Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

DNA damage checkpoint kinases in cancer

  • Hannah L. Smith (a1), Harriet Southgate (a2), Deborah A. Tweddle (a2) and Nicola J. Curtin (a1)

Abstract

DNA damage response (DDR) pathway prevents high level endogenous and environmental DNA damage being replicated and passed on to the next generation of cells via an orchestrated and integrated network of cell cycle checkpoint signalling and DNA repair pathways. Depending on the type of damage, and where in the cell cycle it occurs different pathways are involved, with the ATM-CHK2-p53 pathway controlling the G1 checkpoint or ATR-CHK1-Wee1 pathway controlling the S and G2/M checkpoints. Loss of G1 checkpoint control is common in cancer through TP53, ATM mutations, Rb loss or cyclin E overexpression, providing a stronger rationale for targeting the S/G2 checkpoints. This review will focus on the ATM-CHK2-p53-p21 pathway and the ATR-CHK1-WEE1 pathway and ongoing efforts to target these pathways for patient benefit.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Author for correspondence: Nicola J. Curtin, E-mail: nicola.curtin@ncl.ac.uk

References

Hide All
1.Weber, AM and Ryan, AJ (2015) ATM and ATR as therapeutic targets in cancer. Pharmacology & Therapeutics 149(Suppl. C), 124138.
2.Maréchal, A and Zou, L (2013) DNA damage sensing by the ATM and ATR kinases. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 5, a012716.
3.Kozlov, SV et al. (2011) Autophosphorylation and ATM activation: additional sites add to the complexity. The Journal of biological chemistry 286, 91079119.
4.Tanya, TP (2015) Mechanisms of ATM activation. Annual Review of Biochemistry 84, 711738.
5.Shiloh, Y and Ziv, Y (2013) The ATM protein kinase: regulating the cellular response to genotoxic stress, and more. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 14, 197.
6.Zannini, L, Delia, D and Buscemi, G (2014) CHK2 Kinase in the DNA damage response and beyond. Journal of Molecular Cell Biology 6, 442457.
7.O'Connell, MJ et al. (1997) Chk1 is a wee1 kinase in the G2 DNA damage checkpoint inhibiting cdc2 by Y15 phosphorylation. The EMBO Journal 16, 545554.
8.Chow, JPH and Poon, RYC (2012) The CDK1 inhibitory kinase MYT1 in DNA damage checkpoint recovery. Oncogene 32, 4778.
9.Kastan, MB et al. (1992) A mammalian cell cycle checkpoint pathway utilizing p53 and GADD45 is defective in ataxia-telangiectasia. Cell 71, 587597.
10.Beamish, H et al. (1996) Defect in multiple cell cycle checkpoints in ataxia-telangiectasia postirradiation. Journal of Biological Chemistry 271, 2048620493.
11.Weber, AM et al. (2016) Phenotypic consequences of somatic mutations in the ataxia-telangiectasia mutated gene in non-small cell lung cancer. Oncotarget 7, 6080760822.
12.Ou, Y-H et al. (2005) P53 C-terminal phosphorylation by CHK1 and CHK2 participates in the regulation of DNA-damage-induced C-terminal acetylation. Molecular Biology of the Cell 16, 16841695.
13.Fischer, M (2017) Census and evaluation of p53 target genes. Oncogene 36, 3943.
14.Wade, M, Wang, YV and Wahl, GM (2010) The p53 orchestra: Mdm2 and Mdmx set the tone. Trends in cell Biology 20, 299309.
15.Roos, WP and Kaina, B (2013) DNA damage-induced cell death: from specific DNA lesions to the DNA damage response and apoptosis. Cancer Letters 332, 237248.
16.Abbas, T and Dutta, A (2009) P21 in cancer: intricate networks and multiple activities. Nature Reviews. Cancer 9, 400414.
17.Waldman, T, Kinzler, KW and Vogelstein, B (1995) P21 Is necessary for the p53-mediated G1 arrest in human cancer cells. Cancer Research 55, 51875190.
18.Deng, C et al. (1995) Mice lacking p21CIP1/WAF1 undergo normal development, but are defective in G1 checkpoint control. Cell 82, 675684.
19.Bieging, KT, Mello, SS and Attardi, LD (2014) Unravelling mechanisms of p53-mediated tumour suppression. Nature reviews. Cancer 14, 359370.
20.Goodarzi, AA, Jeggo, P and Lobrich, M (2010) The influence of heterochromatin on DNA double strand break repair: getting the strong, silent type to relax. DNA Repair 9, 12731282.
21.Goodarzi, AA et al. (2008) ATM signaling facilitates repair of DNA double-strand breaks associated with heterochromatin. Molecular Cell 31, 167177.
22.Scully, R and Xie, A (2013) Double strand break repair functions of histone H2AX. Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis 750, 514.
23.Blackford, AN and Jackson, SP (2017) ATM, ATR, and DNA-PK: the trinity at the heart of the DNA damage response. Molecular Cell 66, 801817.
24.Melander, F et al. (2008) Phosphorylation of SDT repeats in the MDC1 N terminus triggers retention of NBS1 at the DNA damage-modified chromatin. The Journal of Cell Biology 181, 213226.
25.Spycher, C et al. (2008) Constitutive phosphorylation of MDC1 physically links the MRE11–RAD50–NBS1 complex to damaged chromatin. The Journal of Cell Biology 181, 227240.
26.Panier, S and Boulton, SJ (2013) Double-strand break repair: 53BP1 comes into focus. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 15, 7.
27.Greenberg, RA (2008) Recognition of DNA double strand breaks by the BRCA1 tumor suppressor network. Chromosoma 117, 305317.
28.Prakash, R et al. (2015) Homologous recombination and human health: the roles of BRCA1, BRCA2, and associated proteins. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 7, a016600–a00.
29.Chen, X et al. (2011) Cell cycle regulation of DNA double-strand break end resection by Cdk1-dependent Dna2 phosphorylation. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 18, 10151019.
30.Ceccaldi, R, Rondinelli, B and D'Andrea, AD (2016) Repair pathway choices and consequences at the double-strand break. Trends in Cell Biology 26, 5264.
31.Jazayeri, A et al. (2006) ATM- and cell cycle-dependent regulation of ATR in response to DNA double-strand breaks. Nature Cell Biology 8, 3745.
32.Myers, JS and Cortez, D (2006) Rapid activation of ATR by ionizing radiation requires ATM and Mre11. Journal of Biological Chemistry 281, 93469350.
33.Rothblum-Oviatt, C et al. (2016) Ataxia telangiectasia: a review. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 11, 159159.
34.Choi, M, Kipps, T and Kurzrock, R (2016) ATM mutations in cancer: therapeutic implications. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 15, 17811791.
35.Wang, C et al. (2017) ATM-deficient colorectal cancer cells are sensitive to the PARP inhibitor Olaparib(). Translational Oncology 10, 190196.
36.Abdel-Fatah, TMA et al. (2014) Clinicopathological significance of ATM-Chk2 expression in sporadic breast cancers: a comprehensive analysis in large cohorts. Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.) 16, 982991.
37.Petersen, LF et al. (2017) Loss of tumour-specific ATM protein expression is an independent prognostic factor in early resected NSCLC. Oncotarget 8, 3832638336.
38.Villaruz, LC et al. (2016) ATM Protein is deficient in over 40% of lung adenocarcinomas. Oncotarget 7, 5771457725.
39.Russell, R et al. (2015) Loss of ATM accelerates pancreatic cancer formation and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Nature Communications 6, 76777677.
40.Ouillette, P et al. (2010) Aggressive chronic lymphocytic leukemia with elevated genomic complexity is associated with multiple gene defects in the response to DNA double-strand breaks. Clinical Cancer Research 16, 835847.
41.Mlakar, V et al. (2017) 11q Deletion in neuroblastoma: a review of biological and clinical implications. Molecular cancer 16, 114.
42.Laake, K et al. (1999) Loss of heterozygosity at 11q23. 1 and survival in breast cancer: results of a large European study. Genes, Chromosomes and Cancer 25, 212221.
43.Monni, O and Knuutila, S (2001) 11q deletions in hematological malignancies. Leukemia & Lymphoma 40, 259266.
44.Cybulski, C et al. (2004) CHEK2 Is a multiorgan cancer susceptibility gene. American Journal of Human Genetics 75, 11311135.
45.Lee, SB et al. (2001) Destabilization of CHK2 by a missense mutation associated with Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Cancer Research 61, 80628067.
46.Varley, JM (2003) Germline TP53 mutations and Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Human Mutation 21, 313320.
47.Lawrence, MS et al. (2014) Discovery and saturation analysis of cancer genes across 21 tumour types. Nature 505, 495.
48.Bouaoun, L et al. (2016) TP53 Variations in human cancers: new lessons from the IARC TP53 database and genomics data. Human Mutation 37, 865876.
49.Hainaut, P and Pfeifer, GP (2016) Somatic TP53 mutations in the era of genome sequencing. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine 6, a026179.
50.Liu, Y et al. (2016) Deletions linked to TP53 loss drive cancer through p53-independent mechanisms. Nature 531, 471475.
51.Fiskvik, I et al. (2013) Karyotyping of diffuse large B-cell lymphomas: loss of 17p is associated with poor patient outcome. European Journal of Haematology 91, 332338.
52.Hallek, M (2017) Chronic lymphocytic leukemia: 2017 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and treatment. American Journal of Hematology 92, 946965.
53.Bartek, J, Lukas, J and Bartkova, J (2007) DNA Damage response as an anti-cancer barrier: damage threshold and the concept of ‘conditional haploinsufficiency’. Cell Cycle 6, 23442347.
54.Barlow, C et al. (1996) Atm-deficient mice: a paradigm of ataxia telangiectasia. Cell 86, 159171.
55.Xu, Y and Baltimore, D (1996) Dual roles of ATM in the cellular response to radiation and in cell growth control. Genes & Development 10, 24012410.
56.Jiang, X et al. (2019) Current status and future prospects of PARP inhibitor clinical trials in ovarian cancer. Cancer Management and Research 11, 4371.
57.Rabik, CA, Njoku, MC and Dolan, ME (2006) Inactivation of O6-alkylguanine DNA alkyltransferase as a means to enhance chemotherapy. Cancer Treatment Reviews 32, 261276.
58.Takai, H et al. (2002) Chk2-deficient mice exhibit radioresistance and defective p53-mediated transcription. The EMBO Journal 21, 51955205.
59.Niida, H et al. (2010) Cooperative functions of Chk1 and Chk2 reduce tumour susceptibility in vivo. The EMBO Journal 29, 35583570.
60.Brandsma, I et al. (2017) Directing the use of DDR kinase inhibitors in cancer treatment. Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs 26, 13411355.
61.Hickson, I et al. (2004) Identification and characterization of a novel and specific inhibitor of the ataxia-telangiectasia mutated kinase ATM. Cancer Research 64, 91529159.
62.Biddlestone-Thorpe, L et al. (2013) ATM kinase inhibition preferentially sensitizes p53-mutant glioma to ionizing radiation. Clinical Cancer Research 19, 31893200.
63.Batey, MA et al. (2013) Preclinical evaluation of a novel ATM inhibitor, KU59403, in vitro and in vivo in p53 functional and dysfunctional models of human cancer. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 12, 959967.
64.Karlin, J et al. (2018) Orally bioavailable and blood–brain barrier-penetrating ATM inhibitor (AZ32) radiosensitizes intracranial gliomas in mice. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 17, 16371647.
65.Durant, ST et al. (2018) The brain-penetrant clinical ATM inhibitor AZD1390 radiosensitizes and improves survival of preclinical brain tumor models. Science Advances 4, eaat1719eaeaat19.
66.Pike, KG et al. (2018) The identification of potent, selective, and orally available inhibitors of ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase: the discovery of AZD0156 (8-{6-[3-(dimethylamino)propoxy]pyridin-3-yl}-3-methyl-1-(tetrahydro-2H-pyran-4-yl)-1,3-dihydro-2H-imidazo[4,5-c]quinolin-2-one). Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 61, 38233841.
67.Rainey, MD et al. (2008) Transient inhibition of ATM kinase is sufficient to enhance cellular sensitivity to ionizing radiation. Cancer Research 68, 74667474.
68.Dohmen, AJC et al. (2017) Identification of a novel ATM inhibitor with cancer cell specific radiosensitization activity. Oncotarget 8, 7392573937.
69.Ronco, C et al. (2017) ATM, ATR, CHK1, CHK2 and WEE1 inhibitors in cancer and cancer stem cells. Medicinal Chemistry Communications 8, 295319.
70.Zabludoff, SD et al. (2008) AZD7762, A novel checkpoint kinase inhibitor, drives checkpoint abrogation and potentiates DNA-targeted therapies. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 7, 29552966.
71.Arienti, KL et al. (2005) Checkpoint kinase inhibitors: SAR and radioprotective properties of a series of 2-arylbenzimidazoles. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 48, 18731885.
72.Carlessi, L et al. (2007) Biochemical and cellular characterization of VRX0466617, a novel and selective inhibitor for the checkpoint kinase Chk2. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 6, 935944.
73.Jobson, AG et al. (2009) Cellular inhibition of checkpoint kinase 2 (Chk2) and potentiation of camptothecins and radiation by the novel Chk2 inhibitor PV1019 [7-nitro-1H-indole-2-carboxylic acid {4-[1-(guanidinohydrazone)-ethyl]-phenyl}-amide]. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 331, 816826.
74.Caldwell, JJ et al. (2011) Structure-Based design of potent and selective 2-(quinazolin-2-yl)phenol inhibitors of checkpoint kinase 2. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 54, 580590.
75.Raso, A et al. (2012) Characterization of glioma stem cells through multiple stem cell markers and their specific sensitization to double-strand break-inducing agents by pharmacological inhibition of ataxia telangiectasia mutated protein. Brain Pathology 22, 677688.
76.Anderson, VE et al. (2011) CCT241533 is a potent and selective inhibitor of CHK2 that potentiates the cytotoxicity of PARP inhibitors. Cancer Research 71, 463472.
77.Pires, IM, Ward, TH and Dive, C (2010) Oxaliplatin responses in colorectal cancer cells are modulated by CHK2 kinase inhibitors. British Journal of Pharmacology 159, 13261338.
78.Sausville, E et al. (2014) Phase I dose-escalation study of AZD7762, a checkpoint kinase inhibitor, in combination with gemcitabine in US patients with advanced solid tumors. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 73, 539549.
79.Saldivar, J, Cortez, D and Cimprich, K (2017) The essential kinase ATR: ensuring faithful duplication of a challenging genome. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 18, 622636.
80.Thada, V and Cortez, D (2019) Common motifs in ETAA1 and TOPBP1 required for ATR kinase activation. Journal of Biological Chemistry 294, 83958402.
81.Rundle, S et al. (2017) Targeting the ATR-CHK1 axis in cancer therapy. Cancers 9, 41.
82.Lewis, CW et al. (2017) Prolonged mitotic arrest induced by Wee1 inhibition sensitizes breast cancer cells to paclitaxel. Oncotarget 8, 7370573722.
83.Lin, AB, McNeely, SC and Beckmann, RP (2017) Achieving precision death with cell-cycle inhibitors that target DNA replication and repair. Clinical Cancer Research 23, 32323240.
84.Lee, J, Kumagai, A and Dunphy, WG (2001) Positive regulation of wee1 by Chk1 and 14-3-3 proteins. Molecular Biology of the Cell 12, 551563.
85.Wyman, C, Ristic, D and Kanaar, R (2004) Homologous recombination-mediated double-strand break repair. DNA Repair (Amst) 3, 827833.
86.Brown, JS et al. (2017) Targeting DNA repair in cancer: beyond PARP inhibitors. Cancer Discovery 7, 2037.
87.Yazinski, SA et al. (2017) ATR Inhibition disrupts rewired homologous recombination and fork protection pathways in PARP inhibitor-resistant BRCA-deficient cancer cells. Genes & Development 31, 318332.
88.Sørensen, CS et al. (2005) The cell-cycle checkpoint kinase Chk1 is required for mammalian homologous recombination repair. Nature Cell Biology 7, 195201.
89.Buisson, R et al. (2017) Coupling of homologous recombination and the checkpoint by ATR. Molecular Cell 65, 336346.
90.Krajewska, M et al. (2012) Forced activation of Cdk1 via wee1 inhibition impairs homologous recombination. Oncogene 32, 3001.
91.de Klein, A et al. (2000) Targeted disruption of the cell-cycle checkpoint gene ATR leads to early embryonic lethality in mice. Current Biology 10, 479482.
92.Liu, Q et al. (2000) Chk1 is an essential kinase that is regulated by Atr and required for the G(2)/M DNA damage checkpoint. Genes & Development 14, 14481459.
93.Tominaga, Y et al. (2006) Murine Wee1 plays a critical role in cell cycle regulation and pre-implantation stages of embryonic development. International Journal of Biological Sciences 2, 161170.
94.Murga, M (2009) A mouse model of ATR-Seckel shows embryonic replicative stress and accelerated aging. Nature Genetics 41, 891898.
95.Brown, EJ and Baltimore, D (2000) ATR Disruption leads to chromosomal fragmentation and early embryonic lethality. Genes & Development 14, 397402.
96.Macheret, M and Halazonetis, TD (2015) DNA replication stress as a Hallmark of cancer. Annual Review of Pathology: Mechanisms of Disease 10, 425448.
97.Magdalou, I et al. (2014) The causes of replication stress and their consequences on genome stability and cell fate. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 30, 154164.
98.Berti, M and Vindigni, A (2016) Replication stress: getting back on track. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 23, 103109.
99.Massague, J (2004) G1 cell-cycle control and cancer. Nature 432, 298306.
100.Kotsantis, P, Petermann, E and Boulton, SJ (2018) Mechanisms of oncogene-induced replication stress: jigsaw falling into place. Cancer Discovery 8, 537555.
101.Hanahan, D and Weinberg, RA (2011) Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 144, 646674.
102.Syljuåsen, RG et al. (2005) Inhibition of human Chk1 causes increased initiation of DNA replication, phosphorylation of ATR targets, and DNA breakage. Molecular and Cellular Biology 25, 35533562.
103.Kitao, H et al. (2018) DNA Replication stress and cancer chemotherapy. Cancer Science 109, 264271.
104.Kim, J-Y et al. (2015) Resveratrol analogue (E)-8-acetoxy-2-[2-(3, 4–diacetoxyphenyl) ethenyl]-quinazoline induces G2/M cell cycle arrest through the activation of ATM/ATR in human cervical carcinoma HeLa cells. Oncology Reports 33, 26392647.
105.Cliby, WA et al. (1998) Overexpression of a kinase-inactive ATR protein causes sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents and defects in cell cycle checkpoints. The EMBO Journal 17, 159169.
106.Hall-Jackson, CA et al. (1999) ATR Is a caffeine-sensitive, DNA-activated protein kinase with a substrate specificity distinct from DNA-PK. Oncogene 18, 67076713.
107.Sarkaria, JN et al. (1999) Inhibition of ATM and ATR kinase activities by the radiosensitizing agent, Caffeine. Cancer Research 59, 43754382.
108.Nghiem, P et al. (2002) ATR Is not required for p53 activation but synergizes with p53 in the replication checkpoint. Journal of Biological Chemistry 277, 44284434.
109.Peasland, A et al. (2011) Identification and evaluation of a potent novel ATR inhibitor, NU6027, in breast and ovarian cancer cell lines. British Journal of Cancer 105, 372381.
110.Toledo, LI et al. (2011) A cell-based screen identifies ATR inhibitors with synthetic lethal properties for cancer-associated mutations. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 18, 721727.
111.Teng, P-n et al. (2015) Pharmacologic inhibition of ATR and ATM offers clinically important distinctions to enhancing platinum or radiation response in ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancer cells. Gynecologic Oncology 136, 554561.
112.Foote, KM et al. (2013) Discovery of 4-{4-[(3R)-3-methylmorpholin-4-yl]-6-[1-(methylsulfonyl)cyclopropyl]pyrimidin-2-yl}-1H-indole (AZ20): a potent and selective inhibitor of ATR protein kinase with monotherapy in vivo antitumor activity. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 56, 21252138.
113.Ma, J et al. (2017) Mechanisms responsible for the synergistic antileukemic interactions between ATR inhibition and cytarabine in acute myeloid leukemia cells. Scientific Reports 7, 4195041950.
114.Liu, S et al. (2017) Inhibition of ATR potentiates the cytotoxic effect of gemcitabine on pancreatic cancer cells through enhancement of DNA damage and abrogation of ribonucleotide reductase induction by gemcitabine. Oncology Reports 37, 33773386.
115.Foote, KM et al. (2018) Discovery and characterization of AZD6738, a potent inhibitor of ataxia telangiectasia mutated and Rad3 related (ATR) kinase with application as an anticancer agent. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 61, 98899907.
116.Vendetti, FP et al. (2015) The orally active and bioavailable ATR kinase inhibitor AZD6738 potentiates the anti-tumor effects of cisplatin to resolve ATM-deficient non-small cell lung cancer in vivo. Oncotarget 6, 4428944305.
117.Dillon, MT et al. (2017) Radiosensitization by the ATR inhibitor AZD6738 through generation of acentric micronuclei. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 16, 2534.
118.Min, A et al. (2017) AZD6738, a novel oral inhibitor of ATR, induces synthetic lethality with ATM deficiency in gastric cancer cells. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 16, 566577. research 78(13 Supplement), 838–38.
119.Reaper, PM et al. (2011) Selective killing of ATM-or p53-deficient cancer cells through inhibition of ATR. Nature Chemical Biology 7, 428430.
120.Alsubhi, N et al. (2016) Chk1 phosphorylated at serine345 is a predictor of early local recurrence and radio-resistance in breast cancer. Molecular Oncology 10, 213223.
121.Fujisawa, H et al. (2015) VE-821, an ATR inhibitor, causes radiosensitization in human tumor cells irradiated with high LET radiation. Radiation Oncology (London, England) 10, 175175.
122.Šalovská, B et al. (2018) Radio-sensitizing effects of VE-821 and beyond: distinct phosphoproteomic and metabolomic changes after ATR inhibition in irradiated MOLT-4 cells. PLoS One 13, e0199349–e49.
123.Jossé, R et al. (2014) ATR Inhibitors VE-821 and VX-970 sensitize cancer cells to topoisomerase i inhibitors by disabling DNA replication initiation and fork elongation responses. Cancer Research 74, 69686979.
124.Huntoon, CJ et al. (2013) ATR inhibition broadly sensitizes ovarian cancer cells to chemotherapy independent of BRCA status. Cancer Research 73, 36833691.
125.Middleton, FK et al. (2015) Common cancer-associated imbalances in the DNA damage response confer sensitivity to single agent ATR inhibition. Oncotarget 6, 3239632409.
126.Hall, AB et al. (2014) Potentiation of tumor responses to DNA damaging therapy by the selective ATR inhibitor VX-970. Oncotarget 5, 56745685.
127.Leszczynska, KB et al. (2016) Preclinical testing of an Atr inhibitor demonstrates improved response to standard therapies for esophageal cancer. Radiotherapy and Oncology: Journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology 121, 232238.
128.Shi, Q et al. (2018) The identification of the ATR inhibitor VE-822 as a therapeutic strategy for enhancing cisplatin chemosensitivity in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Letters 432, 5668.
129.Kurmasheva, RT et al. (2018) Initial testing (stage 1) of M6620 (formerly VX-970), a novel ATR inhibitor, alone and combined with cisplatin and melphalan, by the Pediatric Preclinical Testing Program. Pediatric Blood & Cancer 65, e26825–n/a.
130.Fordham, SE et al. (2018) Inhibition of ATR acutely sensitizes acute myeloid leukemia cells to nucleoside analogs that target ribonucleotide reductase. Blood Advances 2, 11571169.
131.Tu, X et al. (2018) ATR inhibition is a promising radiosensitizing strategy for triple-negative breast cancer. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 17, 24622472.
132.Nagel, R et al. (2019) Inhibition of the replication stress response is a synthetic vulnerability in SCLC that acts synergistically in combination with cisplatin. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 18, 762770.
133.Schmitt, A et al. (2017) ATM deficiency Is associated with sensitivity to PARP1- and ATR inhibitors in lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Research 77, 30403056.
134.Wengner, AM et al. (2018) Synergistic in Vivo activity of the ATR inhibitor BAY 1895344 in combination with the targeted alpha therapy radium-223 dichloride in a preclinical tumor model mimicking bone metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Cancer Research 78(13 Suppl), Abstract nr 838.
135.Shapiro, GI and Harper, JW (1999) Anticancer drug targets: cell cycle and checkpoint control. The Journal of Clinical Investigation 104, 16451653.
136.Graves, PR et al. (2000) The Chk1 protein kinase and the Cdc25C regulatory pathways are targets of the anticancer agent UCN-01. Journal of Biological Chemistry 275, 56005605.
137.Xiao, Y et al. (2013) Identification of preferred chemotherapeutics for combining with a CHK1 inhibitor. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 12, 22852295.
138.Isono, M et al. (2017) Checkpoint kinase inhibitor AZD7762 strongly sensitises urothelial carcinoma cells to gemcitabine. Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research: CR 36, 11.
139.Xu, H et al. (2011) Checkpoint kinase inhibitor synergizes with DNA-damaging agents in G1 checkpoint-defective neuroblastoma. International Journal of Cancer 129, 19531962.
140.Gadhikar, MA et al. (2013) Chk1/2 inhibition overcomes the cisplatin resistance of head and neck cancer cells secondary to the loss of functional p53. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 12, 18601873.
141.Bartucci, M et al. (2011) Therapeutic targeting of Chk1 in NSCLC stem cells during chemotherapy. Cell Death and Differentiation 19, 768.
142.Blasina, A et al. (2008) Breaching the DNA damage checkpoint via PF-00477736, a novel small-molecule inhibitor of checkpoint kinase 1. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 7, 23942404.
143.Bryant, C, Rawlinson, R and Massey, AJ (2014) Chk1 inhibition as a novel therapeutic strategy for treating triple-negative breast and ovarian cancers. BMC Cancer 14, 570570.
144.Kim, MK, James, J and Annunziata, CM (2015) Topotecan synergizes with CHEK1 (CHK1) inhibitor to induce apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells. BMC Cancer 15, 196196.
145.Fang, DD et al. (2013) Combined gemcitabine and CHK1 inhibitor treatment induces apoptosis resistance in cancer stem cell-like cells enriched with tumor spheroids from a non-small cell lung cancer cell line. Frontiers of Medicine 7, 462476.
146.Zhang, C et al. (2009) PF-00477736 mediates checkpoint kinase 1 signaling pathway and potentiates docetaxel-induced efficacy in Xenografts. Clinical Cancer Research 15, 46304640.
147.Busch, C-J et al. (2013) HPV-positive HNSCC cell lines but not primary human fibroblasts are radiosensitized by the inhibition of Chk1. Radiotherapy and Oncology 108, 495499.
148.Restelli, V et al. (2015) Characterization of a mantle cell lymphoma cell line resistant to the Chk1 inhibitor PF-00477736. Oncotarget 6, 3722937240.
149.Nguyen, T et al. (2015) Synergism between bosutinib (SKI-606) and the Chk1 inhibitor (PF-00477736) in highly imatinib-resistant BCR/ABL+ leukemia cells. Leukemia Research 39, 6571.
150.Ferrao, PT et al. (2011) Efficacy of CHK inhibitors as single agents in MYC-driven lymphoma cells. Oncogene 31, 1661.
151.Suzuki, M et al. (2017) MK-8776, a novel Chk1 inhibitor, exhibits an improved radiosensitizing effect compared to UCN-01 by exacerbating radiation-induced aberrant mitosis. Translational Oncology 10, 491500.
152.Zhou, Z-R et al. (2017) The Chk1 inhibitor MK-8776 increases the radiosensitivity of human triple-negative breast cancer by inhibiting autophagy. Acta Pharmacologica Sinica 38, 513523.
153.Bridges, KA et al. (2016) MK-8776, a novel chk1 kinase inhibitor, radiosensitizes p53-defective human tumor cells. Oncotarget 7, 7166071672.
154.Montano, R et al. (2013) Sensitization of human cancer cells to gemcitabine by the Chk1 inhibitor MK-8776: cell cycle perturbation and impact of administration schedule in vitro and in vivo. BMC Cancer 13, 604.
155.Herůdková, J et al. (2017) Chk1 inhibitor SCH900776 effectively potentiates the cytotoxic effects of platinum-based chemotherapeutic drugs in human colon cancer cells. Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.) 19, 830841.
156.Walton, MI et al. (2012) CCT244747 Is a novel potent and selective CHK1 inhibitor with oral efficacy alone and in combination with genotoxic anticancer drugs. Clinical Cancer Research: an Official Journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 18, 56505661.
157.Patel, R et al. (2017) An orally bioavailable Chk1 inhibitor, CCT244747, sensitizes bladder and head and neck cancer cell lines to radiation. Radiotherapy and Oncology: Journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology 122, 470475.
158.Booth, L et al. (2018) The CHK1 inhibitor SRA737 synergizes with PARP1 inhibitors to kill carcinoma cells. Cancer Biology & Therapy 19, 786796.
159.King, C et al. (2015) LY2606368 causes replication catastrophe and antitumor effects through CHK1-dependent mechanisms. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 14, 20042013.
160.Ghelli Luserna Di Rorà, A et al. (2016) Prexasertib, a Chk1/Chk2 inhibitor, increases the effectiveness of conventional therapy in B-/T- cell progenitor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Oncotarget 7, 5337753391.
161.Sen, T et al. (2017) CHK1 inhibition in small-cell lung cancer produces single-agent activity in biomarker-defined disease subsets and combination activity with Cisplatin or Olaparib. Cancer research 77, 38703884.
162.Lowery, CD et al. (2017) The checkpoint kinase 1 inhibitor prexasertib induces regression of preclinical models of human neuroblastoma. Clinical Cancer Research 23, 43544363.
163.Brill, E et al. (2017) Prexasertib, a cell cycle checkpoint kinases 1 and 2 inhibitor, increases in vitro toxicity of PARP inhibition by preventing Rad51 foci formation in BRCA wild type high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Oncotarget 8, 111026–40.
164.Yin, Y et al. (2017) Chk1 inhibition potentiates the therapeutic efficacy of PARP inhibitor BMN673 in gastric cancer. American Journal of Cancer Research 7, 473483.
165.Hsu, W-H et al. (2019) Checkpoint kinase 1 inhibition enhances cisplatin cytotoxicity and overcomes cisplatin resistance in SCLC by promoting mitotic cell death. Journal of Thoracic Oncology 14, 10321045.
166.Wang, Y et al. (2001) Radiosensitization of p53 mutant cells by PD0166285, a novel G2 checkpoint Abrogator. Cancer Research 61, 82118217.
167.Mir, SE et al. (2010) In silico analysis of kinase expression identifies WEE1 as a gatekeeper against mitotic catastrophe in glioblastoma. Cancer Cell 18, 244257.
168.PosthumaDeBoer, J et al. (2011) WEE1 Inhibition sensitizes osteosarcoma to radiotherapy. BMC Cancer 11, 156156.
169.de Gooijer, MC et al. (2018) ATP-binding cassette transporters limit the brain penetration of Wee1 inhibitors. Investigational New Drugs 36, 380387.
170.Panek, RL et al. (1997) In vitro pharmacological characterization of PD 166285, a new nanomolar potent and broadly active protein tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 283, 14331444.
171.Hirai, H et al. (2009) Small-molecule inhibition of Wee1 kinase by MK-1775 selectively sensitizes p53-deficient tumor cells to DNA-damaging agents. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 8, 29923000.
172.Kreahling, JM et al. (2012) MK1775, A selective Wee1 inhibitor, shows single-agent antitumor activity against sarcoma cells. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 11, 174182.
173.Hirai, H et al. (2010) MK-1775, a small molecule Wee1 inhibitor, enhances anti-tumor efficacy of various DNA-damaging agents, including 5-fluorouracil. Cancer Biology & Therapy 9, 514522.
174.Rajeshkumar, NV et al. (2011) MK-1775, a potent Wee1 inhibitor, synergizes with gemcitabine to achieve tumor regressions, selectively in p53-deficient pancreatic cancer xenografts. Clinical Cancer Research: an Official Journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 17, 27992806.
175.Bridges, KA et al. (2011) MK-1775, a novel Wee1 kinase inhibitor, radiosensitizes p53-defective human tumor cells. Clinical Cancer Research: an Official Journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 17, 56385648.
176.Sarcar, B et al. (2011) Targeting radiation-induced G(2) checkpoint activation with the Wee-1 inhibitor MK-1775 in glioblastoma cell lines. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 10, 24052414.
177.Heijink, AM et al. (2015) A haploid genetic screen identifies the G1/S regulatory machinery as a determinant of Wee1 inhibitor sensitivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112, 1516015165.
178.Sanjiv, K et al. (2016) Cancer-specific synthetic lethality between ATR and CHK1 kinase activities. Cell Reports 14, 298309.
179.Jin, J et al. (2018) Combined inhibition of ATR and WEE1 as a novel therapeutic strategy in triple-negative breast cancer. Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.) 20, 478488.
180.Bukhari, AB et al. (2019) Inhibiting Wee1 and ATR kinases produces tumor-selective synthetic lethality and suppresses metastasis. The Journal of Clinical Investigation 129, 13291344.
181.Chaudhuri, L et al. (2014) CHK1 And WEE1 inhibition combine synergistically to enhance therapeutic efficacy in acute myeloid leukemia ex vivo. Haematologica 99, 688696.
182.Russell, MR et al. (2013) Combination therapy targeting the Chk1 and Wee1 kinases shows therapeutic efficacy in neuroblastoma. Cancer Research 73, 776784.
183.Hauge, S et al. (2017) Combined inhibition of Wee1 and Chk1 gives synergistic DNA damage in S-phase due to distinct regulation of CDK activity and CDC45 loading. Oncotarget 8, 1096610979.
184.Magnussen, GI et al. (2015) Combined inhibition of the cell cycle related proteins Wee1 and Chk1/2 induces synergistic anti-cancer effect in melanoma. BMC Cancer 15, 462462.
185.Chilà, R et al. (2015) Combined inhibition of Chk1 and Wee1 as a new therapeutic strategy for mantle cell lymphoma. Oncotarget 6, 33943408.
186.Mohni, KN et al. (2015) A synthetic lethal screen identifies DNA repair pathways that sensitize cancer cells to combined ATR inhibition and cisplatin treatments. PLoS One 10, e0125482–e82.
187.Kim, H et al. (2017) Targeting the ATR/CHK1 axis with PARP inhibition results in tumor regression in BRCA-mutant ovarian cancer models. Clinical Cancer Research: an Official Journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 23, 30973108.
188.Booth, L et al. (2013) PARP and CHK inhibitors interact to cause DNA damage and cell death in mammary carcinoma cells. Cancer Biology & Therapy 14, 458465.
189.Karnak, D et al. (2014) Combined inhibition of Wee1 and PARP1/2 for radiosensitization in pancreatic cancer. Clinical Cancer Research: an Official Journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 20, 50855096.
190.Parsels, LA et al. (2018) PARP1 trapping and DNA replication stress enhance radiosensitization with combined WEE1 and PARP inhibitors. Molecular Cancer Research: MCR 16, 222232.
191.Thomas, A et al. (2018) Phase I study of ATR inhibitor M6620 in combination with topotecan in patients with advanced solid tumors. Journal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 36, 15941602.
192.Bono, JSD et al. (2019) First-in-human trial of the oral ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) inhibitor BAY 1895344 in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. Journal of Clinical Oncology 37(15_suppl), 30073007.
193.Samadder, P et al. (2017) Synthesis and profiling of a novel potent selective inhibitor of CHK1 kinase possessing unusual N-trifluoromethylpyrazole pharmacophore resistant to metabolic N-dealkylation. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 16, 18311842.
194.Leijen, S et al. (2016) Phase II study of WEE1 inhibitor AZD1775 plus carboplatin in patients With TP53-mutated ovarian cancer refractory or resistant to first-line therapy within 3 months. Journal of Clinical Oncology 34, 43544361.
195.Oza, AM et al. (2015) An international, biomarker-directed, randomized, phase II trial of AZD1775 plus paclitaxel and carboplatin (P/C) for the treatment of women with platinum-sensitive, TP53–mutant ovarian cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 33(15_suppl), 55065506.
196.Lheureux, S et al. (2015) A randomized, placebo-controlled phase II trial comparing gemcitabine monotherapy to gemcitabine in combination with AZD 1775 (MK 1775) in women with recurrent, platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or Fallopian tube cancers: trial of princess Margaret, Mayo, Chicago, and California consortia. Journal of Clinical Oncology 33(15_suppl), TPS5613TPTPS13.
197.Cuneo, KC et al. (2019) Dose escalation trial of the wee1 inhibitor Adavosertib (AZD1775) in combination with gemcitabine and radiation for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 37, 26432650.
198.Bever, KM and Le, DT (2018) DNA repair defects and implications for immunotherapy. The Journal of Clinical Investigation 128, 42364242.
199.Zhang, Q et al. (2019) Inhibition of ATM increases interferon signaling and sensitizes pancreatic cancer to immune checkpoint blockade therapy. Cancer research 79, 39403951.

Keywords

DNA damage checkpoint kinases in cancer

  • Hannah L. Smith (a1), Harriet Southgate (a2), Deborah A. Tweddle (a2) and Nicola J. Curtin (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.