Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T14:12:17.442Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EVALUATING EXPERIMENTAL AND COMMERCIAL YIELDS: AN ANALYSIS OF A SIMPLE CORRECTION TECHNIQUE FOR SUGARCANE IN SOUTH AFRICA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2009

SANESH RAMBURAN
SANESH RAMBURAN*
Affiliation:
South African Sugarcane Research Institute, Private Bag X02, Mount Edgecombe, 4300, South Africa
*
†Email: Sanesh.Ramburan@sugar.org.za
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The objective of this study was to compare historical experimental and commercial yield data for sugarcane in order to determine the general level of disparity and assess the possibility of deriving a correction factor to adjust trial yields to realistic commercial levels. Over the 29-year comparison period, trial yields (fresh stalk weight) of sugarcane were significantly higher (p < 0.001) than commercial yields by approximately 30 t ha−1. Trial and commercial yield data were used to derive a correction factor of 0.7, which can be used to successfully correct trial yields to equivalent commercial levels at both the national and regional level; however, at the local (mill supply area) level different correction factors were derived. The degree of correlation between experimental and commercial yields was found to be greater in areas of higher yield potential, and it was also established that off-station trials were more representative of the commercial potential than on-station trials. The correction factor of 0.7 can therefore be used as a tool to adjust experimental sugarcane yields to indicate likely commercial levels, thereby improving the confidence of growers in taking up recommendations for the adoption of new varieties derived from trial yields.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 45 , Issue 2 , April 2009 , pp. 199 - 208
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bezuidenhout, C. N. (1998). A relational database for agronomic data storage and processing. Proceedings of the South African Sugar Industry Agronomists Association, Mount Edgecombe, South Africa, 36–42.Google Scholar
Bissesur, D., Ramnawas, C. and Ramdoyal, K. (2007). Comparison of sugarcane yields in trials and in commercial fields. Proceedings of the International Society of Sugarcane Technologists, Durban, South Africa, 26:681–690.Google Scholar
Davidson, B. (1962). Crop yields in experiments and on farms. Nature 194:458–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. N., Basford, K. E., Leslie, J. K., Hogarth, D. M. and Cooper, M. (2004). A methodology for analysis of sugarcane productivity trends 2: Comparing variety trials with commercial productivity. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 55:109–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J. (2007). Advances in field technology and environmental awareness in the South African sugar industry. Sugar Cane International 25: 22–28.Google Scholar
Milligan, S. B., Balzarini, M., Gravois, K. A. and Bischoff, P. (2007). Early stage sugarcane selection using different plot sizes. Crop Science 47:1859–1864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mordocco, A., Stringer, J. K. and Cox, M. C. (2007). District adoption patterns of commercial sugarcane varieties to increase economic returns to the Australian sugar industry. Sugar Cane International 25: 3–6.Google Scholar
Parfitt, R. C. (2005). Release of sugarcane varieties in South Africa. Proceedings of the South African Sugar Technologists Association, Durban, South Africa, 79:63–71.Google Scholar
Pillay, K. P. (1999). Adoption of new sugarcane varieties by the non–miller–planters in Mauritius: The importance of on–farm trials. Experimental Agriculture 35:417–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramburan, S., Redshaw, K. A. and Van Den Berg, M. (2007). Variety evaluation in the South African sugarcane industry: An overview. Proceedings of the International Society of Sugarcane Technologists, Durban, South Africa, 26:558–561.Google Scholar
Simmonds, N. W. (1980). Comparisons of the yields of four potato varieties in trials and in agriculture. Experimental Agriculture 16:393–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, D. I. T. and Simmonds, N. W. (1981). Comparison of the performance of sugar–cane varieties in trials and in agriculture. Experimental Agriculture 17:137–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar