Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

INNOVATION PLATFORMS: EXPERIENCES WITH THEIR INSTITUTIONAL EMBEDDING IN AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOR DEVELOPMENT

  • MARC SCHUT (a1) (a2), LAURENS KLERKX (a2), MURAT SARTAS (a1) (a2) (a3), DIEUWKE LAMERS (a1), MARIETTE MC CAMPBELL (a4), IFEYINWA OGBONNA (a4), PAWANDEEP KAUSHIK (a4), KWESI ATTA-KRAH (a5) and CEES LEEUWIS (a2)...

Summary

Innovation Platforms (IPs) are seen as a promising vehicle to foster a paradigm shift in agricultural research for development (AR4D). By facilitating interaction, negotiation and collective action between farmers, researchers and other stakeholders, IPs can contribute to more integrated, systemic innovation that is essential for achieving agricultural development impacts. However, successful implementation of IPs requires institutional change within AR4D establishments. The objective of this paper is to reflect on the implementation and institutionalisation of IPs in present AR4D programmes. We use experiences from sub-Saharan Africa to demonstrate how the adoption and adaptation of IPs creates both opportunities and challenges that influence platform performance and impact. Niche-regime theory is used to understand challenges, and anticipate on how to deal with them. A key concern is whether IPs in AR4D challenge or reinforce existing technology-oriented agricultural innovation paradigms. For example, stakeholder representation, facilitation and institutional embedding determine to a large extent whether the IP can strengthen systemic capacity to innovate that can lead to real paradigm change, or are merely ‘old wine in new bottles’ and a continuation of ‘business as usual’. Institutional embedding of IPs and – more broadly – the transition from technology-oriented to system-oriented AR4D approaches requires structural changes in organisational mandates, incentives, procedures and funding, as well as investments in exchange of experiences, learning and capacity development.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      INNOVATION PLATFORMS: EXPERIENCES WITH THEIR INSTITUTIONAL EMBEDDING IN AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOR DEVELOPMENT
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      INNOVATION PLATFORMS: EXPERIENCES WITH THEIR INSTITUTIONAL EMBEDDING IN AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOR DEVELOPMENT
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      INNOVATION PLATFORMS: EXPERIENCES WITH THEIR INSTITUTIONAL EMBEDDING IN AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOR DEVELOPMENT
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Corresponding author

§Corresponding author. Email: m.schut@cgiar.org

References

Hide All
Adekunle, A. A. and Fatunbi, A. O. (2012). Approaches for setting-up multi-stakeholder platforms for agricultural research and development. World Applied Sciences Journal 16 (7):981988.
Altieri, M. A. (1984). Pest management technologies for peasants - a farming systems approach. Crop Protection 3 (1):8794.
Arkesteijn, M., van Mierlo, B. and Leeuwis, C. (2015). The need for reflexive evaluation approaches in development cooperation. Evaluation 21 (1):99115.
Ayele, S., Duncan, A., Larbi, A. and Khanh, T. T. (2012). Enhancing innovation in livestock value chains through networks: lessons from fodder innovation case studies in developing countries. Science and Public Policy 39 (3):333346.
Battilana, J., Leca, B. and Boxenbaum, E. (2009). How actors change institutions: towards a theory of Institutional Entrepreneurship. The Academy of Managament Annals 3 (1):65107.
Biggs, S. (2008). Learning from the positive to reduce rural poverty and increase social justice: institutional innovations in agricultural and natural resources research and development. Experimental Agriculture 44 (1):3760.
Biggs, S. D. (1995). Farming systems research and rural poverty: relationships between context and content. Agricultural Systems 47 (2):161174.
Boogaard, B., Klerkx, L., Schut, M., Leeuwis, C., Duncan, A. and Cullen, B. (2013). Critical issues for reflection when designing and implementing research for development in innovation platforms. Report for the CGIAR Research Program on Integrated Systems for the Humidtropics. 42: Knowledge, Technology & Innovation Group (KTI), Wageningen University and Research Centre, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Botha, N., Klerkx, L., Small, B. and Turner, J. A. (2014). Lessons on transdisciplinary research in a co-innovation programme in the New Zealand agricultural sector. Outlook on Agriculture 43 (3):219223.
Clark, W. C., Tomich, T. P., van Noordwijk, M., Guston, D., Catacutan, D., Dickson, N. M. and McNie, E. (2011). Boundary work for sustainable development: natural resource management at the consultative group on international agricultural research (CGIAR). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2011:1–8.
Coe, R., Sinclair, F. and Barrios, E. (2014). Scaling up agroforestry requires research ‘in’ rather than ‘for’ development. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 6 (2014):7377.
CORAF/WECARD (2012). Integrated Agricultural Research for Development (IAR4D) —Innovation Systems: Innovation Platforms (IP) of Agriculture Value Chains and Food Systems 19 Dakar Senegal CORAF/WECARD.
Cullen, B., Tucker, J., Snyder, K., Lema, Z. and Duncan, A. (2014). An analysis of power dynamics within innovation platforms for natural resource management. Innovation and Development 4 (2):259275.
De Janvry, A. and Kassam, A. H. (2004). Towards a regional approach to research for the CGIAR and its partners. Experimental Agriculture 40:159178.
Dentoni, D. and Klerkx, L. (2015). Co-managing public research in Australian fisheries through convergence-divergence processes. Marine Policy 60:259271.
Devaux, A., Andrade-Piedra, J., Horton, D., Ordinola, M., Thiele, G., Thomann, A. and Velasco, C. (2010). Brokering innovation for sustainable development: the papa andina case. ILAC Working Paper 12, Institutional Learning and Change (ILAC) Initiative, Rome, Italy.
Devaux, A., Horton, D., Velasco, C., Thiele, G., Lopez, G., Bernet, T., Reinoso, I. and Ordinola, M. (2009). Collective action for market chain innovation in the Andes. Food Policy 34 (1):3138.
Donnet, L., Hellin, J. and Riis-Jacobsen, J. (2012). Linking agricultural research with the agribusiness community from a pro-poor perspective: the importance of human capital development. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 15A (Special Issue Global Networks, Global Perspectives and Global Talent): 99–03.
Ekboir, J., Douthwaite, B., Sette, C. and Alvarez, S. (2013). Dealing with complexity, adaptability and continuity in agricultural research for development organizations,. ILAC Working Paper 15, http://www.cgiar-ilac.org/files/publications/working_papers/ilac_working_paper_no._15_cpwf.pdf.
Elzen, B., Barbier, M., Cerf, M. and Grin, J. (2012a). Stimulating transitions towards sustainable farming systems. In Farming Systems Research into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic, 431455 (Eds Darnhofer, I., Gibbon, D. and Dedieu, B.). Netherlands: Springer.
Elzen, B., van Mierlo, B. and Leeuwis, C. (2012b). Anchoring of innovations: assessing Dutch efforts to harvest energy from glasshouses. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 5:118.
Engel, P. G. H. (1995). Facilitating Innovation: An Action-oriented Approach and Participatory Methodology to Improve Innovative Social Practice in Agriculture. Vol. PhD, 300 Wageningen, the Netherlands: Wageningen University.
FARA (2012). Making things happen: stories from the field – Series 1. FARA (Forum for Agricultural Research in Africa), Accra, Ghana.
Faysse, N. (2006). Troubles on the way: an analysis of the challenges faced by multi-stakeholder platforms. Natural Resources Forum 30 (3):219229.
Flinterman, J. F., Roep, D. and Luijer, A. (2013). Bridging incompatible regimes: how the formation of intermediary regimes drives system innovation In System Innovations, Knowledge Regimes, and Design Practices towards Transitions for Sustainable Agriculture, 86—100 (Eds Elzen, B. and Barbier, M.). France: INRA - Science for Action and Development.
Friederichsen, R., Minh, T. T., Neef, A. and Hoffmann, V. (2013). Adapting the innovation systems approach to agricultural development in Vietnam: challenges to the public extension service. Agriculture and Human Values 30 (4):555568.
Fuenfschilling, L. and Truffer, B. (2013). The structuration of socio-technical regimes-conceptual foundations from institutional theory. Research Policy 43:772791.
Geels, F. (2004). From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy 33 (6–7):897920.
Gibbons, M. (1994). Transfer sciences: management of distributed knowledge production. Empirica 21 (3):259270.
Giller, K. E. (2013). Can we define the term ‘farming systems?’ A question of scale. Outlook on Agriculture 42 (3):149153.
Giller, K. E., Leeuwis, C., Andersson, J. A., Andriesse, W., Brouwer, A., Frost, P., Hebinck, P., Heitkönig, I., van Ittersum, M. K., Koning, N., Ruben, R., Slingerland, M., Udo, H., Veldkamp, T., van de Vijver, C., van Wijk, M. T. and Windmeijer, P. (2008). Competing claims on natural resources: what role for science? Ecology and Society 13 (2):34. Available at: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss32/art34/.
Hall, A. (2005). Capacity development for agricultural biotechnology in developing countries: an innovation systems view of what it is and how to develop it. Journal of International Development 17 (5):611630.
Hall, A., Rasheed Sulaiman, V., Clark, N. and Yoganand, B. (2003). From measuring impact to learning institutional lessons: an innovation systems perspective on improving the management of international agricultural research. Agricultural Systems 78 (2):213241.
Hellin, J., Bellon, M. R., Badstue, L., Dixon, J. and La Rovere, R. (2008). Increasing the impacts of participatory research. Experimental Agriculture 44 (01):8195.
Hinrichs, C. C. (2014). Transitions to sustainability: a change in thinking about food systems change? 31(1):143–155.
Horton, D. (1998). Disciplinary roots and branches of evaluation: some lessons from agricultural research. Knowledge and Policy: The International Journal of Knowledge Transfer and Utilization 10 (4):3266.
Horton, D. and Mackay, R. (2003). Using evaluation to enhance institutional learning and change: recent experiences with agricultural research and development. Agricultural Systems 78 (2):127142.
Hounkonnou, D., Kossou, D., Kuyper, T. W., Leeuwis, C., Nederlof, E. S., Röling, N., Sakyi-Dawson, O., Traoré, M. and Van Huis, A. (2012). An innovation systems approach to institutional change: smallholder development in West Africa. Agricultural Systems 108 (5):7483.
Hung, S.-C. and Whittington, R. (2011). Agency in national innovation systems: institutional entrepreneurship and the professionalization of Taiwanese IT. Research Policy 40 (4):526538.
Ilukor, J., Birner, R., Rwamigisa, P. B. and Nantima, N. (2015). The provision of veterinary services: who are the influential actors and what are the governance challenges? A case study of Uganda. Experimental Agriculture Online: 1–27.
Kemp, R., Schot, J. and Hoogma, R. (1998). Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: the approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 10 (2):175198.
Kenmore, P., Litsinger, J. A., Bandong, J. P., Santiag, A. C. and Salac, M. M. (1987). Philippine rice farmers and insecticides: thirty years of growing dependency and new options for change. In Management of Pests and Pesticides: Farmers’ Perceptions and Practices, 98115 (Eds Tait, J. and Napompeth, P.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Kerr, R. B., Snapp, S., Chirwa, M., Shumba, L. and Msachi, R. (2007). Participatory research on legume diversification with malawian smallholder farmers for improved human nutrition and soil fertility. Experimental Agriculture 43 (4):437453.
Kilelu, C. W., Klerkx, L. and Leeuwis, C. (2013). Unravelling the role of innovation platforms in supporting co-evolution of innovation: contributions and tensions in a smallholder dairy development programme. Agricultural Systems 118:6577.
Klerkx, L., Aarts, N. and Leeuwis, C. (2010). Adaptive management in agricultural innovation systems: the interactions between innovation networks and their environment. Agricultural Systems 103 (2010):390400.
Klerkx, L., Adjei-Nsiah, S., Adu-Acheampong, R., Saïdou, A., Zannou, E. T., Soumano, L., Sakyi-Dawson, O., Van Paassen, A. and Nederlof, S. (2013). Looking at agricultural innovation platforms through an innovation champion lens. An analysis of three cases in West Africa. Outlook on Agriculture 42 (3):185192.
Klerkx, L. and Leeuwis, C. (2008). Delegation of authority in research funding to networks: experiences with a multiple goal boundary organization. Science and Public Policy 35 (3):183196.
Klerkx, L. and Leeuwis, C. (2009). Operationalizing Demand-Driven Agricultural Research: institutional Influences in a Public and Private System of Research Planning in The Netherlands. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 15 (2):161175.
Klerkx, L., van Mierlo, B. and Leeuwis, C. (2012). Evolution of systems approaches to agricultural innovation: concepts, analysis and interventions. In Farming Systems Research into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic, 457483 (Eds Darnhofer, I., Gibbon, D. and Dedieu, B.). Dordrecht: Springer.
Kloet, R. R., Hessels, L. K., Zweekhorst, M. B. M., Broerse, J. E. W. and de Cock Buning, T. (2013). Understanding constraints in the dynamics of a research programme intended as a niche innovation. Science and Public Policy 40 (2):206218.
Kristjanson, P., Reid, R. S., Dickson, N., Clark, W. C., Romney, D., Puskur, R., MacMillan, S. and Grace, D. (2009). Linking international agricultural research knowledge with action for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 9(13):5047–5052.
Kumar, R. (2005). Research Methodology: A Step-by-step Guide for Beginners. London: SAGE.
Lamine, C. (2011). Transition pathways towards a robust ecologization of agriculture and the need for system redesign. Cases from organic farming and IPM. Journal of Rural Studies 27:209219.
Leeuwis, C. (2000). Reconceptualizing participation for sustainable rural development: towards a negotiation approach. Development and Change 31 (5):931959.
Leeuwis, C., Schut, M., Waters-Bayer, A., Mur, R., Atta-Krah, K. and Douthwaite, B. (2014). Capacity to Innovate from a System CGIAR Research Program Perspective. 5: Penang, Malaysia: CGIAR Research Program on Aquatic Agricultural Systems. Program Brief: AAS-2014-29.
Li, J., Leeuwis, C., Jiggins, J. and Lammerts van Bueren, E. (2013). Towards a regime change in the organization of the seed supply system in China. Experimental Agriculture 49 (1):114133.
Loorbach, D. and Rotmans, J. (2010). The practice of transition management: examples and lessons from four distinct cases. Futures 42 (3):237246.
Lundy, M., Gottret, M. V. and Ashby, J. (2005). Learning Alliances: An Approach for Building Multi-stakeholder Innovation Systems. In ILAC Brief 8 Rome: Bioversity.
Messely, L., Rogge, E. and Dessein, J. (2013). Using the rural web in dialogue with regional stakeholders. Journal of Rural Studies 32 (0):400410.
Minh, T. T., Friederichsen, R., Neef, A. and Hoffmann, V. (2014). Niche action and system harmonization for institutional change: prospects for demand-driven agricultural extension in Vietnam. Journal of Rural Studies 36 (0):273284.
Moschitz, H., Roep, D., Brunori, G. and Tisenkopfs, T. (2015). Learning and innovation networks for sustainable agriculture: processes of co-evolution, joint reflection and facilitation. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 21 (1):111.
Mvumi, B. M., Morris, M., Stathers, T. E. and Riwa, W. (2009). Doing things differently: post-harvest innovation learning alliances in Tanzania and Zimbabwe. In Innovation Africa, Enriching Farmers’ Livelihoods, 199 (Eds Pascal, C., Sanginga, A., Waters-Bayer, S., Kaaria, J., Njuki, and Wettasinha, C.). London, UK: Earthscan.
Nederlof, E. S. and Pyburn, R. (2012). One Finger cannot Lift a Rock: Facilitating Innovation Platforms to Trigger Institutional Change in West Africa. Amsterdam: Royal Tropical Institute.
Nederlof, S., Wongtschowski, M. and van der Lee, F. (Eds) (2011). Putting Heads together. Agricultural Innovation Platforms in Practice. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: KIT Publishers.
Neef, A. and Neubert, D. (2011). Stakeholder participation in agricultural research projects: a conceptual framework for reflection and decision-making. Agriculture and Human Values 28 (2):179194.
Nettle, R., Brightling, P. and Hope, A. (2013). How programme teams progress agricultural innovation in the Australian dairy industry. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 19 (3):271290.
Ngwenya, H. and Hagmann, J. (2011). Making innovation systems work in practice: experiences in integrating innovation, social learning and knowledge in innovation platforms. Knowledge Management for Development Journal 7 (1):109124.
Nowotny, H., Scott, P. and Gibbons, M. (2003). Introduction: ‘Mode 2’ revisited: the new production of knowledge. Minerva 41 (3):179194.
Ortiz, O., Frias, G., Ho, R., Cisneros, H., Nelson, R., Castillo, R., Orrego, R., Pradel, W., Alcazar, J. and Bazán, M. (2008). Organizational learning through participatory research: CIP and CARE in Peru. Agriculture and Human Values 25 (3):419431.
Pamuk, H., Bulte, E. and Adekunle, A. A. (2014). Do decentralized innovation systems promote agricultural technology adoptionα Experimental evidence from Africa. Food Policy 44:227236.
Pant, L. P. (2012). Learning and Innovation Competence in Agricultural and Rural Development. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 18 (3):205230.
Pontius, J., Dilts, R. and Bartlett, A. (2002). Ten Years of Building Community: From Farmer Field Schools to Community IPM Jakarta, Indonesia: Community IPM Programme, FAO.
Real, A. and Hickey, G. M. (2013). Publicly funded research: a participative experience from the chilean native forest research fund. Forest Policy and Economics 37:3743.
Rivera, W. M. and Sulaiman, V. R. (2009). Extension: object of reform, engine for innovation. Outlook on Agriculture 38 (3):267273.
Roep, D., Van der Ploeg, J. D. and Wiskerke, J. S. C. (2003). Managing technical-institutional design processes: some strategic lessons from environmental co-operatives in the Netherlands. NJAS: Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 51 (1/2):195217.
Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of Innovation. Ithaca, New York: The Free Press.
Röling, N. (Ed) (1994). Platforms for Decision Making about Ecosystems. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
Roux, D. J., Stirzaker, R. J., Breen, C. M., Lefroy, E. C. and Cresswell, H. P. (2010). Framework for participative reflection on the accomplishment of transdisciplinary research programs. Environmental Science & Policy 13 (8):733741.
Russell Bernard, H. (2006). Research Methods in Anthropology. Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, 4th edn. Oxford, UK: AltaMira Press.
Santamaría Guerra, J. (2003). Institutional Innovation for Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Resources Management: Changing the Rules of the Game. Vol. PhD, 215 Wageningen: Wageningen University.
Schot, J., Geels, F. W. (2008). Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda, and policy. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 20:537554.
Schut, M., Cunha Soares, N., van de Ven, G. W. J. and Slingerland, M. (2014a). Multi-actor governance of sustainable biofuels in developing countries: the case of Mozambique. Energy Policy 65:631643.
Schut, M. and Hinnou, L. C. (2014). Rapid Appraisal of Agricultural Innovation Systems (RAAIS) Workshops Burundi, DR Congo, and Rwanda. 128 Wageningen, the Netherlands: Wageningen University (WUR) and International Institute for Tropical Agriculture (IITA).
Schut, M., Klerkx, L., Rodenburg, J., Kayeke, J., Raboanarielina, C., Hinnou, L. C., Adegbola, P. Y., van Ast, A. and Bastiaans, L. (2015a). RAAIS: rapid Appraisal of Agricultural Innovation Systems (Part I). A diagnostic tool for integrated analysis of complex problems and innovation capacity. Agricultural Systems 132 (2015): 111.
Schut, M., Leeuwis, C., van Paassen, A. and Lerner, A. (2011). Knowledge and innovation management in the policy debate on biofuel sustainability in Mozambique: what roles for researchers? Knowledge Management for Development Journal 7 (1):4564.
Schut, M., Rodenburg, J., Klerkx, L., Kayeke, J., van Ast, A. and Bastiaans, L. (2015b). RAAIS: rapid appraisal of agricultural innovation systems (Part II). Integrated analysis of parasitic weed problems in rice in Tanzania. Agricultural Systems 132 (2015):1224.
Schut, M., Rodenburg, J., Klerkx, L., van Ast, A. and Bastiaans, L. (2014b). Systems approaches to innovation in crop protection. A systematic literature review. Crop Protection 56 (2014):98108.
Schut, M., van Paassen, A., Leeuwis, C. and Klerkx, L. (2014c). Towards dynamic research configurations. A framework for reflection on the contribution of research to policy and innovation processes. Science and Public Policy 41 (2014):207218.
Sherwood, S. (2009). Learning from carchi. Agricultural modernisation and the production of decline. In Communication and Innovation Studies, Vol. PhD-thesis, 286 Wageningen: Wageningen University and Research.
Sherwood, S., Schut, M. and Leeuwis, C. (2012). Learning in the social wild: encounters between farmer field schools and agricultural science and development in ecuador. In Adaptive Collaborative Approaches in Natural Resources Governance: Rethinking Participation, Learning and Innovation, 102137 (Eds Ojha, H. R., Hall, A. and Sulaiman, R.). London, UK: Routledge.
Smink, M. M., Hekkert, M. P. and Negro, S. O. (2015). Keeping sustainable innovation on a leash? Exploring incumbents’ institutional strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment 24 (2):86101.
Smith, A. (2007). Translating sustainabilities between green niches and socio-technical regimes. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 19:427450.
Struik, P. C., Klerkx, L., van Huis, A. and Röling, N. G. (2014). Institutional change towards sustainable agriculture in West Africa. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 12 (3):203213.
Sumberg, J., Heirman, J., Raboanarielina, C. and Kaboré, A. (2013a). From agricultural research to ‘product development’: what role for user feedback and feedback loops? Outlook on Agriculture 42 (4):233242.
Sumberg, J., Thompson, J. and Woodhouse, P. (2013b). Why agronomy in the developing world has become contentious. Agriculture and Human Values 30 (1):7183.
Swaans, K., Boogaard, B., Bendapudi, R., Taye, H., Hendrickx, S. and Klerkx, L. (2014). Operationalizing inclusive innovation: lessons from innovation platforms in livestock value chains in India and Mozambique. Innovation and Development 4 (2):239257.
Thiele, G., Devaux, A., Velasco, C. and Horton, D. (2007). Horizontal evaluation: fostering knowledge sharing and program improvement within a network. American Journal of Evaluation 28 (4):493508.
Thiele, G., Fliert, E. and Campilan, D. (2001). What happened to participatory research at the international potato center? Agriculture and Human Values 18 (4):429.
Ton, G., Klerkx, L., Grip, K. d. and Rau, M. L. (2015). Innovation grants to smallholder farmers: revisiting the key assumptions in the impact pathways. Food Policy 51:923.
Vanloqueren, G. and Baret, P. V. (2009). How agricultural research systems shape a technological regime that develops genetic engineering but locks out agroecological innovations. Research Policy 38 (6):971983.
van Mierlo, B. and Totin, E. (2014). Between script and improvisation: institutional conditions and their local operation. Outlook on Agriculture 43 (3):157163.
van Paassen, A., Klerkx, L., Adu-Acheampong, R., Adjei-Nsiah, S. and Zannoue, E. (2014). Agricultural innovation platforms in West Africa. How does strategic institutional entrepreneurship unfold in different value chain contexts? Outlook on Agriculture 43 (3):193200.
Watts, J., Horton, D., Douthwaite, B., La Rovere, R., Thiele, G., Prasad, S. and Staver, C. (2008). Transforming impact assessment: beginning the quiet revolution of institutional learning and change. Experimental Agriculture 44 (01):2135.
Wellbrock, W., Roep, D., Mahon, M., Kairyte, E., Nienaber, B., Domínguez García, M. D., Kriszan, M. and Farrell, M. (2013). Arranging public support to unfold collaborative modes of governance in rural areas. Journal of Rural Studies 32 (0):420429.
World Bank (2006). Enhancing Agricultural Innovation: How to go Beyond the Strengthening of Research Systems. 118 Washington DC, USA: World Bank.

INNOVATION PLATFORMS: EXPERIENCES WITH THEIR INSTITUTIONAL EMBEDDING IN AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOR DEVELOPMENT

  • MARC SCHUT (a1) (a2), LAURENS KLERKX (a2), MURAT SARTAS (a1) (a2) (a3), DIEUWKE LAMERS (a1), MARIETTE MC CAMPBELL (a4), IFEYINWA OGBONNA (a4), PAWANDEEP KAUSHIK (a4), KWESI ATTA-KRAH (a5) and CEES LEEUWIS (a2)...

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed