Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

MEASURING THE IMPACT OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH: THE CASE OF NEW WHEAT VARIETIES IN TURKEY

  • AHMED MAZID (a1), MESUT KESER (a1), KOFFI N. AMEGBETO (a1), ALEXEY MORGOUNOV (a2), AHMET BAGCI (a3), KENAN PEKER (a3), MUSTAFA AKIN (a4), MURAT KUCUKCONGAR (a4), MUSTAFA KAN (a4), ARIF SEMERCI (a4), SEVINC KARABAK (a4), AHMET ALTIKAT (a4) and SADIYE YAKTUBAY (a4)...

Summary

This paper summarizes a study initiated by the Turkish General Directorate of Agricultural Research and ICARDA/CIMMYT Wheat Improvement Program on the adoption of five new winter and spring wheat varieties developed and released by the Turkish national breeding program and through international collaboration in the past 10 years. The study results are based on a survey of 781 households selected randomly in the Adana, Ankara, Diyarbakir, Edirne, and Konya provinces of Turkey. The five new wheat varieties are compared to old improved varieties released prior to 1995 that are also still grown by farmers. Technical and biological indicators of impacts including crop productivity are measured to determine the impact of these varieties. Yield stability is assessed by comparing average yields in normal, good and dry years and by comparing the coefficients of variation of yields by variety. Profitability is measured by the gross margin generated per unit of land. Household income from wheat and for all economic activities are estimated and compared between adopters and non-adopters. Adopters of the new varieties have higher per-capita income than non-adopters as compared to the same group using old varieties. However, the overall impact of the improved varieties is generally low, mainly due to their low adoption levels. Farmers’ knowledge and perception of certain variety characteristics and unavailability of adequate and timely seed are the main reasons. Increasing adoption has the potential to improve household income and this requires revising wheat impact pathway to achieve the expected impact.

Copyright

Corresponding author

††Corresponding author. Email: a.mazid@cgiar.org

References

Hide All
Barkley, A. and Peterson, H. H. (2008). Wheat variety selection: an application of portfolio theory to improve returns. Proceedings of the NCCC-134 Conference on Applied Commodity Price Analysis, Forecasting and Market Risk Management. St. Louis, MO. Available at: http://www.farmdoc.uiuc.edu/nccc134.
Barkley, A. P. and Porter, L. L. (1996). The determinants of wheat variety selection in Kansas, 1974–1993. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78 (1): 202211.
Campbell, B. M., Jeffrey, S., Kozanayi, W., Luckert, M., Mutambo, M. and Zindi, C. (2002). Household Livelihoods in Sami-Arid Region: Option and Constraints. Jakarta, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research.
Carney, D. (1998). Sustainable Rural Livelihoods–What Contributions Can We Make? London, UK: DFID.
Cavendish, W. (1999). Incomes and poverty in rural Zimbabwe during adjustment: the case of Shindi Ward, Chivi Communal Area, 1993/94 to 1996/97. Rep/99-1. Centre for the Study of African Economies, University of Oxford, UK.
Chambers, R. and Conway, G. (1992). Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: Practical Concepts for the 21st Century. Discussion Paper 296. Brighton: Institute for Development Studies.
Douthwaite, B., Kuby, T., van de Fliert, E. and Schulz, S. (2003). Impact pathway evaluation: an approach for achieving and attributing impact in complex systems. Agricultural Systems 78: 243265.
FAO (2008). Commodities by country. Rome, Italy: Economic and Social Department, FAO. Available at: http://www.fao.org/es/ess/top/country.html.
IFAD (2012). Rural poverty in Turkey. Available at: http://www.ruralpovertyportal.org/country/home/tags/turkey.
International Winter Wheat Improvement Program (IWWIP) (2009). What is IWWIP? Available at: http://www.iwwip.org/aboutus.asp?l=english.
Griffin, R. C., Montgomery, J. M. and Rister, M. E. (1987). Selecting functional form in production function analysis. Western Journal of Agricultural Economics 12 (2): 216227.
Haidar, M. (2009). Sustainable livelihood approaches: the framework, lessons learnt from practice and policy recommendations. Paper presented at expert group meeting on adopting the sustainable livelihoods approach for promoting rural development in the ESCWA Region. Beirut, 21–22 December 2009.
MARA (2008). Delegation of the European Commission to Turkey. Available at: http://www.tarim.gov.tr.
Mazid, A., Amegbeto, K. N., Keser, M., Morgounov, A., Peker, K., Bagc, A., Akin, M., Kucukcongar, M., Kan, M., Karabak, S., Semerci, A., Altikat, A. and Yaktubay, S. (2009). Adoption and impacts of improved winter and spring wheat varieties in Turkey. Aleppo, Syria: International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA).
Mazid, A., Shideed, K., El-Abdullah, M., Zyadeh, G. and Moustafa, J. (2013). Impacts of crop improvement research on farmers’ livelihoods: the case of winter-sown chickpea in Syria. Experimental Agriculture 49 (3): 336351.
Saatci, E. and Akpinar, E. (2007). Assessing poverty and related factors in Turkey. Croatian Medical Journal 48 (5): 628635.
Semerci, A., Mazid, A., Amegbeto, K. N., Keser, M., Morgounov, A., Peker, K., Bagci, A., Akin, M., Kucukcongar, M., Kan, M., Karabak, S., Altikat, A. and Yaktubay, S. (2012). The production functions of wheat production in Turkey. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science 18 (2): 240253.
Shideed, K. H. and El Mourid, M. (Eds) (2005). Adoption and impact assessment of improved technologies in crop and livestock production systems in the CWANA region. The development of integrated crop/livestock production in low rainfall areas of Mashreq and Maghreb Regions (Mashreq/Maghreb Project). ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria.
Turkish Statistical Institute (2009). Main Statistics: Income, Consumption, and Poverty. Available at: http://www.turkstat.gov.tr.
UNDP (2013). Human Development Report. Available at: http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/reports/14/hdr2013_en_complete.pdf.
World Bank (2013). World Development Indicators. Available at: http://data.worldbank.org/country/turkey#cp_wdi.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed