Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T05:32:14.272Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Identifying Target Groups for Agricultural Research: The Categorization of Rice Farmers in the Dominican Republic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

Frans Doorman
Affiliation:
Department of Rural Sociology of the Tropics and Subtropics, Agricultural University, Hollandsewes 1, 6706 KN Wageningen, Netherlands

Summary

A method is discussed for classifying small scale rice farmers from the Dominican Republic who have similar production systems and access to land, but differ widely in the yields they obtain and in the adoption of new technology. The results are used to define two recommendation domains, for farmers with ‘good’ and ‘poor’ production conditions, and to suggest appropriate technology for each. For farmers working in good production conditions the development of a technological package based on the double cropping of semi-dwarf varieties with high yield potential and production efficiency is recommended; for farmers with poor production conditions, a technological package is suggested based on varieties with a high tolerance of drought, flooding and weed development, which yield adequately at low input levels.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Byerlee, D., Collinson, M. P., Perrin, R. K., Winkelmann, D. L., Biggs, S., Moscardi, E. R., Martinez, J. C., Harrington, L. & Benjamin, A. (1980). Planning Technologies Appropriate to Farmers: Concepts and Procedures. El Batán, Mexico: CIMMYT.Google Scholar
Doorman, F. (1983). Adopcióny Adaptatión en el Usode Tecnologia en la Productión de Arroz. Resultados del Estudio de Casos en el Cultivo de Arnz entre Pequeños Productores de la Región de Nagua. Leiden: IDC Microform Publishers; Wageningen: Department of Rural Sociology, Wageningen Agricultural University.Google Scholar
Doorman, F. (1986). Condiciones, Rendimientos e Ingresos en el Cultivo del Arroz.: Resultados de una Encuesta entre 242 Arroceros de la Reforma Agraria en las Zonas de Mao y Nagua. Leiden: IDC Microform Publishers; Wageningen: Department of Rural Sociology, Wageningen Agricultural University.Google Scholar
Doorman, F. & Cuevas Pérez, F. (1984). Farmer's Adaptations to Production Constraints and its Implications for Agricultural Research: The Case of Rice Production Systems in the Dominican Republic. Paper presented at the 20th Annual Meeting of the Caribbean Food Crops Society, St. Croix, 21–26 October, 1984. Leiden: IDC Microform Publishers; Wageningen: Department of Rural Sociology, Wageningen Agricultural University.Google Scholar
Harrington, L. W. & Tripp, R. (1984). Recommendation Domains: A Frameworkfor On-farm Research. Economics Program Working Paper 02/84. El Batán, Mexico: CIMMYT.Google Scholar
Perrin, R. K., Winkelmann, D. L., Moscardi, E. R. & Anderson, J. R. (1976). From Agronomic Data to Farmer Recommendations: An Economics Training Manual. Mexico DF: CIMMYT.Google Scholar
Rhoades, R. E. (1982). The Art of the Informal Agricultural Survey. Social Science Department. Training Document 2. Lima: CIP.Google Scholar
Shaner, W. W., Philipp, P. F. & Schmehl, W. R. (1982). Farming Systems Research and Development: Guidelines for Developing Countries. Westview special studies in agriculture/aquaculture. Boulder, Colorado; Westview Press.Google Scholar
Wotowiec, P., Poats, S. & Hildebrand, P. E. (1986). Research recommendation and diffusion domains: a farming systems approach to targeting. Paper submitted to the 1986 Conference on Gender Issues in Farming Systems Research and Extension. Gainesville: University of Florida.Google Scholar