioridad de salvaguardar la conversión de los billetes.

Type
Articles
Information
Financial History Review , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , October 2008 , pp. 153 - 173
Copyright
Copyright © European Association for Banking and Financial History e.V. 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The authors would like to thank all those who contributed to this project, especially J. Abraham, S. Bertholomé, A. De Schepper, S. Lazaretou, Ph. Lefèvre, K. Oosterlinck, L. Quaglia, A. Suvantti, J. Tarkka, C. Van Nieuwenhuyze and the participants in seminars at the Bank of Finland, the Second Economic History Panel (PPP2, Bank of England and CEPR) and the Second Conference of Southeast Europe Monetary History Network (ONB, Vienna). The usual caveats apply.

2 Houben, A., Kakes, J. and Schinasi, G., Towards a Framework for Financial Stability, Occasional Studies, vol. ii (Amsterdam, 2004)Google Scholar; Oosterloo, S. and de Haan, J., ‘Central banks and financial stability: a survey’, Journal of Financial Stability, 1 (2004), pp. 257–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Lamfalussy, A., ‘Globalization of financial markets: international supervisory and regulatory issues’, in Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Financial Market Volatility (Kansas City, 1988), pp. 133–40Google Scholar.

3 Capie, F., ‘Banking in Europe in the nineteenth century: the role of the central bank’, in Silla, R., Tilly, R. and Tortella, G. (eds.), The State, the Financial System and Economic Modernization (Cambridge, 1999), p. 130Google Scholar.

4 Kauch, P., La Banque Nationale de Belgique, 1850–1918 (Brussels, 1950), pp. 77 and 172Google Scholar.

5 Bordo, M., ‘The lender of last resort: alternative views and historical experience’, in Goodhart, C. and Illing, G. (eds.), Financial Crises, Contagion, and the Lender of Last Resort (Oxford, 2002), pp. 109–25Google Scholar.

6 Buyst, E., Maes, I. and Pluym, W., The Bank, the Franc and the Euro: a History of the National Bank of Belgium (Tielt, 2005), pp. 77–8Google Scholar.

7 See the various contributions in Goodhart, C. and Illing, G. (eds.), Financial Crises, Contagion, and the Lender of Last Resort (Oxford, 2002)Google Scholar, and Humphrey, T. M., ‘Lender of last resort’, in Newman, P., Milgate, M. and Eatwell, J. (eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Money and Finance (London, 1992), pp. 571–3Google Scholar.

8 Following Goodhart, C., ‘Myths about the lender of last resort’, in Goodhart, C. and Illing, G. (eds.), Financial Crises, Contagion, and the Lender of Last Resort (Oxford, 2002), p. 231Google Scholar, we consider a general liquidity shock as a monetary disturbance. It can be countered by the central bank by providing more (or less) liquidity to the market as a whole.

9 European Central Bank, ‘The EU arrangements for financial crisis management’, Monthly Bulletin, 2 (February 2007), p. 80.

10 Capie, ‘Banking in Europe in the nineteenth century’, p. 118. See also Capie, F. and Goodhart, C., ‘Central banks, macro policy, and the financial system: the nineteenth and twentieth centuries’, Financial History Review, 2 (1995), pp. 145–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Goodhart, C., The Evolution of Central Banks, 2nd edition (London, 1985)Google Scholar.

11 The official name was ‘Société Générale pour favoriser l'industrie nationale’. It should not be confused with its French namesake.

12 See Laureyssens, J., ‘The Société Générale and the origin of industrial investment banking’, Revue belge d'histoire contemporaine, 6 (1975), pp. 93–115Google Scholar and Kindleberger, C. P., A Financial History of Western Europe, 2nd edition (New York and Oxford, 1993), p. 106Google Scholar.

13 See Brion, R. and Moreau, J.-L., La Société Générale de Belgique, 1822-1997 (Antwerp, 1998)Google Scholar and Gille, B. (ed.), Lettres adressées à la Maison Rothschild de Paris par son représentant à Bruxelles, vol. 1: Crise politique et crise financière en Belgique, 1838–1840, Centre Interuniversitaire d'Histoire Contemporaine, Cahiers xix (Leuven and Paris, 1961)Google Scholar.

14 Moniteur belge, 28 December 1838 and 2 January 1839. By comparison: total central government expenditure in 1838 (excluding ‘credits spéciaux’) amounted up to 97 million BEF (Pirard, J., L'extension du rôle de l'Etat en Belgique aux xixe et xxe siècles, Histoire quantitative et développement de la Belgique aux xixe et xxe siècles, vol. vii-2 (Brussels, 1999), p. 835Google Scholar).

15 Compte rendu de la Société Générale. Année 1838.

16 Lebrun, P. et al. , Essai sur la revolution industrielle en Belgique, 1770–1847, 2nd edition (Brussels, 1981)Google Scholar.

17 Chlepner, B. S., La banque en Belgique. Etude historique et économique (Brussels, 1926)Google Scholar and ‘A propos d'un centenaire. La première crise bancaire en Belgique’, Bulletin d'information et de documentation de la Banque Nationale de Belgique, 12 (1939), pp. 9–16.

18 Compte rendu de la Société Générale. Année 1848.

19 Belgium and France de facto formed a monetary union. So there was a serious danger that Belgian specie would be drained massively towards France (Janssens, V., Le franc belge: un siècle et demi d'histoire monétaire (Brussels, 1976))Google Scholar. In 1865 Belgium joined the Latin monetary union (Flandreau, M., The Glitter of Gold: France, Bimetallism, and the Emergence of the International Gold Standard (1848–1873) (Oxford, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar).

20 Letter of 18 March 1848 from the Société Générale to the government (printed in Annales parlementaires de Belgique, 20 March 1848).

21 Moniteur belge, 21 March 1848. By comparison: total central government expenditure in 1848 – excluding ‘credits spéciaux’ – amounted up to 126 million BEF (Pirard, L'extension du rôle de l'Etat, p. 835.)

22 Pluymers, B., De Belgische industriële revolutie. Reconstructie van een databank van de fysieke produktie en de bruto-toegevoegde waarde, Workshop on Quantitative Economic History, Research Paper 92.01 (Leuven, 1992), p. 27Google Scholar.

23 See Houtman-De Smedt, H., ‘Société Générale from 1822 to 1848: from bank of the crown lands to mixed-type bank’, in Buyst, E. et al. (eds.), The General Bank, 1822–1997 (Tielt, 1997), pp. 13–63Google Scholar; Luyten, D., ‘Pressiegroepen in de eerste helft van de negentiende eeuw. Een concreet geval: de Société Générale tijdens de financiële crisis van 1848’, Revue belge d'histoire contemporaine, 17 (1986), pp. 127–62Google Scholar.

24 Moniteur belge, 23 May 1848.

25 Walthère Frère-Orban was finance minister from 1848 to 1852 and from 1857 to 1867. He combined the positions of ‘prime’ minister and finance minister in the years 1868–70. In the period 1878–84 he was again ‘prime’ minister.

26 Frère-Orban had also studied in Paris.

27 Vanthoor, W., De Nederlandsche Bank (1814–1998): van Amsterdamse kredietinstelling naar Europese stelselbank (Amsterdam, 2004)Google Scholar.

28 See Van Der Wee, H. and Verbreyt, M., The Generale Bank, 1822–1997. A Continuing Challenge (Tielt, 1997)Google Scholar, and Brion and Moreau, La Société Générale de Belgique.

29 Agreements of 15 and 18 December 1849 between the finance minister and respectively the Banque de Belgique and the Société Générale (printed in Banque Nationale de Belgique, Lois organiques, statuts et règlement d'ordre intérieur. Recueil des documents et discussions parlementaires concernant l'institution de la Banque Nationale (Brussels, 1916), pp. 131–41). In 1900 the name was officially changed into Banque Nationale de Belgique/Nationale Bank van België. As the institution today still carries that name, we use the term National Bank of Belgium or NBB also for the nineteenth century.

30 Kauch, La Banque Nationale de Belgique, p. 99.

31 Discussion du projet de loi relatif à l'institution d'une Banque Nationale. Chambre des Représentants, Session of 28 February 1850 (Lois organiques, statuts, p. 198). This had happened to the Société Générale in the 1820s. In that period the Société Générale became heavily involved in the public finances of the United Kingdom of the Netherlands which undermined confidence in its banknotes (Houtman-De Smedt, ‘Société Générale’).

32 Moniteur belge, 16 May 1850 and 5 September 1850.

33 ‘Exposé des motifs du projet de loi concernant l'institution d'une Banque Nationale’, in Lois organiques, statuts, p. 78.

34 ‘Exposé des motifs’, p. 51.

35 When the NBB opened its doors on 2 January 1851 the discount houses of Brussels, Tournai and Verviers stopped their activities.

36 This is clearly different from the situation in Britain. The Banking Act of 1844 in England created an inelastic system of note issue. As a result deposit currency became the principal medium of circulation. In Belgium, on the contrary, banknotes became the main medium of circulation. Few persons had deposit accounts, especially before World War I. Even important commercial and industrial companies effected most of their payments by means of banknotes. Also operations between brokers on the Stock Exchange were liquidated through banknotes and not by the use of cheques (Chlepner, B. S., Belgian Banking and Banking Theory (Washington, DC, 1943)Google Scholar).

37 Archives of the NBB, A589/14, Circulaire du 14 juillet 1870 aux comptoirs.

38 See Kauch, La Banque Nationale de Belgique, pp. 152–65 and Kurgan-Van Hentenryk, G., ‘The Société Générale, 1850–1934’, in Buyst, E. et al. (eds.), The Generale Bank, 1822–1997 (Tielt, 1997), pp. 65–286Google Scholar.

39 Archives of the NBB, A589/14: Circulaires du 19 et du 29 juillet 1870 aux comptoirs.

40 Kauch, La Banque Nationale de Belgique, p. 168.

41 This was also true for the Bank of England until about 1870 (Collins, M., ‘The Bank of England as lender of last resort, 1857–1878’, Economic History Review, 45 (1992), pp. 145–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar).

42 Van Schoubroeck, A., L'évolution des banques belges en function de la conjuncture de 1850 à 1872 (Gembloux, 1951)Google Scholar.

43 Moniteur belge, 14 December 1857.

44 Archives of the NBB, Conseil d'administration, 12 December 1857.

45 Kindleberger, C. P., Manias, Panics and Crashes: a History of Financial Crises, 4th edition (New York, 2000)Google Scholar.

46 Moniteur belge, 1 August 1866.

47 Echoes of the crisis are found in the archives of the NBB, see e.g. Conseil général, 25 August and 29 September 1866.

48 Chlepner, B. S., Le marché financier belge depuis cent ans (Brussels, 1930)Google Scholar.

49 As the controlled banks were separate legal entities, the agreement of 18 December 1849 did not apply. For more information about the emergence and development of the system of controlled banks, see e.g. Kurgan-van Hentenryk, ‘The Société Générale’, and Van der Wee and Verbreyt, The Generale Bank.

50 Buyst, Maes and Pluym, The Bank, the Franc and the Euro, pp. 76–9.

51 Kauch, La Banque Nationale de Belgique, pp. 261–2.

52 Jules Malou was finance minister from 1845 to 1847 and from 1871 to 1874. He combined the position of ‘prime’ minister and finance minister from 1874 to 1878 and in 1884. Between 1848 and 1870 he was director and in 1871 vice-governor of the Société Générale. In that capacity he was the driving force behind a broadening of the Société Générale's activities, e.g. into the construction and exploitation of railways both in Belgium and abroad (Brion and Moreau, La Société Générale and Kurgan-van Hentenryk, G., ‘Finance et politique: le ‘purgatoire’ de Jules Malou à la Société Générale', in Art, J. and François, L. (eds.), Docendo discimus. Liber amicorum Romain Van Eenoo (Ghent, 1999), vol. ii, pp. 1065–82Google Scholar).

53 For the causes of these prolonged economic difficulties, see e.g. Buyst, E. and van Meerten, M. A., ‘The Société Générale and Belgian Economic development’, Buyst, E. et al. (eds.), The Generale Bank, 1822–1997 (Tielt, 1997), pp. 533–95Google Scholar.

54 Durviaux, R., La banque mixte. Origine et soutien de l'expansion économique en Belgique, Collection de l'école des sciences économiques, no. 33 (Brussels, 1947)Google Scholar and Kurgan-Van Hentenryk, G., Rail, finance et politique. Les entreprises Philippart (1865–1890) (Brussels, 1982)Google Scholar. As indicated earlier, the other major crises of the Belgian banking system occurred in 1838–9 and 1848.

55 Kauch, La Banque Nationale de Belgique, pp. 192–3.

56 Durviaux, La banque mixte.

57 Archives of the NBB, Conseil d'administration, 17 October 1872; Archives of the NBB, C827 ‘Banque de l'Union’: agreement between the NBB and the Comptoir Spécial d'Escompte of 21 December 1872. For more details about the Société Générale's role, see Crombois, J.-F., ‘Les activités bancaires de la Société Générale de Belgique 1870–1914. Facteurs de développement d'une grande banque mixte belge’, Revue belge d'histoire contemporaine, 25 (1994–5), pp. 1–29Google Scholar.

58 Archives of the NBB, Conseil d'administration, 14 and 21 December 1876.

59 Kauch, La Banque Nationale de Belgique, p. 159 makes a comparison between Malou and Bagehot, criticising also the old-fashioned orthodoxy of the NBB.

60 The estimated losses linked to fraud alone amounted to 24 million francs. This came on top of the huge losses incurred with the bankruptcy of the Philippart empire (Kurgan-van Hentenryk, Rail, finance et politique).

61 Durviaux, La Banque mixte.

62 See Goodhart, The Evolution of Central Banks and A. Plessis, ‘La création de la Banque de France et la génèse des banques nationales d’émission en Europe au xixe siècle', in Feiertag, O. and Margairaz, M. (eds.), Politiques et pratiques d'émission en Europe (xviie-xxe siècle) (Paris, 2003), pp. 25–51Google Scholar.

63 Kauch, La Banque Nationale de Belgique, pp. 238–9 and Buyst, E. and Maes, I., ‘Monetary policy controversies and the creation of economics departments at central banks: the case of Belgium’, in Asso, P. F. and Fiorito, L. (eds.), Economics and Institutions. Contributions from the History of Economic Thought (Milan, 2007), pp. 146-7Google Scholar. This view is confirmed by the nature of the discussions in the Conseil d'administration.

64 For more details see Crombois, ‘Les activités bancaires’, and Kurgan-van Hentenryk, ‘The Société Générale’.