Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T07:46:26.037Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interaction of diet and training on endurance performance in rats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2001

Jong Sam Lee
Affiliation:
Exercise Metabolism Group, School of Medical Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora 3083, Victoria, Australia and Department of Human Biology and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1
Clinton R. Bruce
Affiliation:
Exercise Metabolism Group, School of Medical Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora 3083, Victoria, Australia and Department of Human Biology and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1
Lawrence L. Spriet
Affiliation:
Exercise Metabolism Group, School of Medical Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora 3083, Victoria, Australia and Department of Human Biology and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1
John A. Hawley
Affiliation:
Exercise Metabolism Group, School of Medical Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora 3083, Victoria, Australia and Department of Human Biology and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1
Get access

Abstract

We determined the interaction of diet and training on metabolic adaptations in skeletal muscle and liver, and the consequences of these adaptations for endurance. Eighty rats performed a baseline treadmill run to exhaustion at 16 m min-1 (RUN1) and were then divided into two groups and given one of two diets: high carbohydrate (CHO) or high fat (FAT). Each dietary group was then divided into one of four subgroups: sedentary control that performed no training (NT); low-intensity running (8 m min-1; LOW) and two groups who trained at their maximal voluntary running speed without electrical stimulation (28 m min-1; VMAX). Training volume was identical for LOW and VMAX (1000 m session-1) and animals ran 4 days week-1 for 8 weeks. To assess the interaction of the higher intensity exercise with diet, a second endurance test (RUN2) was undertaken after 6 weeks at either 16 m min-1 or 28 m min-1. The NT group ran for a longer duration (increase of 77 %) after FAT than CHO (239 ± 28 vs. 135 ± 30 min, P < 0.05) at 16 m min-1. There were no differences in RUN2 for the LOW group when rats ran at 16 m min-1 (454 ± 86 vs. 427 ± 75 min for CHO and FAT groups, respectively), but rats in the VMAX group fed FAT ran longer than rats fed CHO at 28 m min-1 (100 ± 28 vs. 58 ± 11 min, respectively, P < 0.05). FAT increased the activities of the enzymes citrate synthase, β-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase and carnitine palmitoyl-transferase compared to CHO (P < 0.01), but there was no systematic effect of training. We conclude: (1) there was no additive effect of a high-fat diet on endurance performance when rats performed low-intensity training; (2) running performance at 28 m min-1 was only enhanced by a high-fat diet after more intense training; (3) diet-induced and training-induced adaptations that increase exercise capacity may be under independent control. Experimental Physiology (2001) 86.4, 499-508.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Physiological Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)