Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

WHICH OPTIONS FIT BEST? OPERATIONALIZING THE SOCIO-ECOLOGICAL NICHE CONCEPT

  • KATRIEN DESCHEEMAEKER (a1), ESTHER RONNER (a1), MARY OLLENBURGER (a1), ANGELINUS C. FRANKE (a2), CHARLOTTE J. KLAPWIJK (a1) (a3), GATIEN N. FALCONNIER (a1), JANNIKE WICHERN (a1) and KENNETH E. GILLER (a1)...

Summary

The large diversity of farms and farming systems in sub-Saharan Africa calls for agricultural improvement options that are adapted to the context in which smallholder farmers operate. The socio-ecological niche concept incorporates the agro-ecological, socio-cultural, economic and institutional dimensions and the multiple levels of this context in order to identify which options fit best. In this paper, we illustrate how farming systems analysis, following the DEED cycle of Describe, Explain, Explore and Design, and embedding co-learning amongst researchers, farmers and other stakeholders, helps to operationalize the socio-ecological niche concept. Examples illustrate how farm typologies, detailed farm characterization and on-farm experimental work, in combination with modelling and participatory approaches inform the matching of options to the context at regional, village, farm and field level. Recommendation domains at these gradually finer levels form the basis for gradually more detailed baskets of options from which farmers and other stakeholders may choose, test and adjust to their specific needs. Tailored options identified through the DEED cycle proof to be more relevant, feasible and performant as compared to blanket recommendations in terms of both researcher and farmer-identified criteria. As part of DEED, on-farm experiments are particularly useful in revealing constraints and risks faced by farmers. We show that targeting options to the niches in which they perform best, helps to reduce this risk. Whereas the conclusions of our work about the potential for improving smallholders’ livelihoods are often sobering, farming systems analysis allows substantiating the limitations of technological options, thus highlighting the need for enabling policies and institutions that may improve the larger-scale context and increase the uptake potential of options.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      WHICH OPTIONS FIT BEST? OPERATIONALIZING THE SOCIO-ECOLOGICAL NICHE CONCEPT
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      WHICH OPTIONS FIT BEST? OPERATIONALIZING THE SOCIO-ECOLOGICAL NICHE CONCEPT
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      WHICH OPTIONS FIT BEST? OPERATIONALIZING THE SOCIO-ECOLOGICAL NICHE CONCEPT
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Corresponding author

Corresponding author. Email: katrien.descheemaeker@wur.nl

References

Hide All
Azzarri, C., Haile, B., Howard, P. and Roberts, C. (2014). Mali Africa RISING Baseline Evaluation Survey. Washington DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
Baudron, F., Jaleta, M., Okitoi, O. and Tegegn, A. (2014). Conservation agriculture in African mixed crop-livestock systems: Expanding the niche. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 187:171182.
Bielders, C. L. and Gérard, B., (2015). Millet response to microdose fertilization in south-western Niger: Effect of antecedent fertility management and environmental factors. Field Crops Research 171:165175.
Bigot, Y. (1989). Traction animale et motorisation en zone cotonniere d'Afrique de l'Ouest. Les Cahiers de la Recherche Développement 23:113.
Chambers, R., Pacey, A. and Thrupp, L. A. (Eds). (1989). Farmer First. Farmer Innovation and Agricultural Research. London: IT Publications.
Clark, W. C., Tomich, T. P., van Noordwijk, M., Guston, D., Catacutan, D., Dickson, N. M. and McNie, E. (2011). Boundary work for sustainable development: Natural resource management at the consultative group on international agricultural research (CGIAR). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA. doi:10.1073/pnas.0900231108.
Collinson, M. (ed). (2000). A History of Farming Systems Research, 448. Wallingford: CABI.
Darnhofer, I., Gibbon, D. and Dedieu, B. (2012). Farming systems research: An approach to inquiry. In Farming Systems Research into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic, 331 (Eds Darnhofer, I., Gibbon, D. and Dedieu, B.). Netherlands, Dordrecht: Springer.
De Ridder, N., Breman, H., van Keulen, H. and Stomph, T. J. (2004). Revisiting a ‘cure against land hunger’: Soil fertility management and farming systems dynamics in the West African Sahel. Agricultural Systems 80 (2):109131.
Doré, T., Makowski, D., Malézieux, E., Munier-Jolain, N., Tchamitchian, M. and Tittonell, P. (2011). Facing up to the paradigm of ecological intensification in agronomy: Revisiting methods, concepts and knowledge. European Journal of Agronomy 34:197210.
Dorward, A. and Chirwa, E. (2011). The Malawi agricultural input subsidy programme: 2005/06 to 2008/09. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 9 (1):232247.
Duflo, E., Kermer, M., and Robinson, J. (2011). Nudging farmers to use fertilizer: Theory and experimental evidence from Kenya. The American Economic Review 101:23502390.
Falconnier, G. N., Descheemaeker, K., Van Mourik, T. A. and Giller, K. E. (2016). Unravelling the causes of variability in crop yields and treatment responses for better tailoring of options for sustainable intensification in southern Mali. Field Crops Research 187:113126.
Falconnier, G. N., Descheemaeker, K., van Mourik, T. A., Sanogo, O. M. and Giller, K. E. (2015). Understanding farm trajectories and development pathways: Two decades of change in southern Mali. Agricultural Systems 139:210222.
Farrow, A., Ronner, E., van den Brand, G., Boahen, S., Leonardo, W., Wolde-Meskel, E., Adjei-Nsiah, S., Chikowo, R., Baijukya, F., Ebanyat, P., Ademola, E., Phiphira, L., Woomer, P. and Giller, K. E. (2019) From best fit technologies to best fit approaches: Incorporating the determinants of legume technology adoption in the N2Africa research design. Experimental Agriculture 55 (S1):226251.
Feola, G., Sattler, C. and Saysel, A. K. (2012). Simulation models in farming systems research: Potential and challenges. In Farming Systems Research 3 into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic, 281306 (Eds Darnhofer, I., Gibbon, D. and Dedieu, B.). Netherlands, Dordrecht: Springer.
Franke, A. C., Baijukya, F., Kantengwa, S., Reckling, M., Vanlauwe, B. and Giller, K. E. (2019) Poor farmers - poor yields: Socio-economic, soil fertility and crop management indicators affecting climbing bean productivity in northern Rwanda. Experimental Agriculture, 55 (S1):1434
Franke, A. C., Rufino, M. C. and Farrow, A. (2011). Characterisation of the impact zones and mandate areas in the N2Africa project. Report for the N2Africa Project. Wageningen: Wageningen University. http://www.n2africa.org/content/characterisation-impact-zones-and-mandate-areas-n2africa-project.
Franke, A. C., Van Den Brand, G. J. and Giller, K. E. (2014). Which farmers benefit most from grain legumes in Malawi? An ex-ante impact assessment based on farm characteristions and model explorations. European Journal of Agronomy 58:2838.
Fuentes, P. A., Bumb, B. and Johnson, M. (2011). Improving fertilizer markets in West Africa: The fertilizer supply chain in Mali. Paper Series IFDC - P-41 International Fertilizer Development Center (IFDC) and International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
Garnett, T., Appleby, M. C., Balmford, A., Bateman, I. J., Benton, T. G., Bloomer, P., Burlingame, B., Dawkins, M., Dolan, L., Fraser, D., Herrero, M., Hoffmann, I., Smith, P., Thornton, P. K., Toulmin, C., Vermeulen, S. J. and Godfray, H. C. J. (2013). Sustainable intensification in agriculture: Premises and policies. Science 341:3334.
Giller, K. E. (2013). Can we define the term ‘farming systems’? A question of scale. Outlook on Agriculture 42:149153.
Giller, K. E., Leeuwis, C., Andersson, J. A., Andriesse, W., Brouwer, A., Frost, P., Hebinck, P., Heitkönig, I., Van Ittersum, M. K. and Koning, N. (2008). Competing claims on natural resources: What role for science. Ecology and Society 13:34.
Giller, K. E., Rowe, E. C., de Ridder, N. and van Keulen, H. (2006). Resource use dynamics and interactions in the tropics: Scaling up in space and time. Agricultural Systems 88:827.
Giller, K. E., Tittonell, P., Rufino, M. C., van Wijk, M. T., Zingore, S., Mapfumo, P., Adjei-Nsiah, S., Herrero, M., Chikowo, R., Corbeels, M., Rowe, E. C., Baijukya, F., Mwijage, A., Smith, J., Yeboah, E., van der Burg, W. J., Sanogo, O. M., Misiko, M., de Ridder, N., Karanja, S., Kaizzi, C., K'ungu, J., Mwale, M., Nwaga, D., Pacini, C. and Vanlauwe, B. (2011). Communicating complexity: Integrated assessment of trade-offs concerning soil fertility management within African farming systems to support innovation and development. Agricultural Systems 104:191203.
Giller, K. E., Witter, E., Corbeels, M. and Tittonell, P. (2009). Conservation agriculture and smallholder farming in Africa: The heretics’ view. Field Crops Research 114:2334.
Godfray, H. C. J., Beddington, J. R., Crute, I. R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J. F., Pretty, J., Robinson, S., Thomas, S. M. and Toulmin, C. (2010). Food security: The challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327:812818.
Harris, D. and Orr, A. (2014). Is rainfed agriculture really a pathway from poverty? Agricultural Systems 123:8496.
Kamanga, B. C. G., Waddington, S. R., Whitbread, A. M., Almekinders, C. J. M. and Giller, K. E. (2014). Improving the efficiency of use of small amounts of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer on smallholder maize in central Malawi. Experimental Agriculture 50:229249.
Klapwijk, C. J., Bucagu, C., van Wijk, M. T., Udo, H. M. J., Vanlauwe, B., Munyanziza, E. and Giller, K. E. (2014). The ‘One cow per poor family’ programme: Current and potential fodder availability within smallholder farming systems in southwest Rwanda. Agricultural Systems 131, 1122.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience As the Source of Learning and Development. Vol. 1. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Masikati, P., Homann-Kee Tui, S., Descheemaeker, K., Crespo, O., Walker, S., Lennard, C. J., Claessens, L., Gama, A. C., Famba, S., van Rooyen, A. F. and Valdivia, R. O. (2015). Crop-livestock intensification in the face of climate change: Exploring opportunities to reduce risk and increase resilience in southern Africa by using an integrated multi-modeling approach. In Handbook of Climate Change and Agroecosystems, The Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP) Integrated Crop and Economic Assessments, 159200 (Eds Rosenzweig, and Hillel, ). London: Imperial College Press.
Morris, M., Binswanger-Mkhize, H. P. and Byerlee, D. (2009). Awakening Africa's Sleeping Giant, 218. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Morris, M., Kelly, V. A., Kopicki, R. J. and Byerlee, D. (2007). Fertilizer use in African Agriculture: Lessons Learned and Good Practice Guidelines. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
Ojiem, J. O., de Ridder, N., Vanlauwe, B. and Giller, K. E. (2006). Socio-ecological niche: A conceptual framework for integration of legumes in smallholder farming systems. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 4:7993.
Pinch, T. J. and Bijker, W. E. (1984). The social construction of facts and artefacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science 14:399441.
Ricker-Gilbert, J., Jayne, T. S. and Chirwa, E. (2011). Subsidies and crowding out: A double-hurdle model of fertilizer demand in Malawi. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 93 (1):2642.
Rufino, M. C., Dury, J., Tittonell, P., van Wijk, M. T., Herrero, M., Zingore, S., Mapfumo, P. and Giller, K. E. (2011). Competing use of organic resources, village-level interactions between farm types and climate variability in a communal area of NE Zimbabwe. Agricultural Systems 104:175190.
Seville, D., Buxton, A. and Vorley, B. (2011). Under what conditions are value chains effective tools for pro-poor development? Report for the Ford Foundation. International Institute for Environment and Development/Sustainable Food Lab. 52.
Sietz, D. and Van Dijk, H. (2015). Land-based adaptation to global change: What drives soil and water conservation in western Africa? Global Environmental Change 33:131141.
Staal, S. J., Baltenweck, I., Waithaka, M. M., de Wolff, T. and Njoroge, L. (2002). Location and uptake: Integrated household and GIS analysis of technology adoption and land use, with application to smallholder dairy farms in Kenya. Agricultural Economics 27:295315.
Sumberg, J. (2002). The logic of fodder legumes in Africa. Food Policy 27:285300.
Sumberg, J. (2005). Constraints to the adoption of agricultural innovations: Is it time for a re-think? Outlook on Agriculture 34:710.
Tittonell, P. and Giller, K. E. (2013). When yield gaps are poverty traps: The paradigm of ecological intensification in African smallholder agriculture. Field Crops Research 143:7690.
Tittonell, P., van Wijk, M. T., Rufino, M. C., Vrugt, J. A. and Giller, K. E. (2007). Analysing trade-offs in resource and labour allocation by smallholder farmers using inverse modelling techniques: A case-study from Kakamega district, western Kenya. Agricultural Systems 95:7695.
Tittonell, P., Vanlauwe, B., Leffelaar, P. A., Rowe, E. C. and Giller, K. E. (2005). Exploring diversity in soil fertility management of smallholder farms in western Kenya. I. Heterogeneity at region and farm scale. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 110:149165.
Traoré, B., van Wijk, M. T., Descheemaeker, K., Corbeels, M., Rufino, M. and Giller, K. E. (2015). Climate variability and change in southern Mali: Learning from farm perceptions and on-farm trials. Experimental Agriculture, 51:615634.
van den Brand, G. (2011). Towards increased adoption of grain legumes among Malawian farmers - Exploring opportunities and constraints through detailed farm characterization. Plant Production Systems Group. Wageningen University, Wageningen, 79.
Van Wijk, M. T., Tittonell, P., Rufino, M. C., Herrero, M., Pacini, C., De Ridder, N. and Giller, K. E. (2009). Identifying key entry-points for strategic management of smallholder farming systems in sub-Saharan Africa using the dynamic farm-scale simulation model NUANCES-FARMSIM. Agricultural Systems 102:89101.
Vanlauwe, B., Coe, R., Giller, K. E. (2019) Beyond averages: New approaches to understand heterogeneity and risk of technology success or failure in smallholder farming. Experimental Agriculture, 55 (S1):84106.
Vanlauwe, B., Coyne, D., Gockowski, J., Hauser, S., Huising, J., Masso, C., Nziguheba, G., Schut, M. and Van Asten, P. (2014). Sustainable intensification and the African smallholder farmer. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 8:1522.
Vanlauwe, B., Descheemaeker, K., Giller, K. E., Huising, J., Merckx, R., Nziguheba, G., Wendt, J. and Zingore, S. (2015). Integrated soil fertility management in sub-Saharan Africa: Unravelling local adaptation. SOIL 1:491508.
Vermeulen, S., Zougmoré, R., Wollenberg, E., Thornton, P., Nelson, G., Kristjanson, P., Kinyangi, J., Jarvis, A., Hansen, J., Challinor, A., Campbell, B. and Aggarwal, P. (2012). Climate change, agriculture and food security: A global partnership to link research and action for low-income agricultural producers and consumers. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 4:128133.
Wairegi, L. W. I. and van Asten, P. J. A. (2010). The agronomic and economic benefits of fertilizer and mulch use in highland banana systems in Uganda. Agricultural Systems 103 (8):543550.
Zingore, S., Murwira, H. K., Delve, R. J. and Giller, K. E. (2007). Influence of nutrient management strategies on variability of soil fertility, crop yields and nutrient balances on smallholder farms in Zimbabwe. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 119:112126.
Zingore, S., Tittonell, P., Corbeels, M., Wijk, M. T. and Giller, K. E. (2011). Managing soil fertility diversity to enhance resource use efficiencies in smallholder farming systems: A case from Murewa District, Zimbabwe. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 90 (1):87103.

WHICH OPTIONS FIT BEST? OPERATIONALIZING THE SOCIO-ECOLOGICAL NICHE CONCEPT

  • KATRIEN DESCHEEMAEKER (a1), ESTHER RONNER (a1), MARY OLLENBURGER (a1), ANGELINUS C. FRANKE (a2), CHARLOTTE J. KLAPWIJK (a1) (a3), GATIEN N. FALCONNIER (a1), JANNIKE WICHERN (a1) and KENNETH E. GILLER (a1)...

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed