Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Preterm labour in multiple pregnancies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2008


James P Neilson
Affiliation:
Royal Liverpool University Hospital, UK
Caroline A Crowther
Affiliation:
University of Adelaide, South Australia

Extract

Multiple pregnancy is associated with a high rate of perinatal loss – mainly due to preterm labour but with important contributions from fetal malformation, intrauterine growth retardation and twin-twin transfusion syndrome. The overall perinatal mortality rate is consistently around six times that of singleton pregnancies but the rate rises progressively with the number of fetuses. Rates of 63,164,200,214 and 416 per 1000 births have been recently reported for twins, triplets, quadruplets, quintuplets and sextuplets respectively. In addition to these alarming figures, it should be emphasized that the restricted concept of perinatal mortality obscures the real extent of loss. If we include late abortion (after 20 weeks), late neonatal deaths and deaths in infancy from perinatal causes, as well as the usual indices of perinatal mortality (stillbirths and early neonatal deaths) we find that the total loss rate from twin pregnancy alone doubles and may be close to 10%. Although the rate of loss from multiple pregnancies is now substantially higher than that associated with the pregnancies of diabetic women, the challenge of multiple pregnancy has not been met with the same commitment or organisation of specialized perinatal services as has diabetes.


Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

1Redford, DHA, Whitfield, CR. The outcome of twin pregnancy in Glasgow 1981–1982. Unpublished data 1983.Google Scholar
2 Information and Statistics Division (ISD). Scottish Stillbirth and Neonatal Death Report 1991. Edinburgh: Common Services Agency for Scottish Health Service, 1992.Google Scholar
3Botting, BH, McDonald-Davies, I, McFarlane, AJ. Recent trends in the incidence of multiple births and associated mortality. Arch Dis Child 1987; 62: 941–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4 Interim Licensing Authority (ILA). The fifth report of the Interim Licensing Authority for Human in Vitro Fertilization and Embryology. London: MRC/RCOG, 1990.Google Scholar
5Levene, MI, Wild, J, Steer, P. Higher multiple births and the modern management of infertility in Britain. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992; 99: 607–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Crowther, CA. Multiple pregnancy: including delivery. In: James, DK, Steer, PJ, Weiner, CP, Gouik, B eds. High Risk Pregnancy Management Options. London: Saunders, 1993: in press.Google Scholar
7Neilson, JP. Multiple pregnancy. In: Whitfield, CR ed. Dewhurst’s Textbook of Obstetrics and Gynaecology for Postgraduates. Oxford: Blackwell’s, 1993: in press.Google Scholar
8Neilson, JP. Prenatal diagnosis in multiple pregnancies. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 1992; 4: 280–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Neilson, JP. Fetal assessment in multiple pregnancies. In: Ratnam, SS, Ng, S-C, Arulkumaran, S, Sen, DK eds. Contributions to Obstetrics and Gynaecology 3. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1993: in press.Google Scholar
10Newman, RB, Hamer, C, Miller, MC. Outpatient triplet management: a contemporary review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 547–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Sassoon, DA, Castro, LC, Davis, JL, Hobel, CJ. Perinatal outcome in triplet versus twin gestations. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 75: 817–20.Google ScholarPubMed
12Melgar, CA, Rosenfeld, DL, Rawlinson, K, Greenberg, M. Perinatal outcome after multifetal reduction to twins compared with nonreduced multiple gestations. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 78: 763–67.Google ScholarPubMed
13Anderson, RL, Goldberg, JD, Golbus, MS. Prenatal diagnosis in multiple gestation: 20 years’ experience with amniocentesis. Prenat Diagn 1991; 11: 263–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14Brambati, B, Tului, L, Simoni, G, Travi, M. First-trimester genetic diagnosis in multiple pregnancy: principles and potential pitfalls. Prenat Diagn 1991; 11: 767–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Pergament, E, Schulman, JD, Copeland, K et al. The risk and efficacy of chorionic villus sampling in multiple gestations. Prenat Diagn 1992; 12: 337–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16Porreco, RP, Barton, SM, Haverkamp, AD. Occlusion of umbilical artery in acardiac, acephalic twin. Lancet 1991; 337: 326–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Ash, K, Harman, CR, Gritter, H. TRAP sequence: successful outcome with indomethacin treatment. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 76: 960–62.Google ScholarPubMed
18Ginsberg, NA, Applebaum, M, Rabin, SA, Caffarelli, MA, Kuuspala, M, Daskal, JL et al. Term birth after midtrimester hysterotomy and selective delivery of an acardiac twin. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 167: 3337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Danskin, RH, Neilson, JP. Twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: what are appropriate diagnostic criteria? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 365–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20Mahony, BS, Petty, CN, Nyberg, DA, Luthy, DA, Hickok, DE, Hirsch, JH. The “stuck twin” phenomenon: ultrasonographic findings, pregnancy outcome and management with serial amniocenteses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163: 1513–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21Saunders, NJ, Snijders, RM, Nicolaides, KH. Therapeutic amniocentesis in twin-twin transfusion syndrome appearing in the second trimester of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 166: 820–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Doyle, PE, Beral, V, Botting, B, Wale, CJ. Congenital malformations in twins in England and Wales. J Epidemiol Comm Health 1991; 45: 4348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23Calder, AA, Greer, IA. Physiology of labour. In: Phillipp, E, Setchell, ME eds. Scientific Foundations of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (4th ed). London: Heinemann Medical Books, 1991: 239–53.Google Scholar
24Ledger, WL, Webster, M, Harrison, LP, Anderson, ABM, Turnbull, AC. Increase in cervical extensibility during labour induced after isolation of the cervix from the uterus in pregnant ewes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 151: 397402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25Norman, RJ, Deppe, WM, Coutts, PC et al. Twin pregnancy as a model for studies in fetal cortisol concentrations in labour: relation to prostaglandins, prolactin and ACTH. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1983; 90: 1033–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26Neilson, JP, Verkuyl, DAA, Crowther, CA, Bannerman, C. Preterm labour in twin pregnancies: prediction by cervical assessment. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 72: 719–23.Google ScholarPubMed
27Houlton, MCC, Marivate, M, Philpott, RH. Factors associated with preterm labour and changes in the cervix before labour in twin pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1982; 89: 190–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28Olah, KS, Gee, H. The prevention of preterm delivery – can we afford to continue to ignore the cervix? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992; 99: 278–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29Newman, RB, Godsey, RK, Ellings, JM, Campbell, BA, Eller, DP, Miller, MC. Quantification of cervical change: relationship to preterm delivery in the multifetal gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 264–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30Neilson, JP, Mutambira, M. Coitus, twin pregnancy and preterm labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 160: 416–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31McDuffie, RS, Nelson, GE, Osborn, L et al. Effect of routine cervical examinations at term on premature rupture of the membranes: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 79: 219–22.Google ScholarPubMed
32Michaels, WH, Schrieber, RF, Padgett, RJ, Ager, J, Pieper, D. Ultrasound surveillance of the cervix in twin gestations: management of cervical incompetency. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 78: 739–44.Google ScholarPubMed
33Newman, RB, Gill, PJ, Katz, M. Uterine activity during pregnancy in ambulatory patients: comparison of singleton and twin pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 154: 530–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34Grimes, DA, Schulz, KF. Randomized controlled trials of home uterine activity monitoring: a review and critique. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 79: 137–42.Google ScholarPubMed
35Seukeran, DC, Neilson, JP. Preliminary investigations of Braxton-Hicks contractions. Unpublished data.Google Scholar
36Quilligan, EJ. Pathologic causes of preterm labor. In: Elder, MG, Hendricks, CH eds. Preterm Labor. London: Butterworth, 1981; 6174.Google Scholar
37Neilson, JP, Verkuyl, DAA, Bannerman, C. Tape measurement of symphysis-fundal height in twin pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1988; 95: 1054–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38Redford, DHA. Uterine growth in twin pregnancy by measurement of total intrauterine volume. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 1982; 31: 145–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39Fedrick, J, Anderson, ABM. Factors associated with spontaneous preterm birth. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1976; 83: 342–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40Ghosh, A, Wood, JSK, Rawlinson, HA, Ferguson-Smith, MA. Prognostic significance of raised serum alpha-fetoprotein levels in twin pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1982; 89: 817–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41Redford, DHA, Whitfield, CR. Maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein in twin pregnancies uncomplicated by neural tube defect. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 152: 550–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42Walker, EM, Patel, NB. Maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein, birthweight and perinatal death in twin pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1986; 93: 1191–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43Neilson, JP. Fetal growth in twin pregnancies. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 1988; 37: 3539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44Persson, P, Grennert, L. Towards a normalisation of the outcome of twin pregnancy. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 1979; 28: 341–46.Google Scholar
45Dor, J, Shaler, J, Maschiach, S, Blankstein, J, Serr, DM. Elective cervical suture of twin pregnancies diagnosed ultrasonically in the first trimester following induced ovulation. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1982; 13: 5560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46 MRC Cervical Cerclage Trial. MRC/RCOG Working Party on Cervical Cerlage. Interim report of the Medical Research Council/Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Multicentre Randomised Trial of Cervical Cerclage. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1988; 95: 437–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47Grant, A. Cervical cerclage in twin pregnancy. In: Chalmers, I, ed. Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials Version 1.3. Disk Issue 8, Autumn 1992: Record 3280. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
48Mathews, DD, Fried, JB, Michael, CA. A double-blind trial of oral isoxsuprine in the prevention of premature labour. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 1967; 74: 6870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
49Cetrulo, CL, Freeman, RK. Ritodrine HCI for the prevention of premature labour in twin pregnancies. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 1976; 25: 321–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
50Marivate, M, DeVilliers, KQ, Fairbrother, P. Effect of prophylactic outpatient administration of fenoterol on the time and onset of spontaneous labor and fetal growth rate in twin pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1977; 128: 707708.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
51O’Connor, MC, Murphy, H, Dalrymple, IJ. Double blind trial of ritodrine and placebo in twin pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1979; 86: 706709.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
52Skjaerris, J, Aberg, A. Prevention of prematurity in twin pregnancy by orally administered terbutaline. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1982; 108: 3940.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
53Gummerus, M, Halonen, O. Prophylactic long-term oral tocolysis of multiple pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1987; 94: 249–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
54Ashworth, MF, Spooner, SF, Verkuyl, DAA, Waterman, R, Ashurst, HM. Failure to prevent preterm labour and delivery in twin pregnancy using prophylactic oral salbutamol. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990; 97: 878–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
55Keirse, MJNC. Prophylactic oral betamimetics in twin pregnancies. In: Chalmers, I, ed. Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials Version 1.3. Disk Issue 7, Spring 1992: Record 3462. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
56Katz, VL, Seeds, JW. Fetal and neonatal cardiovascular complications from ²-sympathomimetic therapy for tocolysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
57Keirse, MJNC, Grant, A, King, JF. Preterm labour. In: Chalmers, I, Enkin, M, Keirse, MJNC eds. Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989: 694745.Google Scholar
58Katz, M, Robertson, PA, Creasy, RK. Cardiovascular complications associated with terbutaline treatment for preterm labour. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981; 139: 605608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
59Gerson, A, Abbasi, S, Johnson, A et al. Safety and efficacy of long-term tocolysis with indomethacin. Am J Perinat 1990; 7: 7174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
60Keirse, MJNC. Indomethacin tocolysis in preterm labour. In: Chalmers, I ed. Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials Version 1.2. Disk Issue 4, August 1990: Record 4383. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
61Moise, KJ, Ou, CN, Kirshon, B et al. Placental transfer of indomethacin in the human pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 549–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
62Morales, WJ, Smith, SG, Angel, JL et al. Efficacy and safety of indomethacin versus ritodrine in the management of preterm labor: a randomized study. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 74: 567–72.Google ScholarPubMed
63Moise, KJ, Huhta, JC, Sharif, DS et al. Indomethacin in the treatment of premature labor. Effects on the ductus arteriosus. N Eng J Med 1988; 319: 327–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
64Goldenberg, RL, Davis, RO, Baker, RC. Indomethacin-induced oligohydramnios. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 160: 1196–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
65Van der Heijden, AJ, Provoost, AP, Nauta, J et al. Indomethacin as an inhibitor of preterm labor. Contrib Nephrol 1988; 67: 152–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
66Edwards, AD, Wyatt, JS, Richardson, C et al. Effects of indomethacin on cerebral haemodynamics in very preterm infants. Lancet 1990; 335: 1491–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
67Mari, G, Moise, KJ, Deter, R et al. Doppler assessment of the pulsatility index of the middle cerebral artery during vasoconstriction of the fetal ductus arteriosus after indomethacin therapy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 1528–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
68Russell, JK. Maternal and foetal hazards associated with twin pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Empire 1952; 59: 208–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
69Patel, N, Barrie, W, Campbell, D, Howat, R, Melrose, E, Redford, D et al. Scottish twin study 1983: Preliminary report. Greater Glasgow Health Board. University of Glasgow, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.Google Scholar
70Rosen, EL. Concerns of an obstetric patient experiencing long term hospitalisation. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 1975; 4: 1519.Google Scholar
71White, M, Ritchie, J. Psychological stressors in antepartum hospitalisation: reports of pregnant women. Matern Child Nurs J 1984; 13: 4756.Google ScholarPubMed
72Crowther, CA, Chalmers, I. Bed rest and hospitalisation during pregnancy. In: Chalmers, I, Enkin, M, Keirse, MJNC eds. Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989: 624–32.Google Scholar
73Saunders, MC, Dick, J, Brown, IM et al. The effects of hospital admission for bed rest on the duration of twin pregnancy: a randomized trial. Lancet 1985; 2: 793–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
74Crowther, CA. Hospitalisation for bed rest in twin pregnancy. In: Chalmers, I ed. Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials Version 1.3. Disk Issue 8, Autumn 1992: Record 3376. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
75Hartikainen-Sorri, AL, Joupila, P. Is routine hospitalization needed in antenatal care of twin pregnancy? J Perinat Med 1984; 12: 3134.Google ScholarPubMed
76McLennan, AH, Green, RC, O’Shea, R et al. Routine hospital admission in twin pregnancy between 26 and 30 weeks’ gestation. Lancet 1990; 335: 267–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
77Crowther, CA, Verkuyl, DAA, Neilson, JP et al. The effects of hospitalization for rest on fetal growth, neonatal morbidity and length of gestation in twin pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990; 97: 872–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
78Crowther, CA, Neilson, JP, Verkuyl, DAA et al. Preterm labour in twin pregnancies: can it be prevented by hospital admission? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989; 96: 850–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
79Crowther, CA, Verkuyl, DAA, Ashworth, M, Bannerman, C, Ashurst, H. The effects of hospitalisation for bed rest on duration of gestation, fetal growth and neonatal morbidity in triplet pregnancy. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 1991; 40: 6368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
80Crowley, P. Corticosteroids prior to preterm delivery. In: Chalmers, I ed. Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials Version 1.3. Disk Issue 8, Autumn 1992: Record 2955. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
81Burkitt, G, Baner, CR, Morrison, JC, Cuet, LB. Effect of prenatal dexamethasone administration on prevention of respiratory distress syndrome in twin pregnancies. J Perinatol 1986; 6: 304308.Google Scholar
82Crowley, P. Promoting pulmonary maturity. In: Chalmers, I, Enkin, M, Keirse, MJNC eds. Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989; 746–64.Google Scholar
83Crowther, CA, Grant, AM. Antenatal thyrotrophin-releasing hormone prior to preterm delivery. In: Chalmers, I ed. Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials Version 1.3. Disk Issue 8, Autumn 1992: Record 4749. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
84Rabinovici, J, Barhair, G, Reichman, B, Serr, DM, Mashiach, S. Internal podalic version with unruptured membranes for the second twin in transverse lie. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 71: 428–30.Google ScholarPubMed
85Wittmann, BK, Farquharson, D, Wong, GP, Baldwin, V, Wadsworth, LD, Elit, L. Delayed delivery of the second twin: report of four cases and review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 79: 260–63.Google ScholarPubMed

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 2 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 1st December 2020. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Hostname: page-component-6d4bddd689-8whxq Total loading time: 1.004 Render date: 2020-12-01T09:13:46.954Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "0", "openAccess": "0", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags last update: Tue Dec 01 2020 09:01:06 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) Feature Flags: { "metrics": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "peerReview": true, "crossMark": true, "comments": true, "relatedCommentaries": true, "subject": true, "clr": false, "languageSwitch": true }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Preterm labour in multiple pregnancies
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Preterm labour in multiple pregnancies
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Preterm labour in multiple pregnancies
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *