Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T14:16:06.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

URINE EFFECTS ON SOIL CHEMICAL PROPERTIES AND THE IMPACT OF URINE AND DUNG ON PEARL MILLET YIELD

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2001

J. M. POWELL
Affiliation:
International Livestock Research Institute, BP 12404 Niamey, Niger Present address: USDA-ARS Dairy Forage Research Center, University of Wisconsin, 1925 Linden Drive West, Madison, WI 53706, USA. Email: jmpowel2@facstaff.wisc.edu
F. N. IKPE
Affiliation:
River State University of Science and Technology, PMB 5080, Port Harcourt, Nigeria
Z. C. SOMDA
Affiliation:
MicroMacro, 183 Paradise Boulevard Suite 108, Athens, GA 30607, USA
S. FERNÁNDEZ-RIVERA
Affiliation:
International Livestock Research Institute, BP 12404 Niamey, Niger

Abstract

Most farming systems in semi-arid West Africa rely on organic matter recycling for maintaining soil fertility. The cycling of biomass through ruminant livestock into dung (faeces) and urine that fertilize the soil has long been an important factor in t he nutrient cycling processes of these integrated, mixed crop/livestock systems. While dung greatly improves soil properties and crop yields, little is known about the effects of urine on soil chemical properties and the impact of dung and urine on crop p roduction. An average voiding of sheep urine applied to a sandy, siliceous soil in the Republic of Niger increased soil pH, available phosphorus and ammonium levels dramatically in the upper 10–15 cm of soil, especially during the first week following application. Losses of applied urine nitrogen via volatilization were in the order of 30–50%. A four-year field trial was conducted on the same soil type to evaluate the effects on pearl millet and weed yields of corralling cattle o r sheep overnight on cropland (dung plus urine application) for one, two or three nights, every one, two or three years versus the effects of applying only dung at the same application rates and intervals achieved with corralling. The main results of this field trial were that (1) urine had large positive effects on millet grain, threshed panicle, leaf, stem and weed yields, (2) sheep dung was more effective than cattle dung in increasing yield, (3) two nights of dung application was adequate for maximum yield and (4) the positive effects of dung and urine on yield lasted two to three cropping seasons after application.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1998 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)