Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T05:22:40.527Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

OPERATIONALIZING AN INNOVATION PLATFORM APPROACH FOR COMMUNITY-BASED PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH ON CONSERVATION AGRICULTURE IN BURKINA FASO

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 October 2016

DER DABIRE ,
NADINE ANDRIEU ,
PATRICE DJAMEN ,
KALIFA COULIBALY ,
HELENA POSTHUMUS ,
AMADOU MOHAMADOUN DIALLO ,
MEDINA KARAMBIRI ,
JEAN-MARIE DOUZET  and
BERNARD TRIOMPHE
DER DABIRE
Affiliation:
International Center of Research on Livestock in Sub-humid Zone (CIRDES), Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso
NADINE ANDRIEU*
Affiliation:
French Agricultural Research Center for International Development (CIRAD), Montpellier, France International Center for Tropical Agriculture, Cali, Colombia
PATRICE DJAMEN
Affiliation:
Green Innovation for Development (Greenindev), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
KALIFA COULIBALY
Affiliation:
International Center of Research on Livestock in Sub-humid Zone (CIRDES), Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso
HELENA POSTHUMUS
Affiliation:
Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands Natural Resources Institute (NRI), University of Greenwich, United Kingdom
AMADOU MOHAMADOUN DIALLO
Affiliation:
International Center of Research on Livestock in Sub-humid Zone (CIRDES), Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso
MEDINA KARAMBIRI
Affiliation:
International Center of Research on Livestock in Sub-humid Zone (CIRDES), Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso
JEAN-MARIE DOUZET
Affiliation:
French Agricultural Research Center for International Development (CIRAD), Montpellier, France Green Innovation for Development (Greenindev), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
BERNARD TRIOMPHE
Affiliation:
French Agricultural Research Center for International Development (CIRAD), Montpellier, France
*
§§Corresponding author. Email: nadine.andrieu@cirad.fr; Contact address: French Agricultural Research Center for International Development (CIRAD), 73 av. Jean-François Breton, 34 398 Montpellier Cedex, France.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Numerous innovation platforms have been implemented to encourage the adoption of agricultural innovations and stakeholder interactions within a value chain. Yet little research has been undertaken on the design and implementation of innovation platforms focussing on issues other than market access and aiming to encourage agro-ecological intensification. This is the case for the development of Conservation Agriculture (CA) in West Africa, which due to its complex nature calls for technical, organizational and institutional changes at the level of both production systems and village territories. This article analyses the design and implementation process of platforms in three villages in Burkina Faso aiming to develop CA technical references with local stakeholders, and to renew rules of interaction between stakeholders within a territory. The platforms enabled farmers in the three villages to actively participate in the identification of the cropping systems that were tested and to improve their knowledge and mastery of CA. They furthermore promoted networking among producers and facilitated the development of new rules for crop residue use. The platforms thus appear to be relevant mechanisms, enabling complex innovations to be addressed. Diverse modifications and improvements are discussed that would ensure the sustainability of the platforms and the evolution of their objectives and activities beyond those of the project under which they were launched.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 53 , Issue 3 , July 2017 , pp. 460 - 479
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

ACT, CIRAD, ICRAF (2012). Final report of the project smallholder conservation agriculture promotion in western and central Africa (SCAP). Nairobi: ACT.Google Scholar
Cooper, P. J. M., Dimes, J., Rao, K. P. C., Shapiro, B., Shiferaw, B. and Twomlow, S. J. (2008). Coping better with current climatic variability in the rain-fed farming systems of sub-Saharan Africa: An essential first step in adapting to future climate change?. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 126:24–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2008.01.007.Google Scholar
Devaux, A., Horton, D., Velasco, C., Thiele, G., López, G., Bernet, T., Reinoso, I. and Ordinola, M. (2009). Collective action for market chain innovation in the Andes. Food Policy 34:31–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2008.10.007.Google Scholar
Djamen Nana, P., Andrieu, N., Zerbo, I., Ouedraogo, Y. and Le Gal, P. Y. (2015). Agriculture de conservation et performances des exploitations agricoles en Afrique de l'Ouest. Cahiers Agricultures 24:113–122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1684/agr.2015.0743.Google Scholar
Dugué, P., Djamen Nana, P., Faure, G. and Le Gal, P. Y. (2015). Dynamiques d'adoption de l'agriculture de conservation dans les exploitations familiales: de la technique aux processus d'innovation. Cahiers Agricultures 24:60–68.Google Scholar
Hounkonnou, D., Kossou, D., Kuyper, T. W., Leeuwis, C., Nederlof, S. E., Röling, N., Sakyi-Dawson, O., Traoré, M. and van Huis, A. (2012). An innovation systems approach to institutional change: Smallholder development in West Africa. Agricultural Systems 108:74–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2012.01.007.Google Scholar
Karambiri, S., Andrieu, N., Chia, E., Laurens, L. and Diallo, M. (2015). La charte foncière de Koumbia est-elle une convention locale source de développement territorial?. Colloque ASRDLF : Territoires méditerranéens – agriculture, alimentation et villes, Montpellier. Retrieved from http://www.prodinra.inra.fr.Google Scholar
Kassam, A., Friedrich, T., Shaxson, F. and Pretty, J. (2009). The spread of conservation agriculture: justification, sustainability and uptake. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 7:292–320. http://dx.doi.org/10.3763/ijas.2009.0477.Google Scholar
Kilelu, C. W., Klerkx, L. and Leeuwis, C. (2013). Unravelling the role of innovation platforms in supporting co-evolution of innovation: Contributions and tensions in a smallholder dairy development programme. Agricultural Systems 118:65–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2013.03.003.Google Scholar
Knowler, D. and Bradshaw, B. (2007). Farmers’ adoption of conservation agriculture: A review and synthesis of recent research. Food Policy 32:25–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2006.01.003.Google Scholar
Koutou, M., Vall, E., Chia, E., Andrieu, N. and Traoré, K. (2012). Leçons de l'expérience des comités de concertation villageois pour la conception des innovations : le cas du projet Fertipartenaires au Burkina Faso. In Partenariat, Modélisation, Expérimentation: Quelles Leçons Pour la Conception de L'innovation et L'intensification Ecologique (Eds Vall, E., Andrieu, N., Chia, E. and Nacro, H.B.). Bobo-Dioulasso: Cédérom.Google Scholar
Lemieux, V. (1999). Les Réseaux d'acteurs Sociaux. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
McLean, E. O. (1982) Soil pH and lime requirement. In Methods of Soil Analysis Part 2, 199–224 (Eds Page, A. L., Miller, R. H. and Keeney, D. R.). Madison: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Misiko, M., Mundy, P. and Ericksen, P. (2013). Innovation platforms to support natural resource management. Innovation Platforms Practice Brief 11. Nairobi, Kenya: ILRI.Google Scholar
Nederlof, E. S., Wongtschowski, M. and Van der Lee, F. (2011). Putting heads together. In Agricultural Innovation Platforms in Practice, Bulletin 396, Amsterdam: KIT Publishers.Google Scholar
Nyemeck, B. J. (2011). Assessing the potential impact of integrated agricultural research for development (IAR4D) on adoption of improved cereal-legume crop varieties in the Sudan Savannah zone of Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural & Food Information 12:177–198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10496505.2011.563233.Google Scholar
Schut, M., Klerkx, L., Sartas, M., Lamers, D., Campbell, M. M. C., Ogbonna, I., Kaushik, P., Atta-Krah, K. and Leeuwis, C. (2015). Innovation platforms: Experiences with their institutional embedding in agricultural research for development. Experimental Agriculture, Online first. doi:10.1017/S001447971500023X Google Scholar
Scopel, E., Triomphe, B., Affholder, F., Macena Da Silva, F. A., Corbeels, M., Valadares Xavier, J. H., Lahmar, R., Recous, S., Bernoux, M., Blanchart, E., De Carvalho Mendes, L. and De Tourdonnet, S. (2013). Conservation agriculture cropping systems in temperate and tropical conditions, performances and impacts. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 33:113–130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13593-012-0106-9.Google Scholar
Steins, N. A. and Edwards, V. M. (1999). Platforms for collective action in multiple-use common-pool resources. Agriculture and Human Values 16:241–255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/a:1007591401621.Google Scholar
Swaans, K., Cullen, B., van Rooyen, A., Adekunle, A., Ngwenya, H., Lema, Z. and Nederlof, S. (2013).Dealing with critical challenges in African innovation platforms: Lessons for facilitation. Knowledge Management for Development Journal 9:116–135 http://journal.km4dev.org/.Google Scholar
Tenywa, M. M., Rao, K. P. C., Tukahirwa, J. B., Buruchara, R., Adekunle, A. A., Mugabe, J., Wanjiku, C., Mutabazi, S., Fungo, B., Kashaija, N. I., Pali, P., Mapatano, S., Ngaboyisonga, C., Farrow, A., Njuki, J. and Abenakyo, A. (2011). Agricultural innovation platform as a tool for development oriented research: lessons and challenges in the formation and operationalization. Learning Publics Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Studies 2:117–146.Google Scholar
Tittonell, P., Scopel, E., Andrieu, N., Posthumus, H., Mapfumo, P., Corbeels, M., Van Halsema, G. E., Lahmar, R., Lugandub, S., Rakotoarisoa, J., Mtambanengwe, I., Pound, B., Chikowo, R., Naudin, K., Triomphe, B. and Mkomwa, S. (2012). Agroecology-based aggradation-conservation agriculture (ABACO): Targeting innovations to combat soil degradation and food insecurity in semi-arid Africa. Field Crops Research 132:168–174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2011.12.011.Google Scholar
Touzard, J. M., Temple, L., Faure, G. and Triomphe, B. (2014). Systèmes d'innovation et communautés de connaissances dans le secteur agricole et agroalimentaire. Innovations 43:13–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/inno.043.0013.Google Scholar
Triomphe, B., Goulet, F., Dreyfus, F. and Tourdonnet, S. (2007). Du labour au non-labour: pratiques, innovations et enjeux au Sud et au Nord. In Nous Labourons: Actes du Colloque Techniques du Travail de la Terre, Hier et Aujourd'hui, ici et là-bas, 371—384 (Eds Bourrigaud, R. and Sigaut, F.). Nantes: Ed. du Centre d'histoire du travail, ISBN 978-2-912228-17-8.Google Scholar
Vall, E. and Bayala, I. (2014). Contractualization of relations in the Teria project in Burkina Faso. In Innovating with Rural Stakeholders in the Developing Word: Action Research in Partnership, 143—153 (Eds Faure, G., Gasselin, P., Triomphe, B., Temple, L. and Hocdé, H.). Wageningen: CTA.Google Scholar
Walkley, A. and Black, I. A. (1934). An examination of Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and proposed modification of the chromic acid tritation method. Soil Science, 37:29–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003.Google Scholar
Warner, J. (2005). Multi-stakeholder platforms: integrating society in water resource management. Ambiente & Sociedade, 8:4–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1414-753x2005000200001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Dabire supplementary material

Supplementary Figures

Download Dabire supplementary material(File)
File 1.3 MB